Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Don't jump to conclusions, Flagpole.

Pence's Army physician, Dr Jennifer Pena, is envious of Ronny Jackson's career rise in the Navy. She has also been accused of sexual harassment.

https://saraacarter.com/vp-pence-physcian-behind-ronny-jackson-attacks/https://armydocwhistleblower.blogspot.com/2010/08/department-of-defense-inspector-general.html?m=1

Dude, if that's true, then that is bad too. Do any people with integrity work for this administration in ANY capacity?

It is a hot mess in that White House...more than a hot mess. We need a new term.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Yawn.

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

This is the work of Rudy Giuliani (and the Raskins- all former federal prosecutors), who came aboard Trump's team a couple weeks ago. Getting Mueller to show his [stale] cards like this- a week after telling Trump that he is not a target in any investigation- is significant progress in pretty short order. He said he would bring an end to this ridiculous, open-ended charade (designed to reverse an EPIC victory by a political outsider), and it appears he is doing just that.

You are wrong about this one too.

* We certainly don't know the Giuliani "got Mueller to show his cards". This list was given to Trump's legal team long before Giuliani joined.

* We don't know who leaked the questions.

* There is no indication that Mueller's investigation is near its conclusion. But keep hoping! I do think that a report on obstruction of justice is forthcoming. But the investigation into Trump/Russia ties will go on quite a bit longer. Note that there were plenty of questions about that second topic.

* We don't know that this list of questions is complete. Mueller can ask anything he wants once the interview starts. And you can bet there will be plenty of follow-up questions to each answer. The questions listed are just "conversation starters".

Note that there is not a single question about money laundering, even thought there is lots of evidence that Trump's businesses are closely entwined with dirty Russian money. My theory is that Mueller is leaving that topic to be investigated by the Southern District of New York. That's what the Cohen investigation is all about.

1) Uh, what? The entire basis of the suspicion of Manafort was that he had the connections to reach out to Russia. That is absolutely not new in any way. "...all the reporting is about outreach in the other direction" is a false statement.

So in fact, you are wrong about #1.

2) Your "wrong" accusation here is completely void of any logic. There are three parties here that all want different things. The MSM and political butthurtsters want this type of thing to get out to keep the narrative going. That's almost undeniable. They need it desperately at this point. At the same time, Trump's team wants it out in the open to prove, as I pointed out, that there's nothing here that we haven't already heard. Giuliani is there to put an end to the speculation and bring out the true status of what they [haven't found]. However, if party 3 (Mueller's team) was making great progress toward finding hard evidence, he would NOT want this in public, which was what my #2 statement was. If you're Mueller, you don't want to have to make things public to prove that you're doing... "something."

Thus, you are also wrong about #2.

Solid efforts though. LOL.

Points 1 & 2

Weak, false news, yawn, nothing burger.

How's that feel fatty? You and LL don't answer legitimate questions, then we laugh out loud at your garbage. LOL!!!

Wow, you 2 have wasted hours and hours every day on here, beyond embarrassing. You and your dribble will make no difference.

Trump is not getting impeached and Flagp0le will be all prepared with his excuses. Clinton got a free ride as she clearly lied but you liberals say "she was convicted", but you know she clearly lied unless you're a braindead turd.

Again, thanks for the bi-weekly entertainment. I'll check in 14 days from today. 50 pages will have gone by and you'll still be crying.

You are blind to what is really happening here, my friend. You are too caught up in the TDS hype.

Giuliani and the others joining Trump's team were huge positives for Trump. They know how to deal with the bullying tactics of the FBI. If there's no hard evidence by now, this thing is all but over.

DiscoGary wrote:

Could Kanye be the author of the modern day "At long last have you no shame" moment for fascist liberalism? He might have the cultural clout to pull it off.

Kanye is welcome to support the President. It isn’t the first or last time that he and I have disagreed.

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

If I'm wrong then show me the reporting.

1) Where is the reporting of the Trump campaign's outreach to Russia? It was always reported that it went the other way and you have shown nothing to contradict that. So yes, that part is new news.

2) You haven't disproved my #2 at all. You haven't even addressed it. Trump's team has had these questions in their possession for several weeks. Trump's team definitely could be the source of the leak. In that case, what Mueller wants is immaterial.

Your conclusion that Mueller's team put it out because they aren't making progress is just wishful thinking. You have zero facts to back up that assertion except your own wishful spin about the questions.

Realize that when you take a deposition, there aren't going to be many surprises in the initial questions. The whole purpose of a deposition is to get a witness on the record and under oath about facts that are already known. It's not at all surprising that there is very little new material. But like I said, even if this is an exhaustive list of questions, we don't know what follow up questions would be asked.

Nice try pal wrote:

You are blind to what is really happening here, my friend. You are too caught up in the TDS hype.

Giuliani and the others joining Trump's team were huge positives for Trump. They know how to deal with the bullying tactics of the FBI. If there's no hard evidence by now, this thing is all but over.

Keep wishing. Giuliani is not your savior. He's not superman or even super-lawyer. But keep wishing. Your wish could come true.

But do realize, it's just a wish.

local lib wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Could Kanye be the author of the modern day "At long last have you no shame" moment for fascist liberalism? He might have the cultural clout to pull it off.

Kanye is welcome to support the President. It isn’t the first or last time that he and I have disagreed.

Shows how out of touch Gary is, at least when it comes to hip hop. Cultural clout??? hahaha. Kanye has made his career by being controversial. Take a look at all the diarrhea that has come out of his mouth over the last 20 years and his behavior in general, you will hardly find anything sensible. His fans like his bravado and "I don't care" attitude, but few take his views seriously. After all, he's just a spoiled rich guy with a big ego - no don't even begin to suggest he would actually speak for minorities. He gets off on being annoying and going against the grain. See his latest song, he's battling T.I. on politics... it's just part of his business model.

You know trumpers are desperate when they refer to Kanye.

Kanye has become the Trump of "rap", more posture than substance. And he's become super boring as an artist

Thanks Donny, the DOW is still at NOV 2017 levels. You lied to me and told me the market would be "on fire"

Guiliani obviously leaked the Mueller questions. On another note, why do Republicans hate Democracy so much? Missouri Republicans moving a union destruction ballot proposal from the November mid-terms to August primaries, in hopes that lower turnout will improve its chances of passing. They still have a rapist for a governor, btw. http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/plan-to-move-missouri-s-right-to-work-vote-to/article_f6b3e253-6c91-5b9b-baf4-5e8a3eb7d61c.html

Trollminator wrote:

You know trumpers are desperate when they refer to Kanye.

They are OBSESSED with this story. They pretend to hate Hollywood and the "cultural elite", but they really can't get enough of them. I think there's a great deal of overlap between Trump voters and people who buy the celebrity gossip magazines at the grocery store. Dude had a psychotic break just a year ago. He's not exactly a paradigm of good mental health. (Probably another reason Trumpers suddenly find him so interesting.)

Trollminator wrote:

Trump Tax Cuts EPIC Fail wrote:

Rubio throws Trump and pals under the bus.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/04/30/marco-rubio-just-went-way-off-message-on-the-gop-tax-cuts/

Trickle down was always a sham, nothing new here, it’s just Rubio trying to have a unique perspective.

How about the angry blue waves about to exit NY and CA due to the disproportionate shafting they are receiving from the tax reform. This will ensure more Democrats get elected in those states these folks will call home.

I do not believe that there will be any "angry blue waves" exiting NY or CA due to recent changes in tax laws. Perhaps a handful. Nothing to make any difference in any election calculus.

Kanye is making the case for basic freedoms like free speech and the right to independent thought better than just about anyone else out there. He is pushing back against Liberal group think fascism and he is doing it the right way.

Of course tomorrow he may change his tune, but today he's doing it right.

... and those questions are nothing but a perjury trap. Asking him about his "motives"? Who gives a damn about his motives when it comes to upholding the law. This is tabloid justice. We are becoming a banana republic and Trump isn't causing it.

Trump shouldn't talk to Mueller.

DiscoGary wrote:

... and those questions are nothing but a perjury trap. Asking him about his "motives"? Who gives a damn about his motives when it comes to upholding the law. This is tabloid justice. We are becoming a banana republic and Trump isn't causing it.

Trump shouldn't talk to Mueller.

Those questions are not normal legal questions. They were written by Team Trump in a manner that Trump might understand them, and questions about collusion were not allowed. They were handed to Team Mueller for review. Then they were leaked by Team Trump to the Failing New York Times. Yup . . . it was a weak trap set at the demand of the Orange Clown in the White House.

1) Zero change? We have even more evidence of collusion that is known to the public. Michael Cohen has been raided. Trump is trying to distance himself from Cohen, and he just admitted in an unhinged "interview" that Cohen is and has been representing him in the Stormy Daniels case. What are you even talking about?

2) Giuliani isn't bringing an end to anything.

3) I can not be incorrect as you say. I have predicted what will happen when the investigation is over, and it is not yet over. It's like if I said the sun will come up tomorrow, am I wrong until it does? No. I am only wrong if it doesn't.

4) I'll make another prediction -- when the investigation is over and I am proven correct that Donald Trump is the most corrupt President BY FAR that we have ever had and he is removed from office or resigns, we will never see you post under this name again.

5) As I've said before, I don't need to cross my fingers. My prediction isn't based on hope and wishes. Methinks YOU are the one crossing your fingers, because your prediction isn't based in reality.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

1) Trump will be impeached AND convicted, OR he will resign.

2) IF for some reason it doesn't happen, I will NOT make any excuses, for I NEVER do that. I realize that Republicans might decide to protect their own and that Trump could skate, but I will not use that as an excuse. The reason is that I have integrity.

3) The truth that comes out will be so bad that even Trump-supporting Republicans will have to vote to remove.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

DiscoGary wrote:

Kanye is making the case for basic freedoms like free speech and the right to independent thought better than just about anyone else out there. He is pushing back against Liberal group think fascism and he is doing it the right way.

Of course tomorrow he may change his tune, but today he's doing it right.

Is he really "making the case"? How so?