Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Runningart2004 wrote:

So for those assuming Trump will lose who will the candidate be? Does Warren, Feinstein, Booker or Harris have a chance? Sanders? Biden?

Does it matter?

Alan

Pages and pages ago I said that Booker would be the Dem nominee and win 2020.

I’ve also said Trump will resign next spring.

So, Trump will not lose or win in 2020.

Mueller has basically put a hold on releasing information or new indictments in the run up to the election.

But news will pour out afterwards.

The Manafort sentencing for the first trial and plea for the second trial has yet to be determined.

The Flynn sentencing/ plea has yet to be determined.

Cohen’s situatiation has not been finanlized.

Trump has potential illegal activities tied to all of those.

And that doesn’t even count potential conspiracy or obstruction of justice.

But the paper trail on the financial crime is pretty damning.

The Democrat controlled House will begin impeachment proceedings prettty early in the year.

Trump will want to cut a deal before too much public damage gets done.

If they ever charge President Trump with a campaign finance law then they better do the same thing to President Obama. Campaign finance laws are very vague and not very serious.

Avenatti is a clown and Democrats should distance themselves from him. The Kavanaugh thing was an embarrassment. A woman who kept going to parties to get gang raped? Who exactly wants to go back for more?

This is the best prediction in this thread. I'm not willing to say for sure Trump will resign by Spring...I still say it will be before the 2020 election (or he will force the Senate to convict him), but I DO think you might very well be right.

You are also right that Mueller is holding back for now until after the midterms, and then stuff will pour out afterwards, perhaps even including Don Jr., Kushner, Stone, and more against Manafort.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

If they ever charge President Trump with a campaign finance law then they better do the same thing to President Obama. Campaign finance laws are very vague and not very serious.

Obama's administration committed a campaign finance violation and had to pay a fine, but A) Obama was not involved, and B) it was not a FELONY campaign finance violation.

Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to TWO counts of FELONY Campaign Finance Law Violation and fingered Trump as the one who told him to do it.

If Trump were not President now, he would have been indicted for these two felonies.

The hammer is coming.

Fat Hurts and Flagpole>>>>>both got burned!!!!! Ouch!!!!!!! Only lying Dumbocrats would argue against that!

LOL! Back peddling Flagpole, too funny:) Many of us predicted that.

Now he claims it's NEXT Spring! Then it will be "I never said he'd be impeached, ever". Then it will be, "well he was guilty regardless of him finishing his term or not". Thank God for archives!

Now he's pumping his alter ego, LL, supporting him by saying this might be the best prediction in this thread. Flagpole the leader has turned into Flagpole the follower, bowing to his new leader LL.

Yep, it's gonna be the biggest I TOLD YOU SO in the history of Letsrun, Flagpole's words. He's gonna be told alright!

Wanna bet? If you're so confident, then it's a sure thing and you'll win, right? Now's the part where you say, betting is for losers. Well, so are outlandish predictions that have no chance of happening. The funniest thing is you really think you're a smart man, but you're not. Your post has been said by many others, and it hasn't happened and won't happen.

LL=Double Loser

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Creepy porn president had unprotected sex with a porn star while his wife was home with a 4-month old baby.

Now everybody knows it.

Stormy got out of the hush agreement.

Stormy got to keep the $130,000.

Stormy's book sold over a million copies.

Trump can't sue her.

Avanatti got the fame he obviously wanted.

And best of all, Trump's attorney, Michael Cohen has now flipped.

Seems to me that Avanatti has DEVASTATED Donald Trump.

Fool. Avenatti got his ass handed to him in court. He lost. You can't spin this, your side lost, get over it.

Avenatti lost one battle. But Avenatti obviously won the war.

The creepy porn president was DEVASTATED.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

You sure had to dig deep for that article. Your pitiful attempt to deflect fails. Try again, sore loser.

how is the Washington Post reporting today on the republican candidate for US senate...digging deep?

i mean you guys are still talking about whitewater.

Yep, and with all of the Clinton Corruption, before lying Hillary even ran in 2016, you were fine with it.

This below was published on May 19 of this year. Agip, LL and their leader, well, they won't understand it. For those others on the left, read it and try to understand. You had a bad candidate in Hillary Clinton and those with a brain knew it. Some voted for her anyways, fine. Agip still says, you're still talking about Whitewater, as if Hillary's involvement with that and dozens of things should be forgotten. That is moronic logic but doesn't surprise me in the least.

****Close associates using the perception of closeness to officials to seek large consulting fees from businesses? How do you think Bill Clinton's former personal aide, Doug Band, got rich enough to buy David Rockefeller's $20 million mansion?

Getting in private business at the same time you serve as a top official adviser in government? Huma Abedin was doing it years before Jared Kushner.

You can even compare the Clinton and Trump swamps live in action in Prague this month, where Steve Bannon will debate longtime Clinton confidant (and brownnoser) Lanny Davis at an event sponsored by the Czech defense contractor for which Davis lobbies.

My point is not that what Bill and Hillary Clinton's associates did is as bad as what Trump and his associates have done.

It's not just money where the need to defend the Clintons made it impossible for Democrats to enforce ethical standards internally.

For decades, the perceived need to defend Bill Clinton's sexual misbehavior required Democrats to let things go they should not have, even including one credible accusation of rape.

It wasn't just Bill that Democrats were covering for. The death of Mary Jo Kopechne didn't stop Democrats from calling Ted Kennedy "the conscience of the Senate" for decades.

This is my answer: More than any other individuals, Bill and Hillary Clinton are responsible for creating the impression of inevitable corruption that Trump has exploited to get his supporters to shrug off his own corruption.

********

^^^^^^And agip or LL recently called everything conspiracy theories. Shows how biased and ignorant they are.

You're all absolutely delusional if you think a Republican controlled senate will move forward to actually remove Trump. So far Trump has shown at least some understanding that he must keep the Republicans in the Senate happy (not firing Mueller and not firing Jeff Sessions yet). They will keep him in power for as long as he is convenient to them, and all he has to do is sit back and be a rubber stamp for their increasingly retarded legislation, and of course put as many conservative judges on benches across America. Based on everything in the past two years, do you honestly think Republicans would move against Trump even if Mueller's evidence was totally damning?

No. They'd call it fake news, deep state, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Hillary's emails, triggered libtards, ha ha ha we won you lost get over it. When their idiot base eats it up, we get a country that's even more divided in 2020 than it was in 2016. It's sad, but that's the reality.

You are right. And here is some more reality. Tax-cheat Trump is an autocrat. Here are the ways that autocrats leave office:

1. Die in office

2. Thrown in prison

3. Escape to exile in another country

4. Taken out back and shot

Tax-cheat Trump will never leave office voluntarily. Those are the only four outcomes.

Also, watch carefully who replaces Mattis. Control of the military is crucial for an autocrat.

(OK, so I sound paranoid. But tell me what leads you to believe that Tax-cheat Trump would accept impeachment or an election loss.)

538 house forecast up to 85% likelihood of a dem House in 2019.

Cherokee Nation wrote:

Hahaha hahaha. Hahahahahah. Hahaha haha.

https://i.redd.it/lvq10z8ivds11.jpg

Hahaha!! And she called herself "Native American" on a job application.

Funny how fast news moves nowadays. Just 24 hours ago, it was "Hey look, she was right!"... then it was "Trump owes her $1M!"... then it was "But wait, she's only 1/500th?"... then Cherokee Nation tells her to "just please stop, you are not one of us"... and now, 24 hours later, she's a laughing stock.

I never said the senate would remove Trump. I agree with you that they would not do that.

They showed that with the Kavanaugh confirmation, being almost in lock step together.

They don't even need a Republican controlled senate. 34 Senate Republicans can block an impeachment conviction.

I said that Trump would resign.

And this is why:

It's not the conviction he fears, it's the discovery and the testimony.

In his private life, he could cut deals on bankruptcies and lawsuits.

The only deal he can cut here is to resign.

They are going to pull all of his tax returns.

They are going to trace all of his bank transfers, hush money payments, etc.

They are going to dig into Jared's shady dealings.

They are going to see what has been transferred to Ivanka, Don Jr, Eric, Tiffany and Baron.

They are going to look at the hotel business since he became president.

And all of that may become public during an impeachment trial.

Plus, he will testify. Any question under oath to Trump is a perjury trap. Like- what did you have for breakfast?

Just going through the process of an impeachment trial could set him up for convictions once he is out of office, even if the senate does not convict him then.

That is why he may choose to resign before all of that happens.

And then he will become a martyr of the system and his base will still love him.

Runningart2004 wrote:

So for those assuming Trump will lose who will the candidate be? Does Warren, Feinstein, Booker or Harris have a chance? Sanders? Biden?

Does it matter?

Alan

I don't think any of them can beat Trump. What's worse, the two candidates likely to perform the best are Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders, both well over the age of 70. And unfortunately I don't think a woman will do well. It will probably be seen as a Democratic trope trying desperately to get a woman in the White House (I'm not saying that's the actual reality, but that's likely to be the narrative pushed by Republicans and other people with IQs lower than 70).

Vegas Vegan Oddsmaker wrote:

Wanna bet? If you're so confident, then it's a sure thing and you'll win, right? Now's the part where you say, betting is for losers. Well, so are outlandish predictions that have no chance of happening. The funniest thing is you really think you're a smart man, but you're not. Your post has been said by many others, and it hasn't happened and won't happen.

LL=Double Loser

We can't bet because we are anonymous. Are you going to say who you really are, here?

Out of curiosity, what kind of odds are you giving?

My prediction is not likely, I'll admit.

If I bet $100 you'd have to put up at least $500. Or $10,000 if you really think my prediction has no chance and is outlandish.

"Despite the overwhelmingly negative coverage of his administration, President Donald Trump's approval rating is as high or higher than half of the previous six presidents at this point in their first terms."

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-approval-rating/

Racket wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

So for those assuming Trump will lose who will the candidate be? Does Warren, Feinstein, Booker or Harris have a chance? Sanders? Biden?

Does it matter?

Alan

I don't think any of them can beat Trump. What's worse, the two candidates likely to perform the best are Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders, both well over the age of 70. And unfortunately I don't think a woman will do well. It will probably be seen as a Democratic trope trying desperately to get a woman in the White House (I'm not saying that's the actual reality, but that's likely to be the narrative pushed by Republicans and other people with IQs lower than 70).

I think one of these fresh faced Dems running for the House right now will be the candidate - or Beto. I just don't see a 70 year old Dem launching another successful battle.

Biden is the most likely of them all - he has the character and charisma - none of the other old ones do. Berrnie is just not a serious candidate.

So true wrote:

"Despite the overwhelmingly negative coverage of his administration, President Donald Trump's approval rating is as high or higher than half of the previous six presidents at this point in their first terms."

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-approval-rating/

by 538's methodology trump has the lowest approval rating at this point in his presidency of anyone since truman. Might be tied with Reagan.

And those guys had war and recession pulling their numbers down. Trump has a good economy and peace. The guy is loathed.