Flagpole wrote:
Yep...this is true. Like I said.
LOL @ Flagpole
Oh, and Ohio in general.
Oh, and people that can't understand basic concepts like probability.
Flagpole wrote:
Yep...this is true. Like I said.
LOL @ Flagpole
Oh, and Ohio in general.
Oh, and people that can't understand basic concepts like probability.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
exthrower wrote:We finally have a 'leader'....Not a spineless community organizer....
Dropping random bombs random places is effective foreign policy now? Because your spineless community organizer was doing that too. Since he wasn't your supreme fascist leader, I guess it doesn't count.
Please tell me how dropping random bombs meets America's geopolitical goals. Wait, we have no goals besides elevating celebrity, so I guess there's no question.
Yep. Lame. The ONE thing I agreed with Trumpsters on was that we could no longer be the world's policeman. Just too expensive and too impossible. And, of course biased to the nth degree. The US couldn't care less what happens in Africa, but some children are gassed in Syria and we go bomb them within hours. I thought Trump wanted to take care of our problems here in the US and not bother with this interventionism. I guess the answer to those problems is on the golf course.
for the record, I agree with Trump on several issues
-reform corporate tax system
-deregulation of business
-rethinking of alliances/treaties to make sure they are up to date. he's actually changed some of my thinking on that one.
I can't think of much more.
As for our being the worlds' policeman...it's an ugly, impossible job...but let's face it...it keeps the peace. There is no coincidence that the 1945-2017 period of American military dominance has seen a steady fall in combat fatalities around the world and a giant, massive leap upward in health and wealth around the world.
World cop can't be done perfectly, but it can be done to some degree, and our being in that role has been immensely beneficial to the planet and to America.
hey send a link! enlighten me!
but if it is from a right wing propaganda source I won't even open it.
Agip you are a huge 💩
A smelly 💩 is exactly who and what you are😂😂😂
You remember your "battle cry?"
"Donald Trump will NEVER be POTUS!" -agip
You 💩
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Remember when liberals were called "hysterical" for speculating that leaving foreign policy in Trump's small, incompetent hands could result in nuclear war? It all seems so long ago, doesn't it?
Remember when you libbbtwats declared that no way Donald Trump defeats POShitlery in the elections?😂😂
It seems just like yesterday you libbbtwats were DECIMATED😂😂😂😂😂
I enjoy coming to this thread and seeing first hand the libbbbtwat decimation on a daily basis. It is like a huge power source; knowing that We The People defeated the NAZI v2.0...it feels good...decimating real evil.
😎🇺🇸
eric a blair wrote:
Veteran one wrote:Oh my god- are you that dense? You can't do basic root cause analysis? You can't vote the "bad leaders" out if you don't know the truth [because of the aforementioned "perpetual lying, deceiving, hiding evidence, cheating, etc to the population to further their own agenda."
Again, THAT is undermining democracy.
hey send a link! enlighten me!
but if it is from a right wing propaganda source I won't even open it.
Ever heard of Wikileaks, you intellectually-challenged douche?
What is wrong with you? wrote:
eric a blair wrote:hey send a link! enlighten me!
but if it is from a right wing propaganda source I won't even open it.
Ever heard of Wikileaks, you intellectually-challenged douche?
just saying 'wikileaks' doesn't evidence "perpetually lying, deceiving, hiding evidence, cheating, etc to the population to further their own agenda"
seriously. All I got out of the DNC wikilieaks docs is that the DNC wanted HRC to win because they thought she had a better chance to win and be a better president. Which is totally true. There is no evidence they did anything major to undermine Sanders.
But if I'm missing something that shows perpetual lyying and deceiving, please please show me.
eric a blair wrote:
What is wrong with you? wrote:Ever heard of Wikileaks, you intellectually-challenged douche?
just saying 'wikileaks' doesn't evidence "perpetually lying, deceiving, hiding evidence, cheating, etc to the population to further their own agenda"
seriously. All I got out of the DNC wikilieaks docs is that the DNC wanted HRC to win because they thought she had a better chance to win and be a better president. Which is totally true. There is no evidence they did anything major to undermine Sanders.
But if I'm missing something that shows perpetual lyying and deceiving, please please show me.
Oh you mean like getting the questions to a presidential election debate before the debate?
Or by planting and using children in a faux town hall Q&A?
Or maybe blaming a YouTube video on a planned terrorist attack on an American Ambassador?
You are such a 💩 Agip.
You truly are a piece of $hit😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
well wrote:
eric a blair wrote:On a different thread a guy quoted Arendt on people like you - who just want a leader, and don't care what he says or thinks. If I were you I would be embarassed to support a guy who 90 days in has reversed almost everything he campaigned on. But I think about policy, etc. While you just want a big man in charge.
You are the reason so often people vote out democracy. Like happened yesterday in Turkey.
You sir and people like you are the biggest threat to American democracy.
But you won't even reflect on that - you'll send poop emojis my way instead.
It's a wonder democracy lasts.
In fairness to "exthrower", he isn't the one who sends poop emojis
Maybe.
Did you ever notice how exthrower's posts are as content-free as DFF? It is not obvious to me that they are not one and the same person.
there's certainly a lot of double handling on this thread
I have a pet theory that Flagpole is one of the trolls
eric a blair wrote:
there's certainly a lot of double handling on this thread
I have a pet theory that Flagpole is one of the trolls
You haven't fooled anyone with your last 2x posts with different handles "agip."😂😂😂
You 💩
First Easter Egg Roll handled with no fatalities. Congratulations on a job well done, Trump family.
Let's put the HRC debate question thing to rest. HRC did not receive the questions to any debate. Donna Brazile seemed to have some inside information on what some questions might be at one town hall in the primary. But mostly, the info she passed to the HRC campaign was off the mark and would have been of little use.
Brazile claims that she didn't have access to any actual questions and the stolen WikiLeaks emails prove it (despite the hyped headline).
Ok, the only OTHER reason Trump wanted to be President is in this link:
eric a blair wrote:
just saying 'wikileaks' doesn't evidence "perpetually lying, deceiving, hiding evidence, cheating, etc to the population to further their own agenda"
seriously. All I got out of the DNC wikilieaks docs is that the DNC wanted HRC to win because they thought she had a better chance to win and be a better president. Which is totally true. There is no evidence they did anything major to undermine Sanders.
But if I'm missing something that shows perpetual lyying and deceiving, please please show me.
Three books that would in all likelihood change your perception of our government and which I would recommend checking out are:
Tragedy and Hope 101: The Illusion of Justice, Freedom and Democracy by Joseph Plummer (summary of Carroll Quigley's earlier and denser book, which is also worth checking out. Quigley was a Harvard professor of history and a mentor to Bill Clinton.)
Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation by Patrick Wood
The Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve by G. Edward Griffin
The Republican Party establishment is just as dirty as the DNC. If hypothetically an outsider, like Ross Perot were running for the Democrats and Jeb Bush was running for the Republicans, those in power would have been pulling out all the stops to help Bush win the election.
Fat hurts wrote:
Let's put the HRC debate question thing to rest. HRC did not receive the questions to any debate. Donna Brazile seemed to have some inside information on what some questions might be at one town hall in the primary. But mostly, the info she passed to the HRC campaign was off the mark and would have been of little use.
Brazile claims that she didn't have access to any actual questions and the stolen WikiLeaks emails prove it (despite the hyped headline).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/31/hacked-emails-suggest-trump-was-right-after-all-clinton-got-previews-of-some-debate-questions/?utm_term=.d856b81ce643
Please stop with the nonsense.
http://www.salon.com/2017/03/20/finally-donna-brazile-apologizes-for-passing-debate-questions-during-clinton-sanders-primary-battles/Fat hurts wrote:
Let's put the HRC debate question thing to rest. HRC did not receive the questions to any debate. Donna Brazile seemed to have some inside information on what some questions might be at one town hall in the primary. But mostly, the info she passed to the HRC campaign was off the mark and would have been of little use.
Brazile claims that she didn't have access to any actual questions and the stolen WikiLeaks emails prove it (despite the hyped headline).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/31/hacked-emails-suggest-trump-was-right-after-all-clinton-got-previews-of-some-debate-questions/?utm_term=.d856b81ce643
Please stop with the nonsense. On top of that, everything that Trump has said has turned out to be true.
http://www.salon.com/2017/03/20/finally-donna-brazile-apologizes-for-passing-debate-questions-during-clinton-sanders-primary-battles/itbaddude wrote:
Please stop with the nonsense. On top of that, everything that Trump has said has turned out to be true.
Really? Everything?
Why is anyone surprised questions are being passed to candidates? Do you understand the ENTIRE "debate" is a carefully constructed show by both parties? There are literally no secrets. Zip. Zilch. Nada.