Ultimate hypocrite? Mark Zuckerberg mocks Trump yet builds huge wall around his house, jogs with security detail

Good summary

Rojo, let me ask you this question, would you let people immigrate to and live in your house?

yet, net immigration has been negative for a good deal of time since 9/11 and obama's deported a record #, by far beyond the records of the bush administration. not a problem.

jjjjjj wrote:

yet, net immigration has been negative for a good deal of time since 9/11 and obama's deported a record #, by far beyond the records of the bush administration. not a problem.

Great for Obama, but Hillary promised she will stop deportations.

100% correct. He sells your privacy for his millions but his is so sacred. This guy is a scheming loser. It wasn't enough he stole ideas off the other twins. I can't wait till a lightening strikes down on his house while he is chocking his chicken.

wejo wrote:

rojo wrote:

Also why does Zuck jog with a huge security detail?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3464044/Isn-t-work-T-shirt-Mark-Zuckerberg-heads-jog-wearing-trusty-uniform-carrying-phone.html

You're seriously asking this question -w hy does he run with a security detail? Because he's worth billions and is concerned for his safety and having a security detail costs him virtually nothing.

3/10

Wait. You gave a serious answer to his question and then gave a troll rating?!?

WTF?

Moo Goo wrote:

100% correct. He sells your privacy for his millions but his is so sacred. This guy is a scheming loser. It wasn't enough he stole ideas off the other twins. I can't wait till a lightening strikes down on his house while he is chocking his chicken.

Wait, what? He sells your privacy? Would that be the "privacy" that you voluntarily post online?

Serious question - are you insane?

short bus conservativ wrote:

Limousine Liberals wrote:

So far most liberals here have said it's okay for Zuckerberg to hold himself to a different standard than the rest of the American people because he's a billionaire. This is coming from liberals! What a world we live in.

Is it really that hard to see the difference between a public entity and a private one?

I guess it depends on whether you view America as public domain to every single person on the planet, or just Americans. Zuckerberg is a globalist, so he believes the former.

I view it as the latter. I'm all for letting people visit our property but they can't stay indefinitely and, if they're causing problems, we have the right to evict them. Having a wall makes it easier to control who visits. If it's somebody who has caused problems in the past, it will make it easier to keep them out.

Mexico's government IS helping its citizens illegally cross into the U.S.

wejo wrote:

rojo wrote:

Also why does Zuck jog with a huge security detail?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3464044/Isn-t-work-T-shirt-Mark-Zuckerberg-heads-jog-wearing-trusty-uniform-carrying-phone.html

You're seriously asking this question -w hy does he run with a security detail? Because he's worth billions and is concerned for his safety and having a security detail costs him virtually nothing.

3/10

Fun fact: I post as "might be wejo" because rojo's posting style is too obvious.

I can't believe I read all seven pages of this thread and no one mentioned the single biggest problem with Rojo's analogy. Let me break it down for you:

Immigration into the U.S. is a good thing. Immigrants pay more in taxes than they receive in government benefits. They help support our aging population, which will continue to grow older as the baby boomers retire in greater numbers. They take jobs Americans don't want, thereby improving the efficiency of our economy. Then when you consider the improvements in economic opportunity that immigrants are afforded, you can see that immigration is really a win-win situation. Good for immigrants, good for the United States.

Conversely, breaking into a private home is a bad thing. People who break into another person's home are typically burglars, thieves, or vandals. The owner of the property does not benefit from their arrival. In fact, their arrival typically hurts the owner's finances. This situation is not win-win. Good for thieves, bad for property owners.

Obviously, Zuckerberg is in favor of immigration and opposed to thieves. Therefore, he makes statements supporting immigration and takes measures to protect himself against thieves.

That position is not hypocritical at all. In fact, it makes a lot of sense.

So one is a xenophobe who's running for president who wants to keep people out of this country and ban Muslims and the other is a pencil necked geek who wants to protect himself in the age of weirdos killing American Idol contestants. Yeah I see the relationship there. Rojo, wejo def got all the smarts in your family. Sorry pal.

Rockgip wrote:

I can't believe I read all seven pages of this thread and no one mentioned the single biggest problem with Rojo's analogy. Let me break it down for you:

Most of us were stunned by the sheer stupidity of it to respond. It's seriously on the level of a Facebook post (you know the one) that says "if you're so in favor of immigration why do you have a front door"

need help

is it hypocritical or ironic if you attend Ivy League and can't use spellcheck?

or just stupid.

Rojo wrote:

reallyrojo? wrote:

So do you agree with what they are both doing (nationalist, isolation) or disagree?

I'm just creating an interesting discussion for the message board and trying to get people to think.

Why is it 'wrong' to build a wall around your country but fine to do it around your house?

Rojo, I've given you the benefit of the doubt a lot before, and maybe, mayyyybbbe you're just acting like a twat for the sake of generating an argument, but do you not realize the difference in scale between a private property (albeit a large one like Zuckerberg's probably is) and an entire country? Do you realize that one is practical and the other is not? Tell you what, if you can give me a correct answer to that question, I will actually fill out some of your running shoe surveys for once.

If he lives in Silicon Valley, he's probably surrounded by "legal" hardworking immigrants. Probably scared s##tless. Hence the wall.

;-)

Wait Wait What? wrote:

Moo Goo wrote:

100% correct. He sells your privacy for his millions but his is so sacred. This guy is a scheming loser. It wasn't enough he stole ideas off the other twins. I can't wait till a lightening strikes down on his house while he is chocking his chicken.

Wait, what? He sells your privacy? Would that be the "privacy" that you voluntarily post online?

Serious question - are you insane?

Many don't seem to understand that Facebook users are the product that Facebook sells.

Remembers When wrote:

I haven't read the 120 responses but, seriously, I cannot believe Rojo is actually trying to draw and analogy between what Trump did and what Zuckerberg did. This must be some form of satire.

Actually, it's an average ivy league education.

LastChanceRunner wrote:

If he lives in Silicon Valley, he's probably surrounded by "legal" hardworking immigrants. Probably scared s##tless. Hence the wall.

;-)

OK, so this is emblematic of letsrun. A bunch of morons getting themselves worked up while having no idea of the actual story.

1. He lives in Hawaii.

2. There was already a wall.

3. He expanded the wall.

4. Walls of this sort are common where he lives, partially for security, partially for privacy, partially as a noise block.

But hey, feel free to make jackass assumptions, everyone (mostly rojo), because I'm sure you'd love to have everyone judge you for every move you make as well.

This question was phrased in an extremely biased way that clearly reveals your opinion that Mr. Zuckerberg is the ultimate hypocrite