Frank Spinner wrote:
verbose wrote:why did it take 101 pages to just point to the cadence data? Had to justify the paycheck?
The cadence data was the smoking gun that we wanted all along... Must have been the easiest pay day ever for these guys.
Yep, the appropriate questions were already asked well before the academics arrived. Skins could've dumped the raw watch data here and on the ulist and had the same charts in 48 hours free of charge. Of course they haven't appeared remotely bright from the get go. The cadence data is no more damning than the stuck rv incident, Asher's videos, the tracker data, the challenges from really good runners, or reading between the not so subtle lines of the Geezer's reports.
Does Skins not employ a single hobby runner to tell them RY had obviously cheated months ago? Maybe not since they sent an intern out to try and coordinate a month long wr attempt by a mediocre runner with a blatantly inflated past. No one at skins even looked at RY's nonsensical claimed pr progression and called BS. No one looked into a claimed career as a professional cyclist?!? Congrats to them for following through and slamming the door shut, but the self back patting for commissioning a 100 page report basically akin to determining the color of the sky is a bit irritating.
Do not challenge him to run 3 marathons as he claimed unless you give him 2 weeks or less to do it. He's probably capable of those times with 6 months of training.