Dr. R wrote:
Like I said before, if you think that I'm pushing some kind of agenda here, the same could be said about Rojo, given his sources and myopia regarding the complexity of the issue. And you might know, but others do not-- I'm responding to what I see as incorrect assertions based on the evidence out there. Also, as someone else stated, XY isn't 100% in cases like this there is the small possibility of CAH, and there could be other factors as well.
Often people want to get personal when they've exhausted their argument, and that's fine, I'm used to it. If there's something more substantive I'm all ears.
Son, you lost this debate pages ago. Move on now.