dkjfzkj wrote:
If using toothpaste containing triclosan, it probably doesn't matter.
It does matter and this can be shown from the science and philosophy of cleaning.
One needs surface/object penetration and exposure and mechanical action as well as coating.
For example, surfactant cleaners advise you to remove debris first and do it on a non porous surface.
If you consider dedusting and laundry, this point is further demonstrated.
Triclosan would expose limited surfaces to antibacterial action but without floss, the big meteor chunks would still be in there and only the surface of those rotting chunks is getting disinfected.
Think about a toilet or floor covered in 3 dimensional irregular feces pieces. It's not enough to spray it with hospital strength Lysol spray; you have to have mechanical action to remove the solid poo and pieces.
Sometimes if you see an old layer of dust that is nasty, you'll notice that even with a strong pressure hose, water force doesn't remove it by itself. The dust adheres. This the case for mechanical action.
Thus I say: when you brush, let the foam suds on your teeth a bit. This is the soak. If you give the soak a little time, just like you would observe from soaking dishes in some soapy water, a little sudsing time is better than rinsing it off right away: chemistry plus mechanics. Furthermore, flossing would be the additional mechanical action needed,
Kapish?