Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Just da Facts wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Good grief...Comey and Page haven't been involved in the investigation for a long time, so at this point, it doesn't matter what they knew back when they were. That is just a beyond a hopeful point for you to make and it doesn't prove anything.

2) Your reasoning for Trump's firing of Comey is ridiculous. If Trump and his campaign were truly innocent, he should have let the investigation go on unfettered, and been as helpful as he possibly could have been...instead he has tried to block the investigation in just about every way possible. Can you imagine that if he actually WERE innocent so that he KNEW the investigation would show that he was how big of a "f*ck you" that would have been to the Democrats had he allowed it to continue under Comey? As it is, he demonstrably lies about just about everything, and since he has tried to block this investigation at every turn, why would you think he is telling the truth about this?

3) Dude, what are you talking about with regard to suspected wrongdoing? The FBI got tips from several countries saying that the Trump campaign had perhaps been compromised by the Russians, and then a drunk Papadopolous lets the cat out of the bag to some Australian dude. Investigations of ALL kinds are started with phone calls to police...tips about someone who might have committed a crime. You then investigate to get evidence to present in court. There was nothing nefarious here...all on the up and up.

4) Again with Comey and Page -- doesn't matter what they saw THEN...goes to why this was the biggest mistake of Trump's life to fire Comey. He should have let it go...they might not have found anything. But, Trump behaves like a guilty person, and admits he fired Comey because of the investigation, so a Special Counsel is created with way more resources who have a more laser focus. Be honest with yourself, if a Democrat President fired the person who was investigating his or her campaign, you would KNOW it was obstruction of justice, you would be very suspicious of that person, and you would be RIGHT. For the record, I would be just as against that person as I am against Trump (well, at least with regard to that kind of improper behavior...it would be hard to be as big an a$$hole as Trump is).

1) It's not a hopeful point- it is THE point regarding the Special Counsel's inappropriate appointment. Rosenstein caved to pressure from butthurt Democrats and establishment shills. At the time, there was no evidence of a crime, and- as stated by Comey and Page- a believe that they wouldn't find anything proving Trump-Russia collusion. (Point 1)

2) You need to read the article I posted regarding the Page/Strzok/Comey testimony. They all flat out stated that they did not have evidence of collusion. Trump took Rosenstein's recommendation as a green light to fire Comey for trying to hang a gray cloud over his presidency out of spite. Letting a fake investigation hound you by a butthurt MSM on a daily basis would suck real bad.

3) If you believe that, you are a fool. And even if Popadopulous did do something wrong, how is it that Comey, Page, and Strzok all stated in May 2017 that there wasn't any evidence of collusion (again, see the article I posted for their direct testimony).

4) This is just a bunch of babbling on your part. But to answer one of the few *objective* aspects of your post, Rosenstein's recommendation to fire Comey actually gets Trump off the hook here.

You guys need to lower your expectations for the conclusion announcement, or you're going to really go off the deep end and do something bad. You guys are still very sensitive to this whole POTUS45 thing. You should take some time away and re-assess what's important in your life, because it truly isn't Donald J Trump.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

You all babbling back and forth does nothing though trolling Flagpole is comical. You are all overly passionate about a subject that you can only give an opinion off of what the news feeds you. None of you know the truth unless you have a security clearance and get first hand knowledge based off that clearance.

A former federal worker told me years ago that “if you don’t watch the news you aren’t informed, if you do watch it you are mis-informed. These news organizations are owned by four people of four major networks. Both democrats and republicans completely control what news comes forward and what the narrative of that news will be. They are focused on having the public think and act a certain way. Democrats won the news and the city. Luckily in this past election a good number of voters saw right through it.

I will say what is stated above is just my opinion. Unless someone like Meuller firmly puts a name to a story I never believe a story to be true for example anonymous sources.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

You all babbling back and forth does nothing though trolling Flagpole is comical. You are all overly passionate about a subject that you can only give an opinion off of what the news feeds you. None of you know the truth unless you have a security clearance and get first hand knowledge based off that clearance.

A former federal worker told me years ago that “if you don’t watch the news you aren’t informed, if you do watch it you are mis-informed. These news organizations are owned by four people of four major networks. Both democrats and republicans completely control what news comes forward and what the narrative of that news will be. They are focused on having the public think and act a certain way. Democrats won the news and the city. Luckily in this past election a good number of voters saw right through it.

I will say what is stated above is just my opinion. Unless someone like Meuller firmly puts a name to a story I never believe a story to be true for example anonymous sources.

Jeez, hallelujah, a rational person.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

You all babbling back and forth does nothing though trolling Flagpole is comical. You are all overly passionate about a subject that you can only give an opinion off of what the news feeds you. None of you know the truth unless you have a security clearance and get first hand knowledge based off that clearance.

A former federal worker told me years ago that “if you don’t watch the news you aren’t informed, if you do watch it you are mis-informed. These news organizations are owned by four people of four major networks. Both democrats and republicans completely control what news comes forward and what the narrative of that news will be. They are focused on having the public think and act a certain way. Democrats won the news and the city. Luckily in this past election a good number of voters saw right through it.

I will say what is stated above is just my opinion. Unless someone like Meuller firmly puts a name to a story I never believe a story to be true for example anonymous sources.

Jeez, hallelujah, a rational person.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

L L wrote:

That’s cute how you compare not informed to misinformed.

And that the news forms our opinions.

There are facts that come out of the news that help us form our own opinions.

Manafort was found guilty of financial crimes and has plead guilty to foreign conspiracy.

He was Trump’s campaign manager.

Cohen directed Trump’s funds for payoffs to help his campaign and has been charged and plead guilty.

Flynn discussed sanctions with Russia before Trump took office.

Trump happened to be accused of conspiring with Russia to help him get elected.

Trump had a two hour meeting with Putin while president with no one there to document their discussions.

No argues that these are facts.

And we can form and communicate our own opinions based on the news of these events.

Not going to try and sway you one way or another. News is manipulated in a way to turn a a small hill into a mountain. Unfortunately both sides do this. It’s just a game. I promise you this, Democrats are no angels.