Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sorry pal, watch this video. It's quite a hoot!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QjCF3Q3CFc

don't bother leftist goofballs, you only believe what you want to believe.

Trollminator wrote:

Racket wrote:

What if it is determined unequivocally that whatever leverage or assistance Russia had did not alter the outcome of the 2016 election?

It’s not possible to find conclusive evidence their actions DID NOT alter the elections. Trump hates it more than anything because deep down he knows his “win” was assisted.

Is there any reason to think that foreign governments have not meddled in prior elections? I imagine that in the digital age it has become easier to spread propaganda and there it's probably easier to influence the way that some people vote. That being said I think the real question is "did the Trump campaign embrace this foreign interference?" And yes I agree that Trump hates the fact that he can't take all the credit for his win.

Count Chocula wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

It’s not possible to find conclusive evidence their actions DID NOT alter the elections. Trump hates it more than anything because deep down he knows his “win” was assisted.

Is there any reason to think that foreign governments have not meddled in prior elections? I imagine that in the digital age it has become easier to spread propaganda and there it's probably easier to influence the way that some people vote. That being said I think the real question is "did the Trump campaign embrace this foreign interference?" And yes I agree that Trump hates the fact that he can't take all the credit for his win.

Yes, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama won due to foreign interference.

Donald Trump didn't have any interference. To believe that shows your ignorance at a level beyond belief.

Count Chocula wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

It’s not possible to find conclusive evidence their actions DID NOT alter the elections. Trump hates it more than anything because deep down he knows his “win” was assisted.

Is there any reason to think that foreign governments have not meddled in prior elections? I imagine that in the digital age it has become easier to spread propaganda and there it's probably easier to influence the way that some people vote. That being said I think the real question is "did the Trump campaign embrace this foreign interference?" And yes I agree that Trump hates the fact that he can't take all the credit for his win.

Yes, personally, I believe that Hillary Clinton spread propaganda that influenced "your vote" since you were an uninformed and impressionable voter. Obviously you like crooks and didn't do your homework.

Trump's swamp continues to expose itself.

Mick Mulvaney, Trump's head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, told banking executives that as a congressman, he only met with lobbyists who gave money.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2018/04/25/daily-202-mick-mulvaney-s-confession-highlights-the-corrosive-influence-of-money-in-politics/5adfea2230fb043711926869/

Boo Berry wrote:

Yes, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama won due to foreign interference.

Donald Trump didn't have any interference. To believe that shows your ignorance at a level beyond belief.

Do you have a blog? Maybe a myspace page with your deep thoughts elucidated?

You need to explain these conspiracy theories.

Trump's Swamp wrote:

Trump's swamp continues to expose itself.

Mick Mulvaney, Trump's head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, told banking executives that as a congressman, he only met with lobbyists who gave money.

What happened Conservative Justice Warriors?!!?

Where's the swamp draining? Forgotten voters forgotten.

I want to believe!! Help me!!

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

No one can say that either one way or the other, so the test has to be whether there was coordinated cheating...and again, I set this as a criteria for me being right about the 2016 election before the election.

I'm only going to track and hold you responsible for your claims of Mueller coming and the clown being done. There are too many variables for the 2016 election, your criteria doesn't seem as well defined, and it's close to two years in the past now.

I would caution you in general though in giving credit to the Russians for the election outcome if collusion is found. The American public, not Russia, proved themselves to be capable of a hatred and stupidity that most thought impossible. Americans we're primed and gullible enough to believe any stupid fake news their racist aunt shared on Facebook.

I have never said Trump won because of Russia. I have only said that if cheating is discovered, then he can not really be the winner, because cheaters can not win. It is IMPOSSIBLE to know if the Russian interference was enough to change what could have been a victory for HRC to a win for DJT, so debating that is useless. In the Olympics, when someone is found to have cheated, there is never a discussion of whether said cheating was for sure the thing that enabled them to win...they are simply stripped of their medal. Same is true here, and that was my example the whole time.

I will say though that it is LIKELY (though again, no one can say for sure one way or the other) that the Russian interference, including fake ads and memes and fake gatherings and the drip drip drip of stolen e-mails had an effect. We don't spend money on advertising because it DOESN'T work. People in this thread are still spewing incorrect information that was planted by Russians. The effort of the Russians did many things...suppressed the vote for Democrats, caused big rift between Bernie and Hillary supporters, riled up voters to vote for Trump who didn't normally vote. Now, the Democrats were responsible for a lot of that too, and even though she wasn't as flawed as Trumpers and Russians painted her, Hillary was a flawed candidate, but we have laws in place to protect our elections that include no help from a foreign power.

So, just to be clear, I understand that you will not be judging that part now, but IF conspiracy (or bribery) with Russia is proven, then I will be right about the 2016 election, for cheaters can not be winners.

Pope T-Bag II wrote:

Every morning I wake up, I hope that the President of the United States of America has been assassinated. And that we're finally rounding up all of his voters to be hauled off to death camps. This would include my own mother. Every morning I'm disappointed.

Trump will assassinate himself. Two Big Macs or two Filet-o-fish, two large fries, a large chocolate cake, and a couple of diet cokes. And that's just for lunch. Add his sedentary life style - he rides a cart everywhere - and a massive coronary is right around the corner for Trump.

McDonalds Heart-Attack, Trump wrote:

Trump will assassinate himself. Two Big Macs or two Filet-o-fish, two large fries, a large chocolate cake, and a couple of diet cokes. And that's just for lunch. Add his sedentary life style - he rides a cart everywhere - and a massive coronary is right around the corner for Trump.

But, but, the Dear Leader is in the best shape! A doctor said so. It must be true. No one is in better shape!

Crooked Hilllllary wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:

Is there any reason to think that foreign governments have not meddled in prior elections? I imagine that in the digital age it has become easier to spread propaganda and there it's probably easier to influence the way that some people vote. That being said I think the real question is "did the Trump campaign embrace this foreign interference?" And yes I agree that Trump hates the fact that he can't take all the credit for his win.

Yes, personally, I believe that Hillary Clinton spread propaganda that influenced "your vote" since you were an uninformed and impressionable voter. Obviously you like crooks and didn't do your homework.

Propaganda is like germs, you will not be able to avoid it, you must be strong to avoid getting disease. In this case the strength is education and awareness. Unfortunately many people will remain susceptible. (aka Trumpers)

You were correct after all, my brother. You were correct...

http://thebluewavecommunity.com/trump-got-this-one-right-the-2016-election-was-rigged-trump-campaign-staffer-convicted-on-ten-counts-of-major-election-fraud/

Count Chocula wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

It’s not possible to find conclusive evidence their actions DID NOT alter the elections. Trump hates it more than anything because deep down he knows his “win” was assisted.

Is there any reason to think that foreign governments have not meddled in prior elections? I imagine that in the digital age it has become easier to spread propaganda and there it's probably easier to influence the way that some people vote. That being said I think the real question is "did the Trump campaign embrace this foreign interference?" And yes I agree that Trump hates the fact that he can't take all the credit for his win.

I don’t think a foreign government has tried to meddle in our elections this directly. Anything could be construed as meddling, such as a significant election contribution sourced from a foreign power, or even a close friendship between a candidate and a foreign leader. However, never before has a foreign intelligence arm hacked into party servers and stolen contents with the aim of disseminating to smear politicians and trigger discord within a country, specially during an election. The social media farming activities have had a smaller impact I believe, as people tend to follow their biases and find “news” that fits their preconceived notions. But that is also quite new and direct. There was also the attempted hacking of the voting machines across all states. It’s not the meddling that is surprising, it’s that it was so direct and intentional. How can we not consider that an immediate threat our democracy?

Rigged for Hilllary wrote:

You were correct after all, my brother. You were correct...

http://thebluewavecommunity.com/trump-got-this-one-right-the-2016-election-was-rigged-trump-campaign-staffer-convicted-on-ten-counts-of-major-election-fraud/

Even though you aren't the real Rigged for Hillary, you are nonetheless correct that I was correct. It is extremely rare that I am not correct.

That said, I won't take any victory laps based on something posted in the "bluewavecommunity".

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole wrote:

[quote]Rigged for Hilllary wrote:

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

MOM, LOOK, I TYPED IT AGAIN!

It IS of course a threat to our democracy as you surmise, and Trump is involved.

liberals are lazy [JAMIN] wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

[quote]Rigged for Hilllary wrote:

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

MOM, LOOK, I TYPED IT AGAIN!

OH MOMMY, I AM SORRY THAT I AM SCREAMING, AGAIN!

-- JAMIN

XY wrote:

Market down again. Thanks Donny!

A little piece of advice, never proclaim a market result until 4PM ET because you come off as a moran. Right now, all the indices are green with a little more than 30 mins to go.

Are you too stupid to understand that a Christian would vote for and support Trump because of their greater fear that the Liberals would not support their religious minded beliefs? They don't need anyone in the White House who acts like a Christian, they need someone in there who's on their side which he is.