PIO! wrote:
PIO! wrote:
Ah, a post with some content! Much appreciated.
And without any self-serving cutesiness! Imagine that!
Well done! And Thanks!
I still say Trump is innocent until proven guilty. If nothing happens, flagpole and the others have to admit that he was innocent as they have with HRC. She was guilty but walked away unscathed, so far. The same rules apply to Trump.
Handle thief.
Not as obvious as many of your attempts so I just figured I would point it out.
Grow up.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
We need Congress to enact a citizenship verification law in order to vote.
A complete waste of money. Voter fraud is a nothing-burger. Failure to secure elections from nefarious people --Trump and his people -- is the real election problem lies. Republicans refuse to spend a single dime to protect the 2018 elections. That is all you need to know about what they believe in -- election manipulation by Russia is okay as long as that helps Republicans "win" tainted elections.
DiscoGary wrote:
Limbaugh managed to get Breitbart out of the Liberal Media Rat Maze, so I know it's possible.
Limbaugh and Bannon are both alcoholics. That is the reality of the Rat Maze you Iive in.
Trollminator wrote:
PIO! wrote:
I still say Trump is innocent until proven guilty. If nothing happens, flagpole and the others have to admit that he was innocent as they have with HRC. She was guilty but walked away unscathed, so far. The same rules apply to Trump.
Back up brother... “if nothing happens” meaning what? If he kills the investigation or pardons himself, there will be zero admission of innocence from my part. HRC was thoroughly investigated several times over under standard probes. She didn’t have executive powers. If Mueller’s report clears him I will admit he is innocent - that’s the equivalent. Don’t give me any cr@p about bias because all HRC investigations wereed by republicans and she was still cleared. Don’t forget Mueller is a Republican, you fvckers have come a long way in your twisted thought process.
Just know that you are responding to a handle thief - and therefore pure troll by definition.
Flagpole wrote:
PIO! wrote:
I still say Trump is innocent until proven guilty. If nothing happens, flagpole and the others have to admit that he was innocent as they have with HRC. She was guilty but walked away unscathed, so far. The same rules apply to Trump.
I have said several times that if Trump is found not guilty, I will accept the finding and admit I was wrong. I won't be wrong. His behavior this whole time shows that I will be right. You don't "fight back" like that if you are innocent. When Conspiracy by Trump and/or his staff is proven to help him get elected, I will be right about the 2016 election too.
You do understand that the severity of the crimes against Trump is 1000 times that of what Hillary was accused of, and there is likely even more times that with regard to evidence, right?
And again,
Just know that you are responding to a handle thief - and therefore pure troll by definition.
PIO! wrote:
PIO! wrote:
I still say Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
Handle thief.
Not as obvious as many of your attempts so I just figured I would point it out.
Grow up.
+1
He is so obvious a handle thief. He giggle to himself how clever he thinks he is. The he is Hardloper --one of LRC's top village idiots.
Today we are just one day closer to Trump's comeuppance.
Mueller isn't willing to take Obstruction of Justice off the table. Good for him. He shouldn't.
Trump continues to obstruct justice in plain sight. Comey firing, this latest tweet suggesting Sessions end the Mueller investigation. More tweets of his that Mueller is looking at. Why would Trump commit a crime in plain sight? Because he believes he won't be held accountable. Could be his lack of a filter and lack of control aids in that, but the core of it is that he believes he is above the law and above reproach. He is sorely mistaken.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
We have been expressing our opinions of the investigation based on what Trump has been saying, not what Mueller has been saying.
Mueller has not made a single public statement.
Trump keeps shouting there was no collusion.
No one has formally accused him of anything so why would he keep saying that?
Alcoholics wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Limbaugh managed to get Breitbart out of the Liberal Media Rat Maze, so I know it's possible.
Limbaugh and Bannon are both alcoholics. That is the reality of the Rat Maze you Iive in.
They may or may not be alcoholics.
But what is certain is that you trying to discredit them based on a presumption of alcoholism is bigotry, pure and simple.
There are many alcoholics who are brilliant people. There are many alcoholics who are a-holes. And pretty much all alcoholics are right some of the time and wrong some of the time. To simply name call these folks as alcoholics is no better than Trump's incessant name calling of others as losers, low IQ individuals,...
You can do better.
Hardloper wrote:
You can do better.
HI HARDLOPER!
Steal handles makes you such a little man. No wonder you love small-hands Trump so much.
HI HARDLOPER! wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
You can do better.
HI HARDLOPER!
Steal handles makes you such a little man. No wonder you love small-hands Trump so much.
You are profoundly and dangerously wrong.
What is scary is that your thinking probably is representative of the majority of Americans at this moment in time. This majority is comprised of both folks on the right and folks on the left (as well as folks who are not so easily packaged politically). And the shared tendency of its members is to view all interactions not as opportunities to learn, to teach, to empathize and to understand. But rather as opportunities to mock, to berate, to attack and to defend. This is very sad. And very scary. And you are part of the problem.
Try to go for a day without thinking of others through your Trump lens. Try to think of others as people. Not as Trumpers. Not as anti-Trumpers. As people.
Try.
It will do you a world of good. And it will do the world a small bit of good in the process.
DiscoGary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
What a bogus view. The investigation can absolutely show that someone conspired...what we know publicly already shows that Don Jr., Kushner, and Manafort did. Trump doesn't have to prove he wasn't. Mueller has to prove he was, and if he can't, then that charge doesn't stick. So, in your view, no one ever sent to prison for Conspiracy was ever really guilty?
Of COURSE something could happen where I have to admit I was wrong. If the result of all of the investigations show that Trump was not guilty of anything, then I will be wrong. Many of you Trumpers keep saying Mueller has nothing and that Trump is innocent...well then, you will be right then if we get to the end of the investigation and Mueller does indeed have nothing. You have always been delusional regarding the politics of it all, but now you don't seem to be able to follow simple logic. I am honestly concerned about you.
You just admitted that you "know" Trump conspired , so it won't matter what Mueller's investigation finds because Trump can not prove he didn't do it. You are caught in your own mental trap and you will never escape. Its pitiful to watch.
How can you bold something I wrote and then not understand what it means? I did NOT say I know Trump conspired. Here it is again for you, regarding conspiracy- "what we know publicly already shows that Don Jr., Kushner, and Manafort did. Trump is not mentioned there.
Don Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort went to a meeting with Russians where the clear in writing intention was to give them dirt on Hillary Clinton with also the clear in writing intent to help the Trump campaign win the election. Don Jr. said "I love it, especially in the summer". So, they were all three agreeable to the meeting, Don Jr. gleefully so, and then he provided information back to them by telling them WHEN it would be best for them to release that dirt on Hillary.
So, Don Jr., Kushner, and Manafort will be found guilty of Conspiracy with Russia. If Rudy Giuliani is to be believed, there was possibly a second meeting before the infamous one to discuss what would happen at that meeting.
IF they can prove that Trump himself knew of the meeting and its topic beforehand and/or immediately afterwards, he will be found guilty of Conspiracy also.
To clear this up for you -- I BELIEVE they will all be found guilty of conspiracy (including Trump), and I believe the evidence will show it beyond a shadow of a doubt. BUT, if the process plays out and they all are NOT found guilty of conspiracy, I will accept that ruling as I have continually said. Caught in my own mental trap? Hardly.
Facts are on my side. The truth is on the side of anyone against Trump.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Since Conspiracy is such a big topic there, perhaps some of you need to understand what actually is conspiracy.
It is two or more people conspiring to commit a crime. "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful."
Getting a thing of value from a foreign country to help one win an election is a crime in the US. Meeting with several people to do that is conspiracy.
That thing of value doesn't have to be delivered or there doesn't have to be proof that it was delivered. It is the act of attempting to get it in that meeting that is the conspiracy.
For example...let's say three people were in communication to commit a terrorist act, and on the way to committing that terrorist act, they were stopped by police so that they were unable to commit the act. Those three people wouldn't just be let go. They would be charged with conspiracy to commit a terrorist act.
Michael Cohen says Trump not only knew about the Trump Tower meeting ahead of the meeting but he ok'd having the meeting. Cohen says others were present when this happened. This means this is potentially corroborated if true. Mueller also knows for sure who owns the blocked phone numbers that Don Jr. called before and after the Trump Tower meeting. Was it Trump? Unclear. Who else could it be? We can speculate, but Mueller already knows.
Trump is about to get a Cohenoscopy.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
L L wrote:
We have been expressing our opinions of the investigation based on what Trump has been saying, not what Mueller has been saying.
Mueller has not made a single public statement.
Trump keeps shouting there was no collusion.
No one has formally accused him of anything so why would he keep saying that?
Hey moron. The Mueller investigation was started to investigation collusion.
Every passing day you demonstrate how utterly stupid you are.
4 more years!!!! wrote:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/current_events/politics/prez_track_aug0250% approval for Trump!!!!! Much higher than cheatin hussein ever achieved!!!!
Suck on that, hillary lovers.
Americans are emphatically rejecting democrat stupidity.
Flagpole wrote:
Since Conspiracy is such a big topic there, perhaps some of you need to understand what actually is conspiracy.
It is two or more people conspiring to commit a crime. "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful."
Getting a thing of value from a foreign country to help one win an election is a crime in the US. Meeting with several people to do that is conspiracy.
That thing of value doesn't have to be delivered or there doesn't have to be proof that it was delivered. It is the act of attempting to get it in that meeting that is the conspiracy.
For example...let's say three people were in communication to commit a terrorist act, and on the way to committing that terrorist act, they were stopped by police so that they were unable to commit the act. Those three people wouldn't just be let go. They would be charged with conspiracy to commit a terrorist act.
Michael Cohen says Trump not only knew about the Trump Tower meeting ahead of the meeting but he ok'd having the meeting. Cohen says others were present when this happened. This means this is potentially corroborated if true. Mueller also knows for sure who owns the blocked phone numbers that Don Jr. called before and after the Trump Tower meeting. Was it Trump? Unclear. Who else could it be? We can speculate, but Mueller already knows.
Trump is about to get a Cohenoscopy.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Rico Cooper disagrees.
Obviousity wrote:
L L wrote:
We have been expressing our opinions of the investigation based on what Trump has been saying, not what Mueller has been saying.
Mueller has not made a single public statement.
Trump keeps shouting there was no collusion.
No one has formally accused him of anything so why would he keep saying that?
Hey moron. The Mueller investigation was started to investigation collusion.
Every passing day you demonstrate how utterly stupid you are.
Hey moran. The Mueller investigation was started to investigate LINKS between Russia and people in the Trump campaign, not just collusion, and also any other legal matters that arise from the investigation.
Like, say, finding out that many of the Trump campaign staff are degenerate criminals and often lie to investigators. That sort of thing. And when crews of Russian spies try to get trump elected. You know.
NYT hires virulent anti-white racist. Let's see if she keeps her job.
http://patterico.com/2018/08/02/new-york-times-hires-racist-to-join-its-editorial-board/
She was just responding to racist dickheads like you, giving them a taste of their own medicine.
The New York Times released a statement which read, “We hired Sarah Jeong because of the exceptional work she has done covering the internet and technology at a range of respected publications. Her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian womanHAVE MADE HER A SUBJECT OF FREQUENT ONLINE HARASSMENT. For a period of time she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers.”
Minimal wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
We need Congress to enact a citizenship verification law in order to vote.
A complete waste of money. Voter fraud is a nothing-burger. Failure to secure elections from nefarious people --Trump and his people -- is the real election problem lies. Republicans refuse to spend a single dime to protect the 2018 elections. That is all you need to know about what they believe in -- election manipulation by Russia is okay as long as that helps Republicans "win" tainted elections.
Wow, you claim voter fraud is a "nothingburger" and then say "election manipulation by Russia is ok..." Make up your mind.
The FBI was never permitted to perform a forensic investigation of the hacked DNC server.
There are illegals especially in CA that voted in Nov 2016 and before you bring up the "they don't want to risk deportation" argument, it certainly doesn't stop them from doing other crimes such burglary, murder, drug use, etc. Many get deported and come right back. Deportation is not a deterrent.
In CA, it is a crime to report on someone who is an ilegal alien:
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/threatening-to-report-someone-as-undocumented-a-crime-in-california.html