Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

L L wrote:

So what is expected from this meeting with the Koreans?

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

L L wrote:

L L wrote:

So what is expected from this meeting with the Koreans?

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

whatever would own the libs most, is what they hope for.

L L wrote:

L L wrote:

So what is expected from this meeting with the Koreans?

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

Wow you're a pothead! If Obama went to the same meeting, would you have been asking the same of him? Liberal sour grapes loser, can't find any good in anything, unless it's someone from their side. How ignorant are you? Do you really think you conjured up an intelligent post that would baffle anyone on the right? I think you post just to re-read your words over and over, gosh I'm such a smart liberal.

L L wrote:

L L wrote:

So what is expected from this meeting with the Koreans?

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

It has to be permanent, verifiable denuclearization. I think Trump's team has been pretty clear on that. Secondary issues are human rights, trade, and freedom of the press type stuff.

DiscoGary wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

...

Please don’t start making your way around the track for another victory lap until he actually accomplishes something.

....

We'll Trump scored a big victory with NK when Democrats start giving credit to Obama.

You're right Gary! Then the liberals want to "GO BACK" in time and give credit to someone that they don't want brought up. Talk about flipping for your own convenience. You Democrats make my day as I smile from ear to ear reading your whining comments over the election loss over a year and a half ago.

agip wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

NK will likely get lowered sanctions today for continued development of long range nukes tomorrow. The Trump/Pompeo brain trust will see this as a big win.

maybe

seems clear that NK wants to stall for time right now - seems that they blew up their nuclear test site and need a few years to build a new one. So for now they'll play ball. And probably keep working on a new nuclear site underground.

So NK will probably agree to some multi-year arrangement...rice now, inspections later....then when they get the nuke center up and running abrogate the agreement.

I think we are agreeing.

There is no proof they blew up their test site. The blew something up, but it makes more sense that they didn’t give up the goods without getting something in return. Why would they destroy the only bargaining chip they have. Agree they will VERBALLY agree to something, but it will not include site inspectors. It will include financial aid. If Kim is smart he will use Trump’s desperation to look like a winner to NK’s advantage. NK can’t get any worse so they have nothing to lose.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

It has to be permanent, verifiable denuclearization. I think Trump's team has been pretty clear on that. Secondary issues are human rights, trade, and freedom of the press type stuff.

But no matter what happens, your media will portray it as a gigantic failure so there's no suspense for you.

No proof? Gosh you are one dumb lefty. Every learn to think?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Obama’s record on the economy speaks for itself. Your empty statement is meaningless without support. Again, where is your proof of all this losing for so many decades? We would all love to see it and get with the program.

Less than a 3% annual GDP growth rate. the worst ever for a peace-time president. Hang your hat on that.

Very weak to cherry pick - how about setting us up for one of the longest running economic and stock market rallies in history, how about the steadily improving unemployment rate, how about all that after leading us out of our second worst economic calamity in history? If that’s all you got then you have very little. And how about talking about Trump for once instead of pointing to your perceived failures of Obama and Hillary, who are completely irrelevant today.

DiscoGary wrote:

But no matter what happens, your media will portray it as a gigantic failure so there's no suspense for you.

Your preferred media is #1 FAKE NEW outlet, Fox News.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

It has to be permanent, verifiable denuclearization. I think Trump's team has been pretty clear on that. Secondary issues are human rights, trade, and freedom of the press type stuff.

You know that's not going to happen from this meeting.

So I will assume that you mean that this meeting will be the first step towards that.

And I would be very skeptical of what verifiable denuclearization would mean or how the process would go.

I guess something like the Iran deal that Trump got out of would be a good start.

Would you accept a piece of paper with Kim signing it as a success?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

It looks like you have examined proof that the US finances other economies and gets very little back relative to what we give - yes, a zero sum global economy with our slice of the GDP pie ever decreasing. Please share this proof from economic experts with us, we would all love to see the light like you and stand up to the deep state and evil globalist regimes.

I take that you want to return to the days when Obama was bending over and allowing other countries having their way with us. No thanks.

You deflect to Obama and yet there is this.

Yes, there is collusion.

Flynn Thing

Manafort Thing

Tillerson Thing

Sessions Thing

Kushner Thing

Wray Thing

Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius "Russian Law Firm of the Year" Thing

Carter Page Thing

Roger Stone Thing

Felix Sater Thing

Boris Epshteyn Thing

Rosneft Thing

Gazprom Thing (see above)

Sergey Gorkov banker Thing

Azerbaijan Thing

"I Love Putin" Thing

Lavrov Thing

Sergey Kislyak Thing

Oval Office Thing

Gingrich Kislyak Phone Calls Thing

Russian Business Interest Thing

Emoluments Clause Thing

Alex Schnaider Thing

Hack of the DNC Thing

Guccifer 2.0 Thing

Mike Pence "I don't know anything" Thing

Russians Mysteriously Dying Thing

Trump's public request to Russia to hack Hillary's email Thing

Trump house sale for $100 million at the bottom of the housing bust to the Russian fertilizer king Thing

Russian fertilizer king's plane showing up in Concord, NC during Trump rally campaign Thing

Nunes sudden flight to the White House in the night Thing

Nunes personal investments in the Russian winery Thing

Cyprus bank Thing

Trump not Releasing his Tax Returns Thing

the Republican Party's rejection of an amendment to require Trump to show his taxes thing

Election Hacking Thing

GOP platform change to the Ukraine Thing

Steele Dossier Thing

Sally Yates Can't Testify Thing

Intelligence Community's Investigative Reports Thing

Trump reassurance that the Russian connection is all "fake news" Thing

Chaffetz not willing to start an Investigation Thing

Chaffetz suddenly deciding to go back to private life in the middle of an investigation Thing

Appointment of Pam Bondi who was bribed by Trump in the Trump University scandal appointed to head the investigation Thing The White House going into cover-up mode, refusing to turn over the documents related to the hiring and firing of Flynn Thing

Chaffetz and White House blaming the poor vetting of Flynn on Obama Thing

Poland and British intelligence gave information regarding the hacking back in 2015 to Paul Ryan and he didn't do anything Thing

Agent MI6 following the money thing

Trump team KNEW about Flynn's involvement but hired him anyway Thing

Let's Fire Comey Thing

Election night Russian trademark gifts Things

Russian diplomatic compound electronic equipment destruction Thing

let's give back the diplomatic compounds back to the Russians Thing

Let's Back Away From Cuba Thing

Donny Jr met with Russians Thing

Donny Jr emails details "Russian Government's support for Trump" Thing

Trump's secret second meeting with his boss Putin Thing

L L wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

It has to be permanent, verifiable denuclearization. I think Trump's team has been pretty clear on that. Secondary issues are human rights, trade, and freedom of the press type stuff.

You know that's not going to happen from this meeting.

So I will assume that you mean that this meeting will be the first step towards that.

And I would be very skeptical of what verifiable denuclearization would mean or how the process would go.

I guess something like the Iran deal that Trump got out of would be a good start.

Would you accept a piece of paper with Kim signing it as a success?

I'm really not interested in having this discussion with someone who hopes Trump fails. We all know how difficult it will be to make this work, so playing some gotcha game with expectations is helpful. I CAN guarantee that Trump won't be handing over money, food, or anything else without at least some movement on NK's part. That's what's been missing in these negotiations in the past.

One thing is certain, liberals are scared to DEATH that Trump will find a way to make lasting peace with a denuked NK. That is their worst nightmare. It will be hard to spin that one as a negative or to give credit to Obama. They'll try, but it won't work and they know it already.

DiscoGary wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

It has to be permanent, verifiable denuclearization. I think Trump's team has been pretty clear on that. Secondary issues are human rights, trade, and freedom of the press type stuff.

But no matter what happens, your media will portray it as a gigantic failure so there's no suspense for you.

I just think he wants anything that might get him a Nobel Peace prize so he can rub it in Obama's face. I can probably accurately predict the entire rest of Trump's presidency because he has the mentality of a 5 year old.

Wow! There are more dead ends in the Liberal Media Rat Maze than I ever imagined.

L.L wrote:

L L wrote:

Looking for a Trump supporters response this question now.

Wow you're a pothead! If Obama went to the same meeting, would you have been asking the same of him? Liberal sour grapes loser, can't find any good in anything, unless it's someone from their side. How ignorant are you? Do you really think you conjured up an intelligent post that would baffle anyone on the right? I think you post just to re-read your words over and over, gosh I'm such a smart liberal.

Libs are like Bill Maher, they would go along with his statement: “I hope for a recession to get rid of Trump. Sorry if that hurts people.”

Wishing Trump to fail is a symptom of TDS.

just to be clear, there were two blowsings ups.

1) The NKers supposedly purposefully blew up some tunnels. That is dubious.

2) Their nuke mountain test site seems to have collapsed. No proof on that either, but it seems to have happened since the news came from elsewhere, not NK.

My point is that since their nuke mountain collapsed they will need some time to build a new site. So they are using these negotiations to buy time.

And also this kid Kim of course needs to cement his leadership - a 1:1 meeting with POTUS will do the job nicely.

DiscoGary wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

It has to be permanent, verifiable denuclearization. I think Trump's team has been pretty clear on that. Secondary issues are human rights, trade, and freedom of the press type stuff.

But no matter what happens, your media will portray it as a gigantic failure so there's no suspense for you.

Gary, you are choosing to see that angle. As a liberal, I frequent the left-wing sites and news and yes there is plenty of editorial bias but most have actually given him credit for bringing the issue to the table and trying to do something different. Personally, I think this is a net positive even if nothing is accomplished, unless of course the end result is that the situation in the region worsens more than before his involvement.

I'd like the people of North Korea to have a better life and have access to what the rest of the world can provide.

And I'd like South Korea and Japan to feel relief of a nuclear threat from the crazy North Korean leader who kills his own family members for not showing full devotion and respect to him.

If Trump can make this happen, even in his whacky unconventional way, it would be a good thing.

I can admit that the unemployment rat in the US is good right now.

People that hated Obama (like Trump) never gave credit for the steady drop in unemployment under his watch. They kept talking about "real "unemployment, the labor participation rate that include students, early retirees, stay at home parents, etc.

I would not root for Trump to fail if it is bad for the US.

I'm pressing you to give your view of what success would be.

If denuclearization is your view of success, then he's gonna fail.

So I'm giving you a chance to define something more realistic that can be a success.