This is a good start.
I would like to move on to Brenda Martinez and Colleen Quigley pics with mountain snow.
On second thought, we do not need any mountain snow.
This is a good start.
I would like to move on to Brenda Martinez and Colleen Quigley pics with mountain snow.
On second thought, we do not need any mountain snow.
Americans are so Puritan it sucks.
I wonder if Colleen Quigley would've looked better in these shots or whether it would've been the same deal.
I like wrote:
This is a good start.
I would like to move on to Brenda Martinez and Colleen Quigley pics with mountain snow.
On second thought, we do not need any mountain snow.
The body issue is supposed to showcase muscles, strength. So showing Emma's physique here is the goal, not necessarily round, bouncy bits.
As for Brenda, that girl does not have a single defined muscle on her anywhere:
http://www.usatf.org/Athlete-Bios/Brenda-Martinez/Martinez_Brenda_Mt-SanAnt-Relays13.aspxhttp://thesportingnation.com/sites/default/files/Moscaow2.jpghttp://www.gobrendamartinez.com/file/2014/09/Mageean-Simpson-MartinezFL1-5thAve14.jpgWeed wrote:
I jus gotta say, that girl looks way hotter in bun huggers and a singlet.
This is the case with nearly everyone. I get that ESPN had to come up with something different than SI's swimsuit issue, but the Body Issue is more of a celebrity showcase than a true joy to look at.
Emma looks really lean because she has to be in order to be competitive. She is a beautiful young woman who will probably have a more "womanly" body once she retires and gains 15-20 pounds. I've know women who were top quality runners and had bodies like that (I had no problem looking at them). When they stopped competing, they gained some weight in just the right places and looked incredible.
Men are the same way. Distance runners are extremely lean. When I stopped competing 15 years ago, I started to gain weight and I actually look a lot better now (according to women I know) in my 40's than I did in my late 20's when I was competing.
Overall, Emma Coburn is a beautiful, very fit young woman. She should be very proud of her body. She's worked hard to earn it.
might be wejo wrote:
milethon wrote:She looks amazing there! The body pics were trying to bring out every single ripple in her body... Not very flattering.
Um, you know that these are just as doctored as the first ones. She doesn't look like that in real life.
She actually has black hair, the blonde is photoshopped in
The photographers were dudes and one of them was getting a full frontal view in one of the shots. Was Emma ok with that? Guess so.
Gotta agree with rest of the posters. This photoshoot made her look more masculine than feminine.
I think she looks more masculine than some guys were expecting because she's in the process of contracting a lot of her muscles.
More relaxed, e.g. while standing still or lying on a couch, I think you'd see softer curves.
Besides, anyone who is surprised -- doesn't that imply they haven't seen a runner girl nude before?
you guys act surprised she's stringy
it takes no imagination to realize that most women distance runners are bone and piano wire with the curvy parts worn off
that's what winning looks like.
should have gotten the other top steeplechasers as well (quigley, garcia, o'connor)
liking Emma wrote:
Besides, anyone who is surprised -- doesn't that imply they haven't seen a runner girl nude before?
Hahaha so true. The board has whole gross threads about which 110-pound distance runner is the hottest, yet the little boys blow a gasket when they actually see one naked. That's odd!
That's exactly what I expected her to look like. But I guess we know what kind of women most Letsrunners are with.
Disgusting...That body type does not have one ounce of female. Looks like a dude's body with the face of a woman.
I prefer porn stars.
Agree that these pictures are more of a celebration of her body as a runner than as a beautiful woman. When a snowflake (a snowfake?) can completely obscure your breast.... well, I don't even know what to say. Nevertheless, I'm pretty sure she could take some very worthy boudoir photos if she chose to.
German Fan wrote: The photographers were dudes and one of them was getting a full frontal view in one of the shots. Was Emma ok with that? Guess so.
So...do you think she went shaved or au naturel before undressing for the shoot?
You guys are on a running forum and you're surprised at what an elite female looks like naked. Go watch volleyball for christ's sake if curves are your thing. Emma is H O T and beautiful.
I could've shot better photos....seriously.
First, they should have used some of that fake tan stuff that body builders use.
Who wants realism? I want those 50's Vargas girls. Most of you are probably too young to know what a Vargas girl is. Google it.
Weed wrote:
I jus gotta say, that girl looks way hotter in bun huggers and a singlet.
She looks quite fine, but seeing these photos was not necessary, and I see no reason for this.
hey listen wrote:
She is beautiful though.
http://hardcastlefilmphoto.com/emma-coburn-photos-in-boulder-colorado/
Angry Willy wrote:
Much nicer pics.
Those are much better.