Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
Guys, guys. Some of you need to get out and GO FOR A RUN.
The best post I've seen here in while.
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
Guys, guys. Some of you need to get out and GO FOR A RUN.
The best post I've seen here in while.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Here we go. The LR lib echo chamber keeps tilting further to the left. They’re going to make 2020 so easy for Donald Trump.
Free college
High taxes
No voter ID
Open borders
Get rid of ICE
Take the guns
Unlimited welfare
Single-payer healthcare
Just see how much the American people will embrace that garbage.
Flagpole is the clown and Mueller is done.
They're also going to have to come up with some reasoning how the decimation of ISIS that occurred under Trump was actually not because of Trump, and how the dramatic decrease in border crossings and arrests was not because of Trump.
Can't wait til Jorge Ramos is back in the spotlight for the Dems!! Ha ha
Soon conservatives will be telling us that anyone who doesn't want to emulate totalitarian countries and execute drug dealers is soft on crime. Whom else should we start considering eligible for the death penalty? Doctors who overprescribe opioids? Cigarette retailers? Disseminators of socialist/anti-Trump propaganda? I'm so excited by our President's bold new ideas, I can hardly contain my bloodlust!
nontrumper wrote:
Boulder, Colorada wrote:
The California thing is not an argument, it's a fact. Do you understand basic math? Donald Trump wins the popular vote without the heavily biased liberal state of California. Comparing that to elections of the past doesn't fly as you aren't comparing apples to apples. Do try to keep up.
It's a nonsensical argument. Speaking of basic math, the popular vote is based on who gets the most votes and everyone's vote counts the same. It doesn't matter where you live. A vote in CA = vote in WY = a vote in NY = a vote in TX = a vote in MI. I can keep going if you're still confused? Taking California out of the picture is a simpleton's argument. Votes in a heavily biased liberal state count as much as votes in a heavily biased conservative state. Got it?
Let's move forward. Trump is president. He won by having more electoral votes. Hillary won the popular vote. Those are facts. Simple ones. Unfortunately, the obsession of Hillary winning the popular vote won't end any time soon.
One more thing in case there is still confusion among Trumpers... Trump's removal from office won't make Hillary president. Or Obama. Let it go, man. Let it go.
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
*********
Hillary Clinton lost by the system that Democrats love, except for when they lose. Hurts doesn't it? Get over it, your opinion is worthless, try going out for a run in your local 5k, you may just place in your age group.
L L wrote:
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
Guys, guys. Some of you need to get out and GO FOR A RUN.
The best post I've seen here in while.
You must live a very sheltered life is that's the best you've seen. I bet you don't even run.
Moonbeam Brown wrote:
The idea here is for Jerry Brown’s crony developer friends to build cities along the rail lines. Grease each others’ palms, bring in more illegal voters, abdicate responsibilities of maintaining existing infrastructure (crumbling highways, etc.). Plus the state could have had de-salinization plants up and down the coast by now, making CA drought-free. . .
Earth to Moonbeam: This thread is about Trump.
Afraid to talk about Trump? Maybe you should start your own safe space thread.
Earth to Moonbeam wrote:
Moonbeam Brown wrote:
The idea here is for Jerry Brown’s crony developer friends to build cities along the rail lines. Grease each others’ palms, bring in more illegal voters, abdicate responsibilities of maintaining existing infrastructure (crumbling highways, etc.). Plus the state could have had de-salinization plants up and down the coast by now, making CA drought-free. . .
Earth to Moonbeam: This thread is about Trump.
Afraid to talk about Trump? Maybe you should start your own safe space thread.
No, it's about the election. You guys complain about the silliest stuff and think people won't bring up Obama or Clinton (HYPROCRITES), dream on old man. If you guys had had a better candidate, I might have voted for him/her. To vote the wife into office of corrupt Bill, are you kidding? Maybe you should pull up your big boy pants and grow a pair. Until then, deal with it or don't post.
Piedpiper22 wrote:
nontrumper wrote:
It's a nonsensical argument. Speaking of basic math, the popular vote is based on who gets the most votes and everyone's vote counts the same. It doesn't matter where you live. A vote in CA = vote in WY = a vote in NY = a vote in TX = a vote in MI. I can keep going if you're still confused? Taking California out of the picture is a simpleton's argument. Votes in a heavily biased liberal state count as much as votes in a heavily biased conservative state. Got it?
Let's move forward. Trump is president. He won by having more electoral votes. Hillary won the popular vote. Those are facts. Simple ones. Unfortunately, the obsession of Hillary winning the popular vote won't end any time soon.
One more thing in case there is still confusion among Trumpers... Trump's removal from office won't make Hillary president. Or Obama. Let it go, man. Let it go.
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
*********
Hillary Clinton lost by the system that Democrats love, except for when they lose. Hurts doesn't it? Get over it, your opinion is worthless, try going out for a run in your local 5k, you may just place in your age group.
You used logic. Liberals don't like logic. They deflect and deny, never admitting wrong. But, nice try.
leimee wrote:
Like I've said multiple times, there will be absolutely no evidence of "collusion" that emerges from this investigation. Check out what has already been said today by Comey corroborating Clapper. The NSA and FBI have told Congress that there is no Russian influence. The Russian ruse was designed by aggrieved Democrats, liberals and anti-trumpers (left and right) entrenched in the establishment. It is an attempt to convince "an unaware and compliant citizenry" that the only way Hillary lost was because Russia changed the election. The media is essentially an establishment propaganda arm, a way to push cooked polls and misrepresent reality. The same media that told us not to bother to vote for Trump because Hillary had a 97% chance of victory and a near-guaranteed win of 323 electoral votes. The establishment is losing badly, but because Trump represents an existential threat, they will fight with their last dying breath. They will not give up, and in fact their hysterical spin will only intensify. At this point, if you are a self-respecting citizen and you still believe that Russia and the Trump campaign colluded, you are a fool and a partisan hack.
The above post was from 1 year ago today.
That was back when the "collluuuussssion" narrative was being pushed by the media, and subsequently, their sheep.
Whoever this dude is, nailed it. Every sentence has been or is being carried out to a T. Well done, sir.
Barney Flintstone wrote:
Piedpiper22 wrote:
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
*********
Hillary Clinton lost by the system that Democrats love, except for when they lose. Hurts doesn't it? Get over it, your opinion is worthless, try going out for a run in your local 5k, you may just place in your age group.
You used logic. Liberals don't like logic. They deflect and deny, never admitting wrong. But, nice try.
You're shouting loudly into a retard echo chamber but logic is not one of the things contained in your statement.
Barney Flintstone wrote:
Piedpiper22 wrote:
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
*********
Hillary Clinton lost by the system that Democrats love, except for when they lose. Hurts doesn't it? Get over it, your opinion is worthless, try going out for a run in your local 5k, you may just place in your age group.
You used logic. Liberals don't like logic. They deflect and deny, never admitting wrong. But, nice try.
Ah yes, but what you won't acknowledge is that if you remove Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas, Kansas, Nebraska, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Indiana from the vote totals, then Hillary Clinton would win the electoral college as well as the popular vote!
Some states are more influential than others because they have a bigger population/economy. The opinions of one state shouldn't decide what happens in the rest of the states. But the omission of a state's votes in order to prove a particular point is short-sighted. Even if every non-Californian voted for Trump, that wouldn't make California's votes any less meaningful.
Even I can admit that California is vital to the USA. We would literally go under if California's economy wasn't counted. So we have to count their votes if we count their economy.
Rigged for Hilllary wrote:
Even I can admit that California is vital to the USA. We would literally go under if California's economy wasn't counted. So we have to count their votes if we count their economy.
+1
DlscoGary wrote:
Rigged for Hilllary wrote:
Even I can admit that California is vital to the USA. We would literally go under if California's economy wasn't counted. So we have to count their votes if we count their economy.
+1
+2
jamiin wrote:
DlscoGary wrote:
+1
+2
+3
Piedpiper22 wrote:
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
Fortunately, much smarter than you based on your post. A vote is a vote. I can't simplify it any further. More people in the US voted for Clinton than Trump. It doesn't matter the state by state breakdown. Hillary. Had. More. Votes. But, Trump won the presidency. I moved on months ago.
I think Trumpers need to start focus on the here and now. And it's not looking very good. We will learn in the coming weeks that the Cambridge Analytica story is huge. It's not news to Mueller, but it's unraveling before our eyes.
nontrumper wrote:
Piedpiper22 wrote:
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
Fortunately, much smarter than you based on your post. A vote is a vote. I can't simplify it any further. More people in the US voted for Clinton than Trump. It doesn't matter the state by state breakdown. Hillary. Had. More. Votes. But, Trump won the presidency. I moved on months ago.
I think Trumpers need to start focus on the here and now. And it's not looking very good. We will learn in the coming weeks that the Cambridge Analytica story is huge. It's not news to Mueller, but it's unraveling before our eyes.
Ha! Oh yes- now it's the Cambridge story! That'll bring Trump down!
You guys crack me up.
Just. Wow. wrote:
now it's the Cambridge story! That'll bring Trump down!
Indeed.
British Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said Monday that she was requesting a warrant to access Cambridge Analytica’s servers after the firm didn’t cooperate with an investigation into whether it illegally acquired and used Facebook users’ data.
And, Facebook "security auditors" got to "see" Cambridge Analytica’s servers before the authorities could.
Facebook = Faceplant
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/uk-official-seek-access-cambridge-analyticas-servers-53861395https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/20/ftc-opens-investigation-into-facebook-after-cambridge-analytica-scrapes-millions-of-users-personal-information/Wow. Just. wrote:
Just. Wow. wrote:
now it's the Cambridge story! That'll bring Trump down!
Indeed.
British Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said Monday that she was requesting a warrant to access Cambridge Analytica’s servers after the firm didn’t cooperate with an investigation into whether it illegally acquired and used Facebook users’ data.
And, Facebook "security auditors" got to "see" Cambridge Analytica’s servers before the authorities could.
Facebook = Faceplant
nontrumper wrote:
Piedpiper22 wrote:
You aren't very bright nontrumper and someone definitely hit a nerve with you.
Read the following and learn something. Comparing the Presidential election results to a sporting event is lower than ignorance.
*************
CLAIM
Hillary Clinton's popular vote win in the presidential election came entirely from the state of California.
RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
On 18 December 2016, the Federalist Papers, a conservative clickbait web site, posted a story headlined “Hillary’s Popular Vote Win Came ENTIRELY from California”:
If the election was decided by the popular vote, than we would be swearing in a President Hillary Clinton.
But that’s not how it works. And — as he has said many time — if Donald Trump was campaigning for the popular vote, rather than the electoral vote, he would have campaigned much differently.
But he didn’t and Hillary’s margin of victory in that state was 4.3 million votes — or 61.5 percent
And therein lies the rub.
The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections…
If you take California out of the total, Donald Trump won the popular vote by 1.4 million.
As the web site pointed out, as of 19 December 2016 CNN had Hillary Clinton winning a popular vote margin over Donald Trump with totals of 65,788,583 to 62,955,363 respectively, a margin of approximately 2.8 million votes (although Trump won the presidency by securing 306 electoral college votes, 36 more than he needed to claim victory).
Fortunately, much smarter than you based on your post. A vote is a vote. I can't simplify it any further. More people in the US voted for Clinton than Trump. It doesn't matter the state by state breakdown. Hillary. Had. More. Votes. But, Trump won the presidency. I moved on months ago.
I think Trumpers need to start focus on the here and now. And it's not looking very good. We will learn in the coming weeks that the Cambridge Analytica story is huge. It's not news to Mueller, but it's unraveling before our eyes.
she won the popular vote by 2.1%, that's called a sneeze in the world of stats. if trump had won the popular vote by the same about in the same manner, I'd be man enough to admit the facts.
Des Linden: "The entire sport" has changed since she first started running Boston.
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Ryan Eiler, 3rd American man at Boston, almost out of nowhere
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion