Mile High CLub wrote:
LOL... wrote:
all set now. Landing in Salt Lake City soon. :-)
Yuck
I agree, Yuck!
Mile High CLub wrote:
LOL... wrote:
all set now. Landing in Salt Lake City soon. :-)
Yuck
I agree, Yuck!
Trumpers never seize to amaze me. LOL
Fat hurts wrote:
Salty Lakes City wrote:
The ego never seizes to amaze me. You're wrong, period. Anyone that confident would place a bet because they know they won't be wrong. Flagpole is your delirious leader LL, Fat Hurts, Trollminator, TREX, etc...all 6 of you whack jobs need his approval. Sad, very sad. Flagpole will be saying the same thing next Spring when the Buckeye snow melts (we live near each other, so I know his seasonal weather). He's, as LL I think said, a blow hard. A pathetic 57? year old man, yearning for the approval of others...hence his repeated I told you so posts. What a loser!
Hillary Lovers never seize to amaze me. LOL
I agree with you brother^!
As of Tuesday this past week, the current four-year presidential term is 41% complete.
Hang in there, everybody!
come on, man! wrote:
um well yah maybe not wrote:
Steve, I'm not quite sure you know what "infer" means, for all your other evident genius...
I'm dying to read flagpole's explanation of how his usage of "infer" was somehow correct in this situation. It must have been, since he is never wrong, and since he has worked as a professional writer, among other things...?
For those who are in the dark: The word Flagpole should have used in this situation was "imply" and not "infer."
It's a common error. The old "Perry Mason" TV series used to make the same mistake all the time.
The sands of time wrote:
As of Tuesday this past week, the current four-year presidential term is 41% complete.
Hang in there, everybody!
I forgot to say that heck, we made it thru with Obama and that was 8 years of lying (not exposed due to his race) and scamming, so you all should be fine for 2 terms!
Good mourning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
A very stabie genius! wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a67JYMhZe7g
Yep, this is what Fat Hurts, LL, agip and their leader Flagpole voted for.
Thanks voters who made the difference in Michigan, Florida, and OHIO!!!! Love me some OHIO!!!!
Buckeye Proud wrote:
A very stabie genius! wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a67JYMhZe7gYep, this is what Fat Hurts, LL, agip and their leader Flagpole voted for.
Thanks voters who made the difference in Michigan, Florida, and OHIO!!!! Love me some OHIO!!!!
Wait, didn't Flagpole, Steve, guarantee a Hillary Clinton Victory?
The sands of time wrote:
The sands of time wrote:
As of Tuesday this past week, the current four-year presidential term is 41% complete.
Hang in there, everybody!
I forgot to say that heck, we made it thru with Obama and that was 8 years of lying (not exposed due to his race) and scamming, so you all should be fine for 2 terms!
Ah, yes, another handle theft.
Thieves are assholes.
Handle thieves are thieves.
Therefore handle thieves are assholes.
But mainly handle thieves are just not entertaining. They're the message-board equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?" Boring. Not clever.
I do note that "The sands of time" made no statement about whether President Trump would be finishing this four-year term or win another. S/he simply made a statement about how much of the current term has elapsed.
A very stabIe genius! wrote:
Good mourning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Mourning is hardly ever good.
p.n. wrote:
come on, man! wrote:
I'm dying to read flagpole's explanation of how his usage of "infer" was somehow correct in this situation. It must have been, since he is never wrong, and since he has worked as a professional writer, among other things...?
For those who are in the dark: The word Flagpole should have used in this situation was "imply" and not "infer."
It's a common error. The old "Perry Mason" TV series used to make the same mistake all the time.
Nope. I meant to use "infer" and meant it to mean what that word means. Sorry, but you are mistaken.
p.n. wrote:
come on, man! wrote:
I'm dying to read flagpole's explanation of how his usage of "infer" was somehow correct in this situation. It must have been, since he is never wrong, and since he has worked as a professional writer, among other things...?
For those who are in the dark: The word Flagpole should have used in this situation was "imply" and not "infer."
It's a common error. The old "Perry Mason" TV series used to make the same mistake all the time.
You are an idiot.
To imply is to express something indirectly.
To infer is to surmise or conclude, especially from indirect evidence.
non Flagpole wrote:
Buckeye Proud wrote:
!!!!
Wait, didn't TRUMP, guarantee MEXICO WOULD PAY FOR HIS WALL?
^ I fixed that for you.
Here's a link to the Fox segment about Cruz being concerned about O'Rourke.
I am telling people, this is a serious race and a Democrat can win a statewide seat in Texas.
1) It wouldn't matter if Hillary were a serial killer and ate her victims. Who she is has NOTHING to do with what we have going on in the White House. No one here has ever said she was a perfect or even a good candidate. As we have unprecedented chaos in the White House with a President who apparently doesn't understand complex issues nor has any inclination to learn or study, it is clear Hillary would have been better. But again, it doesn't matter. She is not the president. We have a failing President in the White House, and that's what those against him are against. Bringing up Hillary Clinton at this point is a deflection and perhaps a defense mechanism for those of you who voted for Trump. He is a serial liar and a criminal and his day of reckoning (legal and/or political reckoning) will come.
2) I DID say that Trump had ZERO chance to win. As we sit here today, I was WRONG about that, however; I also qualified that by saying that there could be no cheating and that if aliens came down here and made us vote for him that that would not count. I used the example of Olympic Gold Medalists losing their medals after they were caught using PEDs as my example for no cheating. Cheaters can not be winners. Unfortunately those qualifications were in the big 2016 election thread (along with my guarantee) that Letsrun deleted after the election. I have asked them to replace it to no avail. If you can get them to put it back, you will see that what I say is true.
You Trumpers continue to hold on to a fantasy.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Buckeye Proud wrote:
A very stabie genius! wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a67JYMhZe7gYep, this is what Fat Hurts, LL, agip and their leader Flagpole voted for.
Thanks voters who made the difference in Michigan, Florida, and OHIO!!!! Love me some OHIO!!!!
Wait, that was supposed to be a damning video of Hillary Clinton?
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Zd0Q7xjplaRNYxD_rykuzAHaE7&pid=15.1&P=0&w=255&h=171inferred wrote:
p.n. wrote:
For those who are in the dark: The word Flagpole should have used in this situation was "imply" and not "infer."
It's a common error. The old "Perry Mason" TV series used to make the same mistake all the time.
You are an idiot.
To imply is to express something indirectly.
To infer is to surmise or conclude, especially from indirect evidence.
I know the meaning of the word. I used it to mean exactly that.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts