Oddball wrote:
Brad Pitt being single is bad news for all of us
Yeah that will make a big difference!
Oddball wrote:
Brad Pitt being single is bad news for all of us
Yeah that will make a big difference!
+1
Wowzers wrote:
lipstick on a pig wrote:This would be a real good time for Hillary to have another fainting spell or email scandal since the media's attention will be distracted by the unfolding Brangelina drama!
Wow, 4th post and you've already made the jump from Angelina Jolie to Hillary Clinton. Must be torture to be trapped in such a limited mind.
soo what wrote:
She wants to save the world
He wants to chill an fire up a serious spliff
The rest of us continue on our merry way
It's all about the CHILDREN. There's a little United Nations of kids to divvy up here. How much ya wanna bet they're gonna be as screwed up as Michael Jacksons "children?"
Wait did anyone check if her latest acquired African child was not in fact named Divorce already?
ZZZ. Same old... No surprise here. A hollywood divorce? Unprecedented...
Jolie has been married what, three times now?
Serial monogamy is so 2009.
once, twice, three times wrote:
Jolie has been married what, three times now?
God Hillary is such a bitch
I think they will be better off than if they weren't adopted.Don't take a good and noble thing and make it bad...
Deebo wrote:
soo what wrote:She wants to save the world
He wants to chill an fire up a serious spliff
The rest of us continue on our merry way
It's all about the CHILDREN. There's a little United Nations of kids to divvy up here. How much ya wanna bet they're gonna be as screwed up as Michael Jacksons "children?"
Reality Bath wrote:
Serial monogamy is so 2009.
once, twice, three times wrote:Jolie has been married what, three times now?
Marriage, divorce, marriage, divorce. That is literally serial monogamy.
Another Hollywood marriage fails. Who cares and how is this news? It has been all over supposedly serious news sites in the last day.
What are those two gonna do with all those PC children they collected. How so brave and compassionate of them.
Duhthef***duh wrote:
What are those two gonna do with all those PC children they collected. How so brave and compassionate of them.
Fight over them.
lipstick on a pig wrote:
Wowzers wrote:Lol, must be torture being a thin-skinned Hillary supporter who lets himself get flushed out so easily by "such a limited mind"!Wow, 4th post and you've already made the jump from Angelina Jolie to Hillary Clinton. Must be torture to be trapped in such a limited mind.
LOL So you admit that your life is pure hell.
Sorry.
fancy bear with cinnamon wrote:
Reality Bath wrote:Serial monogamy is so 2009.
Marriage, divorce, marriage, divorce. That is literally serial monogamy.
Not really.
That would be true IF they were monogamous during the marriage bits. That's a HUGE assumption.
DoritosLocosTacos wrote:
+1
Wowzers wrote:Wow, 4th post and you've already made the jump from Angelina Jolie to Hillary Clinton. Must be torture to be trapped in such a limited mind.
Wowzers nailed him.
If you deduced that from my post your parents need to sue your teachers for educational malpractice!Wowzers wrote:
lipstick on a pig wrote:Lol, must be torture being a thin-skinned Hillary supporter who lets himself get flushed out so easily by "such a limited mind"!LOL So you admit that your life is pure hell.
Sorry.
he is a fraud wrote:
Wowzers nailed him.
Child, if that's what you consider nailing someone, God help you, when you enter real life!
Saddest day for Brad since Ricky Schroeder beat him in the 800.
How ironic that Jennifer Aniston is all over TV plugging a product for "artificial tears."
Serial Pseudo-monogamy is so 2012.
Not Really Man wrote:
fancy bear with cinnamon wrote:Marriage, divorce, marriage, divorce. That is literally serial monogamy.
Not really.
That would be true IF they were monogamous during the marriage bits. That's a HUGE assumption.