DFF you need to read this post. It will be difficult for you but important for you.I dare you to tell me anything I posted is wrong.I know you won't be able to read it and respond to it. You just can't.
DFF you need to read this post. It will be difficult for you but important for you.I dare you to tell me anything I posted is wrong.I know you won't be able to read it and respond to it. You just can't.
I previously left out the most important analytical evidence as it deserves its own post. DFF has increasingly made references to suicide. Since we know he's projecting, this could only mean one thing. Hope LRC is ok with watching this depressed individual spiral out of control.
Psychologist wrote:
Do you know weakness wrote:DFF you need to read this post. It will be difficult for you but important for you.
I dare you to tell me anything I posted is wrong.
I know you won't be able to read it and respond to it. You just can't.
I previously left out the most important analytical evidence as it deserves its own post. DFF has increasingly made references to suicide. Since we know he's projecting, this could only mean one thing. Hope LRC is ok with watching this depressed individual spiral out of control.
Right out of the DFF play book...
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-39194035Get help before it's too late
>50% of all the posts on this thread are from one handle = deranged. Have a depressing night watch 😘
the selection of deleted posts in this thread says it all
you point out some truth and it's gone
say outrageous stuff that at any reasonable site would be removed and the poster banned...but here it stays
it's a shame
know your weakness wrote:
Many people dismiss DFF as just a jerk troll. I don't. I believe there is a story behind DFF and its not a good one.
No one posts on this site more than DFF. He posts constantly and at different times of day. He can't be employed.
[/quote]
Just for the record, and I too think DFF may be going overboard at times, but Agip has posted on this thread more than anyone. Under multiple names (eric blair, etc.) now, of course. But leading up to the election he was full-bore spouting recited garbage about 20 times a day. It was out of control. Link tothis, link to that. All of it from biased sources. None of it including any original thought of his own. Then he took a break to recuperate from his utter devastation.....then changed his name to reincarnate himself....and then BOOM, we all get eric blair.
qun a su wrote:
the selection of deleted posts in this thread says it all
you point out some truth and it's gone
say outrageous stuff that at any reasonable site would be removed and the poster banned...but here it stays
it's a shame
My initial thought was that the Brojos generally don't want the pollution that comes with political threads so they just allowed everyone to roam free on this single one. However, as you point out there is a strange selection process for deleting posts. In addition, DFF's nonsense is scattered all over the boards, and no matter how offensive his posts are they never get deleted. The only conclusion is that he's protected.
ForTheRecord wrote:
know your weakness wrote:Many people dismiss DFF as just a jerk troll. I don't. I believe there is a story behind DFF and its not a good one.
No one posts on this site more than DFF. He posts constantly and at different times of day. He can't be employed.
Just for the record, and I too think DFF may be going overboard at times, but Agip has posted on this thread more than anyone. Under multiple names (eric blair, etc.) now, of course. But leading up to the election he was full-bore spouting recited garbage about 20 times a day. It was out of control. Link tothis, link to that. All of it from biased sources. None of it including any original thought of his own. Then he took a break to recuperate from his utter devastation.....then changed his name to reincarnate himself....and then BOOM, we all get eric blair.[/quote]
I don't think any of that comes close to what we've seen from DFF in recent months though.
THE guy that is the face of the "Russia collusion" narrative finally just said there's no definitive proof. FINALLY. We've been asking for months now to simply state what the accusation even is. Months. And nothing. Never a clear statement of what the heck we're even talking about. And millions of lemmings fall in line for their tribe. But still, nothing. Nada. Zero.
Just keep crossing your fingers, Adam!! Something might pop up! Hahahaha
Hey, DFF, did you ever see GG Allin perform live?
Going to screen save some of these posts for the record.
And there is no definitive proof that OJ killed anyone.
ForTheRecord wrote:
Just for the record, and I too think DFF may be going overboard at times, but Agip has posted on this thread more than anyone. Under multiple names (eric blair, etc.) now, of course. But leading up to the election he was full-bore spouting recited garbage about 20 times a day. It was out of control. Link tothis, link to that. All of it from biased sources. None of it including any original thought of his own. Then he took a break to recuperate from his utter devastation.....then changed his name to reincarnate himself....and then BOOM, we all get eric blair.
Lol. You seriously can't tell the difference between an enthusiastic liberal poster and a guy who does nothing but rub shit in his hair and insert a few libbbtards and emojis? Gotta be Itsbaddude.
* wrote:
And there is no definitive proof that OJ killed anyone.
The obvious difference being that someone could at least describe the accusation in the OJ case. Fairly straightforward. And the evidence was certainly there.
In this case, not a single Democrat has been able to even state the accusation against Donald Trump. They've been pressed on primetime national television time and time again, and the answer is always.... wait for it.... wait for it....
"We need an investigation [to find out what we want to accuse him of]."
Loving it so much wrote:
* wrote:And there is no definitive proof that OJ killed anyone.
The obvious difference being that someone could at least describe the accusation in the OJ case. Fairly straightforward. And the evidence was certainly there.
In this case, not a single Democrat has been able to even state the accusation against Donald Trump. They've been pressed on primetime national television time and time again, and the answer is always.... wait for it.... wait for it....
"We need an investigation [to find out what we want to accuse him of]."
That's standard procedure. Sometimes, investigations take years to complete. Every case is different.
I'm glad they are being careful and taking their time. If Trump is innocent then it's best make sure of that and then drop the matter altogether. If Trump is guilty then it's best to make sure of that too, before proceeding to the next step.
Don't you agree?
This DFF guy makes the thread unreadable and no one is going to accuse me of being a liberal.
Here's an accurate Trump-era headline. The piece points out that the Trump agenda is pretty much loathed by all, D and R. But the headline is better than the story:
Reg Fields wrote:
This DFF guy makes the thread unreadable and no one is going to accuse me of being a liberal.
I tried to get people to stop reading and responding to DFF but some poster decided to engage with him with mockery.
It didn't work of course and now DFF is encouraged by believing people read his posts.
He will go away, people, if we stop reading and responding to him. Simple as that.
Fat hurts wrote:
Loving it so much wrote:The obvious difference being that someone could at least describe the accusation in the OJ case. Fairly straightforward. And the evidence was certainly there.
In this case, not a single Democrat has been able to even state the accusation against Donald Trump. They've been pressed on primetime national television time and time again, and the answer is always.... wait for it.... wait for it....
"We need an investigation [to find out what we want to accuse him of]."
That's standard procedure. Sometimes, investigations take years to complete. Every case is different.
I'm glad they are being careful and taking their time. If Trump is innocent then it's best make sure of that and then drop the matter altogether. If Trump is guilty then it's best to make sure of that too, before proceeding to the next step.
Don't you agree?
No surprise, but you're missing the point. They can't even name the accusation against Trump. So we don't even know what we're supposedly looking into here. It might as well be called investigation "Russia and stuff."
Why was there an investigation into OJ? Because two people were found dead on his property.
Why are they TRYING to get an investigation into Russia interfering in the election? Because HRC lost an election that had been planned for 20 years, by betting heavily on identity politics as the core strategy (literally nothing else was even on the table). The establishment political-media was absolutely DEVASTATED by the outcome.
Serious questions- Total hypothetical situation- If China hacks a given US president's emails in year 2 of a presidency, which exposes scandalous/illegal activity, which is never disputed by president, as he basically acknowledges that it was true, and it becomes what he is known for, and he loses the next election...
Would the media consider it "meddling in US elections"? Does it have to be an election year to constitute meddling in elections? At what point is the blame actually on the candidate/party for simply being slithering pieces of garbage?
Should the voters care how the information came about? Is the truth less valuable because of the source?
yes, literally NOTHING else was on the table.
HRC campaigned on NOTHING but ID politics. I mean I agree that the Dems way overplay the ID politics but you are undermining your argument if you ignore her wonkiness.