Trump fans: Respond to Khizr Kahn, muslim father who lost his son in Iraq, DEVASTATES Trump at DNC

rojo wrote:

I think Trump's comments about Mexicans were deplorable but I do think his idea of wanting to have an immigration policy that makes sense (not rewarding those who come here illegally) is a sound one.

Rojo tell me you are kidding. Trump never said anything deplorable about Mexicans. Everything he said was true. Some of them are good and some of them are bad. But in general, they bring lots of problems to the US. This is based on facts. It is not deplorable. You are just not used to a politician having the guts to be honest with a significant portion of the voting pool.

Stick to athletics. wrote:

You are joking? Trump has "an immigration policy that makes sense?" Don't make me laugh. A war on a religion and a nationality -- Muslims and Mexicans -- isn't even a policy. It's simple racism -- defined as a negative and sweeping generalisation about a national, religious or perceived ethnic group.

We do not 'reward' illegal immigrants. Far from being 'rewarded' they are subjugated and ignored, despite many of them paying taxes, and their low-wage labour having always been the foundation of the American economy.

Most of our forefathers came from overseas, sometimes through official channels, sometimes not. Shutting the door behind us will only hasten the prolonged destruction of the economy.

Trump's supposed 'policy' is nothing but the foul lashing-out of a chimp, designed to prey on the worst prejudices. You, in condoning such racism, are complicit. Please retract your statement.

You are the on who needs to retract their statement.

Trump was absolutely correct on illegal Mexican immigrants. They bring lots of problems here. It is not racism or generalizing if it is true. Facts from the US government support this.

He did not generalize or declare war on Muslims. He said that he wants a temporary ban on their entry until we have a better way to screen them. There is nothing negative or generalizing in that idea, so what are you talking about???

Illegal Mexican immigrants are rewarded otherwise they wouldn't stay here. They do pay taxes, but their costs outweigh their taxes. Their low wage labor is not the foundation of the US. LEGAL working is the foundation.

Everything you said is incorrect. Please make a retractment.

Hey Rojo,

It would've been more accurate to call your thread: "Fans of Illegal Doping, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump."

It would've been more accurate, since Trump praises Putin and has called Putin a better leader than Obama. Is it logical to fill your website with doping stories and call yourself "drug-free since..." and espouse a strong anti-doping stance, and then turn around and support a politician who praises a different politician, (one who set up the largest and most criminal example of doping to date?) No, it isn't logical at all. It's patently schizoid.

Someone should ask Trump: "What do think of Putin's saturation bombing of the city of Grozny (with huge civilian casualties) during Chechnyan uprising? What do you think of the 56 journalists who have been murdered in Russia since 1992?" and finally, maybe you, Rojo, can ask Trump, "What do you think of the allegations of state-sponsored doping brought against Russia?" As with all-thee-above, we know the answer already.

Is there a 3rd candidate?

Because these two, suck!

'Illegal Mexican immigrants' and many documented immigrants do us all a service by performing the cheap, hard work that Americans won't do. That's how capitalism works. You're dreaming if you think that America was founded on straight-down-the-line, fully-registered official labour. The facts do not show that illegal Mexicans bring 'all sorts of problems'. The facts show that all foreign born ethnicities have LOWER crime rates than the average for US natives (http://www.migrationinformation.org/usfocus/display.cfm?ID=403). Your idea that the 'costs' outweigh the benefits is just ridiculous. Banning all Muslims, temporarily or not, is the very definition of a generalisation. Not all Muslims are the same. When I lived in the world's largest Muslim country (I bet you don't know where that is without Googling it), most people practiced a moderate version of Islam, drinking alcohol, smoking, supporting human rights and condemning extremists. Women didn't wear the veil and most didn't even cover their hair. The vast majority of Muslims are repulsed by terrorism, just as the vast majority of Catholics detested the terrorism of the Irish Republic Army. Would you have banned all Catholics because the IRA killed 1800 people over its 30-year terror campaign?Banning an entire religion (how would that even work?) 'until we develop a better way to screen them' is code for 'blame economic downturn and low wages on easily-victimised scapegoats'. What? All members of a particular religion are somehow 'suspect' until proved otherwise?Have you read the history of mid-twentieth century Europe? Perhaps we could identify all the Muslims by making them sew a special badge on to their clothes? You surely must know that what you're supporting has the darkest, darkest implications.

Hillary fans - respond to the family who lost family members at the 2012 Benghazi attack (because of the Movie)

independent wrote:

Hillary fans - respond to the family who lost family members at the 2012 Benghazi attack (because of the Movie)

What are we responding about?

Lack of support, lies and the death of their loves ones would be a good start...

Sure thing dumbo, don't make me laugh either. A war on Muslims??? You are inherently stupid. They are the ones attacking us you simpleton. Why don't you move over there, I'll help you pack. Illegals crossing the boarding from Mexico, same thing you dimwit. Retract your statement "Stick to athletics".

Stick to athletics. wrote:

You are joking? Trump has "an immigration policy that makes sense?" Don't make me laugh. A war on a religion and a nationality -- Muslims and Mexicans -- isn't even a policy. It's simple racism -- defined as a negative and sweeping generalisation about a national, religious or perceived ethnic group.

We do not 'reward' illegal immigrants. Far from being 'rewarded' they are subjugated and ignored, despite many of them paying taxes, and their low-wage labour having always been the foundation of the American economy.

Most of our forefathers came from overseas, sometimes through official channels, sometimes not. Shutting the door behind us will only hasten the prolonged destruction of the economy.

Trump's supposed 'policy' is nothing but the foul lashing-out of a chimp, designed to prey on the worst prejudices. You, in condoning such racism, are complicit. Please retract your statement.

Lack of support: We have a lot of enemies and a lot of bases to protect. We try our best to allocate our resources effectively based on information available to us, but sadly this is not an infallible system.

Lies: what lies?

Death of their loved ones: Your loved ones served our country greatly and I'm sorry for your loss.

Yeah....that's pretty easy.

humaftw wrote:

Will Hillary bring her girl Huma into the White House with her?

Trump will certainly bring his 13 year old sex-slave girls with him.

Did you watch the liberal media the day after the attack and everyone in eth D party said it was because of a F'n movies, then lied to their family even thought they knew days in advance they needed more support. You have to be F'n kidding??

Don't forget Bill's 12 years olds...

independent wrote:

Did you watch the liberal media the day after the attack and everyone in eth D party said it was because of a F'n movies, then lied to their family even thought they knew days in advance they needed more support. You have to be F'n kidding??

You need to study up on the subject, buddy. That is not an accurate representation of what happened. This explains a lot.

Rojo like to talk tough and what not. It's funny this people take running and this website seriously.

Really...I don't vote all R or D like you...Maybe it time for you to go back to school and study up on the subject....Hillary is one of the most corrupt and dishonest president candidate...

independent wrote:

Really...I don't vote all R or D like you...Maybe it time for you to go back to school and study up on the subject....Hillary is one of the most corrupt and dishonest president candidate...

You don't know how I vote, which is irrelevant regarding your lack of knowledge around Benghazi, as evidenced on this thread.

Really...Tell me what you think you know because the people there wouldn't agree with you..

Tell me you don't vote 90% D and you have a love for the Clintons..

Hillary never publicly blamed the video for the attack, though it was part of the terrorists' motivations, and I don't vote anywhere near 90% D.