Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

hey m@gas - the generic ballot has blammed out to 9.4%.

might want to get a wetsuit ready - the blue tsunami is heading right at you.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-generic-ballot-polls/

Blue wave????

Hahahahaha!!!!!!

That’s hilarious!!!!!

Americans will continue to reject democrat open borders and attacks on Christians.

Democrats lose again.

LaughingLoudly wrote:

agip wrote:

hey m@gas - the generic ballot has blammed out to 9.4%.

might want to get a wetsuit ready - the blue tsunami is heading right at you.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-generic-ballot-polls/

Blue wave????

Hahahahaha!!!!!!

That’s hilarious!!!!!

Americans will continue to reject democrat open borders and attacks on Christians.

Democrats lose again.

Agree!

Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Puerto Rican officials lauded Trump?

https://www.newsweek.com/53-million-puerto-ricans-will-take-revenge-trump-governor-says-754711

Maybe it was the President of Puerto Rico that Trump met that day. Ha!

Like I said before, you rely heavily from Trump hating media sources and take it as gospel truth. News"weak" is in the same category as the others I listed.

Fox News has begun to see the light on Trump...at least as it pertains to the Helsinki disaster. At least Chris Wallace and Shep Smith are objective there.

There is no Trump-hating press...not mainstream stuff anyway. They just aren't butt-kissing press like SOME of Fox News and Breitbart and InfoWars...all crazy partisan sources.

CNN's Jake Tapper was very hard on Obama...not at hard as he is on Trump, but Obama wasn't chaos personified like Trump is.

An objective person can look at Trump and call him a mess.

You say Puerto Rican officials lauded Trump. Links?

Agree wrote:

LaughingLoudly wrote:

Blue wave????

Hahahahaha!!!!!!

That’s hilarious!!!!!

Americans will continue to reject democrat open borders and attacks on Christians.

Democrats lose again.

Agree!

Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!!

1) Democratic Party platform does not include open borders and never has.

2) Democratic Party platform does not include attacking Christians and never has. Most Democrats in Congress and our last President identify as Christian.

3) I would like to know what needs to happen for it NOT to be a Blue Wave? What if the Democrats just take the House but not the Senate? Is that a Blue Wave? I don't know what needs to happen for a Blue Wave to be declared, but Democrats WILL take back the House.

Flagpole wrote:

3) I would like to know what needs to happen for it NOT to be a Blue Wave? What if the Democrats just take the House but not the Senate? Is that a Blue Wave? I don't know what needs to happen for a Blue Wave to be declared, but Democrats WILL take back the House.

Trumpers did not reply to the link that showed Trump's approval on a state by state basis. Trump's approval rating in Texas is below 40%. Trump is below 50% in most states; especially those with greater House seats to fill.

Flagpole wrote:

Agree wrote:

Agree!

Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!!

1) Democratic Party platform does not include open borders and never has.

2) Democratic Party platform does not include attacking Christians and never has. Most Democrats in Congress and our last President identify as Christian.

3) I would like to know what needs to happen for it NOT to be a Blue Wave? What if the Democrats just take the House but not the Senate? Is that a Blue Wave? I don't know what needs to happen for a Blue Wave to be declared, but Democrats WILL take back the House.

Gillibrand and Warren call to abolish ICE doesn't exactly back up your claim that Democrats don't advocate for open borders. However, I will concede that they certainly don't speak for the whole party. I agree with you, there isn't open attacks on Christians by the democrat party. There may be instances when Christians feel threatened by certain things, but I would say that the attacks are from special interest groups.

As for a Blue Wave, I'm sure it will come back at some point. We go left, right, left right. That's the course of things. I just don't think it will be until like 2022. when Democrats assume any real power. But it's definitely going to happen again.

as noted wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

3) I would like to know what needs to happen for it NOT to be a Blue Wave? What if the Democrats just take the House but not the Senate? Is that a Blue Wave? I don't know what needs to happen for a Blue Wave to be declared, but Democrats WILL take back the House.

Trumpers did not reply to the link that showed Trump's approval on a state by state basis. Trump's approval rating in Texas is below 40%. Trump is below 50% in most states; especially those with greater House seats to fill.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/226454/trump-approval-highest-west-virginia-lowest-vermont.aspx

winning

These same polls all had Hillary with yuuuge leads up to Election Day 2016. Massive fail.

yesIguess wrote:

Take if from a guy in recruiting and HR. We are hiring because of Trump and the republicans economic policy. Obama did not ruin the economy, but he sure as hell did not help it grow.

Lol! Yes, that's where I go for my economic policy analysis: The HR department.

You've got a problem with government attempting to influence the direction of the energy sector? What do you call giving huge incentives to the coal and oil and gas industries? Developing clean energy means more manufacturing jobs, better public health, and more long-term economic stability. The auto bailout saved 1.5 million jobs and the industry helped lead the recovery. It is simply INSANE that you would have a problem with that.

You think requiring employers to pay their employees a living wage/more money if they work overtime (thereby reducing the amount of government/taxpayer assistance they require) is an "assault" on businesses? Of course you do, you're in HR.

Obama did not "crush corporations with excessive tax rates." The federal corporate tax rate did not increase at all while he was in office, and corporate profits SOARED while he was in office. Not to mention he went shamefully easy on the financial sector when banks deserved to be broken up and hundreds of people deserved to be dumped behind bars for white collar crime.

The notion that jobs "fled the country" under Obama is completely asinine. After Republicans tanked the economy, Obama presided over YEARS of consistent monthly job creation (again, you ALL said these numbers were FAKE, so you can't boast about them now). The slowdown in productivity is an extremely complex issue and cannot credibly be pinned on Obama. Nobody totally understands it. There's the recession, the changing composition of the labor force, rising monopoly power, lack of workforce investment, entry barriers, etc.

Take pride in record consumer spending while you still can. Construction industry productivity is low, and Republicans have stifled infrastructure development for years. Business investment is also low and the idea that a tax cut will stimulate it was always nonsense. Businesses don't invest just because they see a tax benefit, they invest because they expect to see a profit. That money is going to stock buybacks instead. A consumer-driven economy will only work as long as consumers can/want to access debt, and that debt is currently at record levels. It's not sustainable.

yesIguess wrote:

The modern republican party is, in principle, strong on state's rights and individual liberties, with a limited government. .

You'd have a point, except, the Right is always legislating how voters should think and act. And then there's the other problem of the countless big government boondoggles the Right has engineered.

In this moment in time, the chief idiot is demanding price controls, and interfering in trade, and growing government with enormous federal debt. Should I mention Kansas' economic failure using your broken small government theories for the 10th time?

I know, facts are irrelevant.

Welcome to Mexifornia. Illegal aliens will be allowed to vote in San Francisco for local elections. This is just another step toward illegal voting allowed in Statewide and/or National elections.

http://abc7news.com/politics/sf-department-of-elections-issues-voter-registration-forms-for-non-citizens/3773817/

yesIguess wrote:

Gillibrand and Warren call to abolish ICE doesn't exactly back up your claim that Democrats don't advocate for open borders.

Right, because before ICE was created in 2003, the US had an open borders immigration policy.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

as noted wrote:

Trumpers did not reply to the link that showed Trump's approval on a state by state basis. Trump's approval rating in Texas is below 40%. Trump is below 50% in most states; especially those with greater House seats to fill.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/226454/trump-approval-highest-west-virginia-lowest-vermont.aspx

winning

These same polls all had Hillary with yuuuge leads up to Election Day 2016. Massive fail.

the polls said hillary was ahead by around 3% and yeah she won by around 3% in the vote.

polls were spot-on, nationally.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

winning

These same polls all had Hillary with yuuuge leads up to Election Day 2016. Massive fail.

the polls said hillary was ahead by around 3% and yeah she won by around 3% in the vote.

polls were spot-on, nationally.

Rigged does not understand the difference between a national poll and state polls. So he proves his ignorance by taking state data and turning into a national result. That Gallup poll map should scare the crap out Trumpers. The Trump approval > 50% states are the smallest states in the USA.

Flagpole wrote:

3) I would like to know what needs to happen for it NOT to be a Blue Wave? What if the Democrats just take the House but not the Senate? Is that a Blue Wave? I don't know what needs to happen for a Blue Wave to be declared, but Democrats WILL take back the House.

Of course, even if a Blue Wave does materialize (and it will), it won't necessarily be recognizable given the the anti-democratic nature of our country.

"Even if Democrats were to win every single 2018 House and Senate race for seats representing places that Hillary Clinton won or that Trump won by less than 3 percentage points — a pretty good midterm by historical standards — they could still fall short of the House majority and lose five Senate seats."

Just gross.

Here's Putin's b*tch:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiMabJQUwAAZbeC.jpg

1. A few pages ago, somebody here praised Socialist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as the new face of the Democrat party. She has called for called for the abolition of ICE. She said America wasn’t founded on capitalism and called Israel an “occupation” force over the Palestinian territories. She is a far left-wing lunatic and so far out-of-touch with most Americans. For a good laugh, please google Miss Teen South Carolina 2007. Ocasio-Cortez' performance on camera was just as cringe worthy.

2. I agree that some Democrats are Christians.

3. A Blue Wave only applies if the entire Congress gets a Dem majority.

https://nypost.com/2018/07/18/lieberman-knocks-ocasio-cortez-as-too-far-left-for-democrats/

The vast majority of economists agree that growth was stifled during his presidency. Don't take it from me, I'm just in HR. You don't see Conservatives blindly defending Bush. I don't know why you fools continue to do it for Obama. Don't even get me started on his foreign policy. Thanks for the input thought, Gallant Man Pig. Always appreciated it. If you have a complaint just get with employee relations and we'll look into it.

RIGGED is DUMB wrote:

agip wrote:

the polls said hillary was ahead by around 3% and yeah she won by around 3% in the vote.

polls were spot-on, nationally.

Rigged does not understand the difference between a national poll and state polls. So he proves his ignorance by taking state data and turning into a national result. That Gallup poll map should scare the crap out Trumpers. The Trump approval > 50% states are the smallest states in the USA.

Ok, Mister Zero Percent Chance Jr, care to make a wager that Trump loses in 2020?

You do post with a reasonable voice now and then, so I both appreciate and acknowledge that. I agree with you that Warren and Gillibrand don't necessarily speak for the Party...they don't speak for me on this issue for sure. I was a big supporter of Obama, and he was the "Deporter In Chief".

I also agree with you that we swing from left to right and back again...that is the normal course of things. I always laugh when I hear people say "Democrats will be in power forever" or "Republicans will be in power forever". Just doesn't happen.

I am looking for someone to define Blue Wave. I believe Democrats take back the House in November, but not so sure they will take the Senate though it is possible. Does that qualify as a Blue Wave? Not sure. What if the Democrats take the House easily and the Senate barely? Is that a Blue Wave? Again, not sure what it has to be to be a Blue Wave.

Here's another one sweetheart.