DiscoGary wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
...
Mr. Zero Percent chance wouldn't budge one iota even after his precious 13 Keys went against him- which is unequivocal proof that he is the supreme example a shrill partisan willfully blind to the evidence presented .
...
This
The 13 keys presented to me that there are a few in there that are more subjective than I previously had thought, and when looking at them, I can still see a way that they could be interpreted to make Hillary the winner, WHICH according to the keys she was...keep reading...
Alan Lichtman was flip flopping a little bit on what the keys were telling him, and technically his keys failed him, because they are supposed to predict who wins the popular vote[\b]. Now, to his credit, from Sept. 2016 on he said he thought Trump would win the election though he admitted he was less sure about this election than ones previous, but his keys were wrong about its main focus...winning the popular vote.
Now, he goes around still as the guy who predicted a Trump win, and while technically he did, his keys didn't do exactly as they said they would...pick the winner of the popular vote (which is USUALLY the winner of the election).
If you read his book, you will see that he is very proud of the fact that his keys don't involve regional politics, and he says they don't need to...they just predict the winner of the nationwide popular vote, and therefore almost always the electoral college winner and therefore election winner. So, LICHTMAN was kind of in a weird situation regarding the 2016 election.
1) He SAID that Trump would win. He was CORRECT!
2) He SAID his keys predicted that Trump would win. That was INCORRECT!
3) His KEYS predicted that Hillary would win the popular vote (which is what the keys are a prediction for). His KEYS were CORRECT!