Now that the british have control of anti-doping and the IAAF is he fully protected?
Now that the british have control of anti-doping and the IAAF is he fully protected?
He is Lance v2.
Will this board ever get shut down or will it just carry on like this forever?
How is it immune?
This board is an inanimate object. It is not fueled by human PEDs.
trackfan. wrote:
Now that the british have control of anti-doping and the IAAF is he fully protected?
And what makes you think that there is anything he is getting away with?
Who
What makes you think there is not?
Get caught at what? Down the final straight away in a race? NO CHANCE!
I think he will get caught, however at that point it will be too late and hardly anyone will care.
You mean like no one cared about Lance being caught?
Will Kare wrote:
You mean like no one cared about Lance being caught?
No, Lance is 8 trillion times the celebrity that Mo Farah is.
Ohro. wrote:
What makes you think there is not?
What makes you think that it works that way round?
Will Kare wrote:
You mean like no one cared about Lance being caught?
They would not have cared if he was caught 20 years from now.
Roho wrote:
Will Kare wrote:You mean like no one cared about Lance being caught?
They would not have cared if he was caught 20 years from now.
That too.
Roho wrote:
Ohro. wrote:What makes you think there is not?
What makes you think that it works that way round?
If it doesn't work the other way around then the original question doesn't work. Basic principal of logic.
What is he supposed to be taking?
He did make all his blood data public so is the suggestion that it is some super-secret drug that is not currently tested for ?
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
What is he supposed to be taking?
He did make all his blood data public so is the suggestion that it is some super-secret drug that is not currently tested for ?
Lance's blood data showed no anomalies.
BTW, Farah did not release all his blood data. None of the self-tests were provided. I'm not sure he provided anything that proved he provided data for every required test he had done. When he provided his data it was likely all he had, or only what is agent and managers wanted to provide.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
What is he supposed to be taking?
He did make all his blood data public so is the suggestion that it is some super-secret drug that is not currently tested for ?
He only published 20 off scores from 2005 - 2012, a far cry from "all his blood data". That only shows that his Hct never went above 50% or so, not that he didn't use EPO or blood transfusions or HGH etc.
There seems to be confusion about a key part of logic here, the onus of proof lies with those making an accusation for the well established reason that it is not possible to prove a negative. My question was already asked which is - is he doping with substances that can be detected currently or with some new wonder drug that only he knows about?
trackfan. wrote:
Now that the british have control of anti-doping and the IAAF is he fully protected?
My guess: No. They'll be a few more pieces of circumstantial evidence that he can just lie away, but he'll never go down.
Des Linden: "The entire sport" has changed since she first started running Boston.
Ryan Eiler, 3rd American man at Boston, almost out of nowhere
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion