So I found a pair of bib-swappers, the aftermath has been interesting.

Last I read, OP was next doing an ultra, so the blogpost might run longer.

integrity wrote:

integrity wrote:

How did they get disqualified? Did they inform the RD themselves, after your blog was posted?

Hi John Doyle and Richard Munro!

http://imgur.com/a/lV1Js

I wonder why their Facebook profiles are gone...

https://www.facebook.com/John.Doyle101?fref=tshttps://www.facebook.com/richard.munro.56?fref=ts

I noticed there was a slight change to the blog, the links to their FB profiles are gone? Did they again threaten to sue you, Rachel?

The first post of this topic is gone. John Doyle and Richard Munro ordered a super injunction.

notacheater wrote:

integrity wrote:

I noticed there was a slight change to the blog, the links to their FB profiles are gone? Did they again threaten to sue you, Rachel?

The first post of this topic is gone. John Doyle and Richard Munro ordered a super injunction.

The OP now finds herself in some hot water. That guy with the cheater blog probably needs to pay attention.

The first post of this topic is gone.

Why didn't the topic just disappear then? Can we still refer to OP?

Administrative mire wrote:

The first post of this topic is gone.

Why didn't the topic just disappear then? Can we still refer to OP?

Is there a over/under bettlng line on when the OP blogpost will disappear?

is there any chance this will now actually create AN INTERESTING aftermath?

hot water wrote:

The OP now finds herself in some hot water. That guy with the cheater blog probably needs to pay attention.

He already cahnged the name from marathoncheat.blogspot to "marathoninvestigation.com"

somebloke wrote:

is there any chance this will now actually create AN INTERESTING aftermath?

After math I had English. Not all that interesting.

Certainly having the OP post be "deleted" is interesting. But that's the aftermath of 200+ responses.

OP originally said her purpose was publicity. But now she deletes the OP? Fuzzy logic, down under.

Here a swap, there a swop wrote:

Are we sure that the OP hasn't swapped blogs with one of her friends?

Maybe the OP post got swopped into a different thread.

The post formerly known as OP said we should share her blogpost. Is this still the case? I don't want to do anything wrong.

The aftermath is finally getting interesting, sort of anyway, I never came across a forum where the first post on which eleven pages of posts is based on get deleted. Ah well, I guess that's LR and Rachel's influence.

I was never clear: what was OP's hope in the first place? That the bib-swappers (alleged) would stop threatening her? Did that happen?

Think before posting wrote:

I was never clear: what was OP's hope in the first place? That the bib-swappers (alleged) would stop threatening her? Did that happen?

Maybe there will be an update after OP runs the ultra. Any idea is NotJohn or NotRich is in that?

I don't think this thread is as popular since the Olympics commenced. Is there a reason for that?

I don't think it is so easy to swap bibs at the Olympics.

According to the other thread, even 55-year-old female triathletes are getting banned for doping down under.

https://www.asada.gov.au/sanctions/gail-singleton

Except that MONA was supposed to be pacing the 3-hour section. But he went too fast and finished soon after OP (2:49:28).

How did OP know/think MONA was pacing 3 hours? Is this corroborated?

Do pacers get docked incentives if they fail to hit the time within an interval? Why couldn't MONA just go slower? Or was this part of the covert scheme to uncover bib-swappers somehow?

Seems to have run at 2:50 for first 10km, then a slow 5km, and then faster again.