DQ Brianna Rollins

malmo wrote:

King and queen wrote:

She was all over queen's lane. I hope there is a protest and DQ

Did you know that Queen's older brother is actually named King?

I suppose that's better than Porsche, Mercedes or Armani. Or in the case of triplets -- Bed, Bath and Beyond ;-)

I'm not gonna bother looking it up but I bet you have to go over your own damn hurdles.

If your foot passes to the side it could pass below hurdle level if the runner in the next lane has already knocked over their hurdle. You could follow them the whole way clearing each hurdle with only one leg.

Congrats on starting a thread that was linked on the first page ! Did you tell your Mom ? I bet she's proud. Did you accomplish anything else of significance this week ?

Nice try patting yourself on the back and trying to make yourself feel good. For me, I think its pretty stupid to start a thread saying to DQ Rollins when you clearly do not know the rules, but think you do. The fact that you were not alone in your thinking is irrelevant. Who cares if a bunch newbies think our Oly Trials champ should be DQd over a rule that doesn't exist ? As far as USATF not enforcing the rules consistently, well, how do you "enforce" a rule that says its OK to run outside of your line and then you do ? Are you saying they should make up a rule on the spot and DQ her ? I never said I was better than you, I just said you didn't know the rules - if you equate that to me being better than you than that's on you, pal.

Bad Wigins wrote:

If your foot passes to the side it could pass below hurdle level if the runner in the next lane has already knocked over their hurdle. You could follow them the whole way clearing each hurdle with only one leg.

If an athlete's foot does pass to the side of their hurdle below the height of the hurdle that is a DQ offence if it is spotted.

She was definitely on the line a number of times. Look up the rule that will give you the answer rather than waiting for the correct answer from these forum losers.

What if you hit your neighboring lane's hurdles? It might not physically impede the neighboring runner, but it could really mentally take them off their game.

Parbuster wrote:

She was definitely on the line a number of times. Look up the rule that will give you the answer rather than waiting for the correct answer from these forum losers.

As has been pointed out to you from many "losers", there is no reason to DQ her.

Learn the rules yourself.

Bad Wigins wrote:

I'm not gonna bother looking it up but I bet you have to go over your own damn hurdles.

If your foot passes to the side it could pass below hurdle level if the runner in the next lane has already knocked over their hurdle. You could follow them the whole way clearing each hurdle with only one leg.

Are there any dipshits on this board who know anything about the sport?

How does a high hurdler go "around" the hurdles? Ever take a glance at how the hurdles are set up? There's no chance at that. Yes. Look it up. You'll finally learn something. No, you don't have to "go over your own damn hurdles". You don't have to stay in your lane either. That's been pointed out multiple times.

Maybe if the Brojos concentrated on allowing posts which have something to do with running on a site named "LetsRun" instead of the racist political crap which permeates this board along with the perpetually long strings of drug posts which have no backing, the site would serve a purpose.

For the dipsticks.

You can't 'hook' a hurdle in the 100 and 110 Hs. The hurdles create a continuous barrier across the track.

moleshoes wrote:

For the dipsticks.

You can't 'hook' a hurdle in the 100 and 110 Hs. The hurdles create a continuous barrier across the track.

Except if you're in lane 1 or lane 8.