Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Just curious here, but why does Trumps attack on the environment not get more coverage? I know its not sexy, but I think this is one, of if not the most important failures of this administration. He's taking apart environmental protections piece by piece and it gets little coverage. It's almost criminal in my opinion

I’m not sure if I agree with the stance but fully agree with the coverage. Cnn and msnbc have done nothing to challenge his policies. Part of it is they have nothing to run on but the other is a full commitment trying to justify why they lost the election.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

That is your “over thinking, I’m trying to do the right thing” Comey screwing that up. If that is what you believe lost Clinton the election you are terribly mistaken. That is one of many many reasons on why she lost.

I think we are more on the same page. If Manafort and Trump are found guilty then I’m behind it. I just want fairness down the line. It seems some (Hilary) are above approach and the law doesn’t apply to her.

I didn't say that was what lost it for her. I know all the reasons (perfect storm) that lost it for her. This didn't help her though, and it would have been much better if he didn't do it.

I'm glad you are for it if Manafort and Trump are found guilty (they will be). For the record, which I have said several times, I will accept no guilty verdicts for them both. They will be found guilty though.

Where we differ is here:

1) I believe there has been complete fairness for both Hillary and Trump (and Manafort).

2) I don't believe that whether Manafort or Trump are found guilty of crimes has anything to do with what Hillary did or didn't do. Even if she were the worst criminal on the planet (she isn't), her crimes would not exonerate Trump and Manafort.

Trump Media attempts to tamper with Manafort jurors wrote:

Amazing stuff. The judge in the Manafort trial is now being protected by US Marshals. Media outlets (Fox News, Briertbart) are attempting to get the names and addresses of jurors for the purpose of . . . take a guess.

The judge in the trial of U.S. President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort said on Friday that he would not release the names and addresses of jurors sought by media outlets because he was worried about their “peace and safety.”

Judge T.S. Ellis, speaking in court while jurors deliberated for a second day, said he had received threats over the case and is being protected by U.S. marshals. “I had no idea this case would excite these emotions. … I don’t feel right if I release their names,” he said.

Yeah, this sucks. Really bad optics for Trump supporters. It's a shame.

XY wrote:

Just curious here, but why does Trumps attack on the environment not get more coverage? I know its not sexy, but I think this is one, of if not the most important failures of this administration. He's taking apart environmental protections piece by piece and it gets little coverage. It's almost criminal in my opinion

Just too far down on the list of his crimes and danger to America. Would be a top target if he were just a policy-driven non-criminal Republican, but he's not. He's a grifter, a con man, someone who is unhinged and not fit to be President.

You answered your own question...it's "almost" criminal. Well, all the other criminal things are ahead of that.

XY wrote:

Just curious here, but why does Trumps attack on the environment not get more coverage? I know its not sexy, but I think this is one, of if not the most important failures of this administration. He's taking apart environmental protections piece by piece and it gets little coverage. It's almost criminal in my opinion

He has been dismantling the unnecessary regulations that had stifled the economic prosperity of our great country. Those tree huggers love obscure wild species more than they love fellow human beings. But President Trump is on the side of hard working men and women of America. The mainstream media do not want to report any of the great achievements of President Trump on the environment, because they know the American people are not on their side.

What is "almost criminal" is the way Obama's EPA tried to make American people sacrifice their lives for the sake of non-human species.

Only simpletons use the 2016 election polling as proof of inaccuracy or bias. As that New York Times article correctly pointed out Hillary was the favorite but it was hardly a certainty. They used an NFL field goal percentage comparison. I was posting on several sites that Hillary was the equivalent of a 4.5 point favorite in an NFL game. That was the money line equivalent. Nobody reacts at all when that type of favorite loses but somehow in politics all the geniuses want to pretend that anyone above 50% is a locked certainty.

More than anything, pathetic white conservatives always feel a need to believe they are being wronged. That's where you get the reverse discrimination crap, and the notion of rampant religious persecution, and so forth. All the things that Trump takes advantage of via his rants and lies.

So no kidding that type always feels pained and trodden upon when trailing in the polls. They view it as more conspiracy than real, and desperately search for methods to unskew polls, or cherry pick the ones they prefer.

And yes, once in a while the favorite loses, and when it's the blue side those brilliant white conservatives rejoice, and are somehow willing to overlook the fact that they won with 46% of the vote, and that a number like that might be a bit of a problem down the road, in a world that counts up to 100 and not 84.

Trump is making sure that our air and water are polluted so that more of us humans get sick and die. That's Trump's EPA.

Make America Great Again wrote:

He has been dismantling the unnecessary regulations that had stifled the economic prosperity of our great country.

The second longest economic expansion in American history is "stifled?" How does that work?

Who needs clean air? That's why there is air conditioning. Clean water from a tap? Overrated. Get sick? You are weak.

Please tell us some more about your young country with weak growth prospects.

Uhh what?

Explain

I believe this internet crap. Hillary Clinton had the election stolen from her by the Russians, this is extremely obvious. Search Results Web results Trump-Russia: more election meddling evidence found, says Senate ...https://www.theguardian.com/.../trump-russia-more-election-meddling-evidence-foun... Jul 3, 2018 - Intelligence committee finds 'further support' to conclusion that Vladimir Putin and his government aimed to boost Trump. From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered ...https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/.../trump-intelligence-russian-election-meddling-.html Jul 19, 2018 - ... J. Trump learned of highly sensitive intelligence about Russian election interference, ... President Trump was shown clear evidence on Jan. Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/.../Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections The Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election in order to increase ... denied involvement in any DNC hacks or leaks, there is strong forensic evidence linking the DNC breach to known Russian operations. ‎Timeline of Russian · ‎Wikipedia: Russian ... · ‎Moscow–Washington hotline 2016 Election Hacking Fast Facts - CNN - CNN.comhttps://www.cnn.com/2016/12/26/us/2016-presidential-campaign...fast.../index.html Jul 18, 2018 - ... the 2016 presidential campaign and Russian meddling in the election. ... As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on ... Trump-Russia investigation: Further evidence Kremlin meddled in ...https://www.independent.co.uk › News › World › Americas Jul 4, 2018 - Further evidence has been found to support three US intelligence agencies' conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, the ... Here's Who Found That Russia Meddled in the 2016 Election | Time time.com › Politics › russia Jul 16, 2018 - Here's Who Found That Russia Meddled in the 2016 Election .... no evidence that the Trump campaign worked with Russia to interfere with the ... Yes, Russian Election Sabotage Helped Trump Win - Bloomberghttps://www.bloomberg.com/view/...07.../russian-meddling-helped-trump-win-in-201... Jul 24, 2018 - Russia did meddle in 2016 election & are trying it again. I've seen no evidence of collusion, plenty evidence of Russian meddling. Russia didn't ... Trump says he accepts evidence of Russian meddling in US elections ...https://www.ft.com/content/813bb4e4-89f4-11e8-b18d-0181731a0340 Jul 17, 2018 - President Donald Trump said he misspoke during his joint public appearance with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, adding he did in fact accept ... Trump saw evidence Putin ordered election swayed in early 2017 ...https://www.cnbc.com/.../trump-saw-evidence-putin-ordered-election-swayed-in-early... Jul 18, 2018 - ... already seen evidence Putin personally ordered election interference ... classified evidence before his inauguration that Russian President ... What we know about Russia's election hacking - POLITICOhttps://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/.../russia-election-hacking-trump-putin-69808... Jul 18, 2018 - This is the picture the evidence paints so far about Russia's interference campaign — and the prognosis for 2018: White House says Trump .

_yourbad_dude wrote:

I believe this internet crap. Hillary Clinton had the election stolen from her by the Russians, this is extremely obvious.

And that all started with Trump asking them to help him out, and he would pay them back.

Make America Great Again wrote:

What is "almost criminal" is the way Obama's EPA tried to make American people sacrifice their lives for the sake of non-human species.

What IS criminal is the way Trump is stealing quality of life from many future generations of Americans. This applies not only to the environment, but also to the huge federal debt he is adding onto with his tax cut.

foo wrote:

Make America Great Again wrote:

What is "almost criminal" is the way Obama's EPA tried to make American people sacrifice their lives for the sake of non-human species.

What IS criminal is the way Trump is stealing quality of life from many future generations of Americans. This applies not only to the environment, but also to the huge federal debt he is adding onto with his tax cut.

He must prefer the Trump kill off all non-human species--animals, plants, everything else. The only solution for food will be Soylent Green.

* A novel about a dystopian future of dying oceans and year-round humidity due to the greenhouse effect, resulting in suffering from pollution, poverty, overpopulation, euthanasia and depleted resources. Soylent Green is the what people eat. People do not know that human corpses are converted into Soylent Green.

Gary, you so so desperate. So disheartened.

Take a rest. The sun will come up tomorrow. And you will still be a loser. But you will be alive, so don't feel bad.

Cheer up, Gary!

///

Lying Gary

This is how Republicans quietly manipulate elections every cycle. They get people in power in smaller offices and scheme to suppress the vote. Previously it was somewhat subtle. But now the the demographics are shifting away from them they are more and more blatant, particularly in states they are worried about like Georgia.

Note this charming play to suddenly close 7 of 9 voting precincts in heavily black areas. Imagine as they schemed for an excuse. Hey, they don't have disability access. That's it! Lock 'em up.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/randolph-county-polling-places_us_5b77115ce4b0a5b1febb04fc?ncid=engmodushpmg00000003

Yup. Trump decided Saudi Arabia is his friend because of their willingness to invest in his, and businesses. So, Trump approves a BIGLY weapons deal with Saudi. . . . Well, one of the bombs Trump hold was "lost" by his pals and used to kill 40 kids on a school bus in Yemen. . . . You just cannot make this type of thing up.

Bomb that killed 40 children in Yemen was supplied by the US [to Saudi Arabia]

— US President Barack Obama banned the sale of precision-guided military technology to Saudi Arabia over "human rights concerns." The ban was overturned by the Trump administration.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/17/middleeast/us-saudi-yemen-bus-strike-intl/index.html

This story is written to incite you; and it did! This story and stories like this one have been written since I can remember. Polling places are changed and closed all over the country. This is not new. When Pennsylvania redrew the district lines at the last minute to give an advantage to Democrats, you did not bat an eye. Why, because you are partisan and biased. ... "The research tends to show that making voting harder, whether through voter ID laws or by limiting early voting, has a small to no effect on voter turnout " ...https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13501120/vote-polling-places-election-2016

Awsi Dooger wrote:

This is how Republicans quietly manipulate elections every cycle. They get people in power in smaller offices and scheme to suppress the vote. Previously it was somewhat subtle. But now the the demographics are shifting away from them they are more and more blatant, particularly in states they are worried about like Georgia.

Note this charming play to suddenly close 7 of 9 voting precincts in heavily black areas. Imagine as they schemed for an excuse. Hey, they don't have disability access. That's it! Lock 'em up.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/randolph-county-polling-places_us_5b77115ce4b0a5b1febb04fc?ncid=engmodushpmg00000003

You have a comprehension problem. The Russians and MANY OTHER countries may have "meddled" in our elections. However, the Russians did not affect the outcome of the election. The liberals, DOJ, FBI have concocted this Russian conspiracy to whip you into shape. They know the majority of liberals are as dumb as a rock.

You might as well believe the Earth is flat or the moon landing was fake.