well sure some people wanted a big change. I'd say most did not. Most trump voters are wealthy, educated and doing very well. They just hate liberals. they aren't looking for a revolution, they just really really hate liberals.
well sure some people wanted a big change. I'd say most did not. Most trump voters are wealthy, educated and doing very well. They just hate liberals. they aren't looking for a revolution, they just really really hate liberals.
Vivalarepublica wrote:
What's amazing is that the Republican Party of federalism, of small government, of states right, is now intent on using the heavy hand of the federal government to carry out their agenda.
Whatever is politicallu expedient at the moment, I guess.
Not really..............what Trump is doing is bringing things back to center (and hopefully a bit to the right of center), and it seems, he's actually looking to enforce EXISTING federal immigration law. I also don't know whats wrong with the deportation of illegals who commit crimes, or the elimination of federal funds from those cities that provide illegals with "sanctuary", and who refuse to work with ICE in violation of EXISTING federal law. The far left agenda implemented by the last 8 years of the Obama administration, quite a bit by which was done by executive action is the root cause of most of this. Whats good for the goose, is good for the gander or so the expression goes.
Yea, I mostly agree, but I meet a lot of liberals that don't have a clue about economics, fiscal policy, and good government management.
I think human nature drifts towards authoritarianism and appearance of "strong" leadership (which usually is a mask for fear and insecurity). Gray areas are too complex for many human minds, but black/white absolutes are much easier to comprehend. You made a good point about blind political affliations. Look at how many of us blindly follow top down religions. Look at the state of democracy around the world: Most of the world's population lives in non-Democratic states, the Economist Intelligence Unit just downgraded the level of democracy in the USA, and they estimate that only 5% of the world lives in a strong democracy.
In fact, the idea of strong, liberal, eglatarian, abundant democracies could be a 20th century blip on the radar in human history. We might as well get used to autocracy. Off-grid living also seems more appealing everyday.
Well, debating Trumps actions at this point don't really matter, nor will my "smartness" or lack thereof in your eyes. I really could care less. Because what the libs fear most.......border control, welfare reform, a positive business climate, tax cuts, law enforcement, a strong military, support of the 2nd Amendment, a strong conservative on the SCOTUS etc. is well on the way to becoming reality. Don't like it? Tough. Organize, mobilize, get out the vote in four years to make a change...............or don't.
clearly you are not aware that Obama deported more illegals than any other recent president, that illegal immigration has been dropping like a rock, and the number of illegals in the USA has been falling.
trump is a grab bag. The crazy right wing insanity is banning muslims, lying to our faces over and over and insisting that is fine and dandy to do so, saying the press is all lies, threatening to jail opponents, campaigning against free speech, freedom of religion and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, advocating for war crimes, threatenning to withdraw from alliances, etc.
this is not centrist at all - it is latin american caudillo idiocy. And if you overlook it and just roll your eyes you are part of a major problem.
"really could care less"
you just said you care about my views on your intelligence. Try using sentences that mean what you think they mean, ok?
***shaking my head and trumpers***
I am certainly aware, and in reality Billy Boy Clinton was the most strict in my recent memory. I had several INS audits of my I9's by his minions. BUT, my beef is with the cities/states that refuse to interact with ICE, particularly when crimes are committed by illegals. Don't like trumps policies? Organize, mobilize, get out the vote in 4 years. or don't.
Link please about Obama deporting more illegals than any other president?
trumpers are trumpers wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:Well, debating Trumps actions at this point don't really matter, nor will my "smartness" or lack thereof in your eyes. I really could care less. Because what the libs fear most.......border control, welfare reform, a positive business climate, tax cuts, law enforcement, a strong military, support of the 2nd Amendment, a strong conservative on the SCOTUS etc. is well on the way to becoming reality. Don't like it? Tough. Organize, mobilize, get out the vote in four years to make a change...............or don't.
"really could care less"
you just said you care about my views on your intelligence. Try using sentences that mean what you think they mean, ok?
***shaking my head and trumpers***
Don't like trumps policies? Organize, mobilize, get out the vote in 4 years. or don't.
Read more:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=8017990&page=16#ixzz4Wt5fMsVohttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661Objectively wrote:
trumpers are trumpers wrote:clearly you are not aware that Obama deported more illegals than any other recent president, that illegal immigration has been dropping like a rock, and the number of illegals in the USA has been falling.
trump is a grab bag. The crazy right wing insanity is banning muslims, lying to our faces over and over and insisting that is fine and dandy to do so, saying the press is all lies, threatening to jail opponents, campaigning against free speech, freedom of religion and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, advocating for war crimes, threatenning to withdraw from alliances, etc.
this is not centrist at all - it is latin american caudillo idiocy. And if you overlook it and just roll your eyes you are part of a major problem.
Link please about Obama deporting more illegals than any other president?
"According to governmental data, the Obama administration has deported more people than any other president's administration in history.
In fact, they have deported more than the sum of all the presidents of the 20th century.
President George W. Bush's administration deported just over two million during his time in office; and Obama’s numbers don’t reflect his last year in office, for which data is not yet available."
There is something wrong with Donald Trump's brain. Do conservatives really not see this, or do they just not care because he's helping them get what they want?
"That speech was a home run. That speech, if you look at Fox, OK, I'll mention you -- we see what Fox said. They said it was one of the great speeches. They showed the people applauding and screaming and -- and they were all CIA. There was -- somebody was asking Sean -- "Well, were they Trump people that were put--" we don't have Trump people. They were CIA people.
That location was given to me. Mike Pence went up before me, paid great homage to the wall. I then went up, paid great homage to the wall. I then spoke to the crowd. I got a standing ovation. In fact, they said it was the biggest standing ovation since Peyton Manning had won the Super Bowl and they said it was equal. I got a standing ovation. It lasted for a long period of time. What you do is take -- take out your tape -- you probably ran it live. I know when I do good speeches. I know when I do bad speeches. That speech was a total home run. They loved it. I could've ...
People loved it. They loved it. They gave me a standing ovation for a long period of time. They never even sat down, most of them, during the speech. There was love in the room. You and other networks covered it very inaccurately. I hate to say this to you and you probably won't put it on but turn on Fox and see how it was covered. And see how people respond to that speech.
That speech was a good speech. And you and a couple of other networks tried to downplay that speech. And it was very, very unfortunate that you did. The people of the CIA loved the speech. If I was going to take a vote in that room, there were, like, 300, 350 people, over 1,000 wanted to be there but they couldn't. They were all CIA people. I would say I would've gotten 350 to nothing in that room. That's what the vote would've been. That speech was a big hit, a big success -- success. And then I came back and I watched you on television and a couple of others."
it's a team thing. Did the Yankees lose any fans when ARod proved to be a doper? Did many A Rod fans desert him? i doubt it.
as for that speech, of course the only people applauding were apparently from the Trump entourage, bussed in for the event. the career CIA guys were stonefaced.
Vivalarepublica wrote:
What's amazing is that the Republican Party of federalism, of small government, of states right, is now intent on using the heavy hand of the federal government to carry out their agenda.
Whatever is politicallu expedient at the moment, I guess.
Holy fck you are stupid!
The only purpose of the Federal Government is to protect its citizens. So yes the Federal Government should be used to carry out that "agenda."
You libbbtards are some dumb mother fckrs😂
the entire senior staff of the state department just quit.
this is not normal
I suspect weird authoritarian stuff is happening in all the departments. Trump will do such massive damage to this nation. That's what happens when a trump type candidate trashes trashes trashes a nation's institutions.
Trump came out in favor of torture and other war crimes in an interview last night, in which he again proved himself to be a raving narcissist and serial liar. The entire state department senior staff just quit (Leadership!), U.S. relations with Mexico are deteriorating quickly, Trump's press secretary just tweeted out his own password, and word is out that Trump has significant business interests in some of the countries (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan) he conspicuously left out of his "Terrorism Prone" Muslim Nation Ban.
This is all in less than 24 hours, folks, and Republicans in state legislatures are proposing laws across the nation to criminalize peaceful protests.
But hey, this is just something we need to work around if we want to keep trannies out of the wrong bathroom.
The Bible Made Me Do It wrote:
There is something wrong with Donald Trump's brain. Do conservatives really not see this, or do they just not care because he's helping them get what they want?
I'm starting to think there is. I've been reading interviews with his biographers and long time reporters that covered him, and they say none of this is surprising and expect more of the same. If you're interested, look up Mike D'Antonio, Tony Schwartz, and the podcast The Run Up with episodes The Trump Tapes.
I also read the transcript of the interview with ABC News this morning. Holy crap. I thought there was a method to his madness, but now I believe he might actually be psychologically unfit for office. Nothing we haven't seen already, but the ignorance, need for attention, the obsession is his own rankings and public perception, disdain for facts and understanding, sensitivity to any criticism were out there in plain sight in his own words.
Conservatives in Congress know that he won't look at the details of anything that comes across his desk and doesn't care about the outcomes. They will use him to sign off on stuff, rile up supporters, and intimidate the media as long as he is useful.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:What is clear is that the folks who elected him do not want a "middle of the road" President. They want someone who will actually do the things that were campaigned on. Whether you agree or disagree, things will get done.
Are you imagining "things" that benefit Trump's voters? Right now, Trump's tirades against the country of Mexico is costing quite a few American farmers very serious trouble. The average homeowner just got a very bad deal with housing prices now set to decline. If Trump has his way with trade, many ordinary things are set to cost Americans much more.
Finally, how was Obama to get anything done with both houses of Congress opposing him? For example, Republicans refused to spend their way out of the depression at great personal expense to the average voter. Instead of a WPA-type program, we got Cash for Clunkers.
Trump still has to deal with Congress. That's going to be fun to watch.
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:
Vivalarepublica wrote:What's amazing is that the Republican Party of federalism, of small government, of states right, is now intent on using the heavy hand of the federal government to carry out their agenda.
Whatever is politicallu expedient at the moment, I guess.
Holy fck you are stupid!
The only purpose of the Federal Government is to protect its citizens. So yes the Federal Government should be used to carry out that "agenda."
You libbbtards are some dumb mother fckrs😂
Luv ya, man!
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
Trump came out in favor of torture and other war crimes in an interview last night, in which he again proved himself to be a raving narcissist and serial liar. The entire state department senior staff just quit (Leadership!), U.S. relations with Mexico are deteriorating quickly, Trump's press secretary just tweeted out his own password, and word is out that Trump has significant business interests in some of the countries (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan) he conspicuously left out of his "Terrorism Prone" Muslim Nation Ban.
This is all in less than 24 hours, folks, and Republicans in state legislatures are proposing laws across the nation to criminalize peaceful protests.
But hey, this is just something we need to work around if we want to keep trannies out of the wrong bathroom.
I did see some things following November's unrest, but that was disruptive protest (blocking highways and such without a permit). Sources on peaceful protests?
I'm not sure how good a source this is, but this is what that poster was talking about.
https://theintercept.com/2017/01/19/republican-lawmakers-in-five-states-propose-bills-to-criminalize-peaceful-protest/RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Rest in Peace Adrian Lehmann - 2:11 Swiss marathoner. Dies of heart attack.
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
I think Letesenbet Gidey might be trying to break 14 this Saturday
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!