OK the google imagery is not the exactly same lane closure I think, but similar. On the regenerated Joanna activity, the closure is mile 8.6 to 12.6.
OK the google imagery is not the exactly same lane closure I think, but similar. On the regenerated Joanna activity, the closure is mile 8.6 to 12.6.
Investigator wrote:
OK the google imagery is not the exactly same lane closure I think, but similar. On the regenerated Joanna activity, the closure is mile 8.6 to 12.6.
Sorry messed that up.
AZ DOT lane closure is mile marker 81 to 84, which on strava is 8.7 (just about where east/west split up) to 11.7 (right when they backtrack) on the activity
I've got approximate start times based on intersecting the first point with the tracker data. Technically, it assigns the time based on the nearest tracker data so it could be some minutes off (usually less than 6 I would imagine). Better would be to search among the first 10 GPX points for the best match and use that as a reference. This is assuming the watch isn't stopped for the whole run.
I actually now have the nearest tracker point and timestamp for every point in all of the non-timestamped data. Just trying to figure out how to stitch the times back into the GPX file.
The point is that it's becoming clearer that SKINS and ceo Fuller were totally aware of this scam from the beginning. He's trying to brush this off and hopes it blows over.
Point Made wrote:
I was just checking in to see what you all were still talking about. The guy cheated. You proved it a couple thousand pages ago. What now is the point of all this?
And bonus, I finally brought Case's 3-minute data in so we have data from the Geezer days in my batch as well.
How's that Skins investigation coming along? I remember roughly a week ago it was in 1-3 days that they will announce something?
I just got here. What'd I miss?
Wearing SKINS sounds bloody.
John C. Lately wrote:
I just got here. What'd I miss?
Just 440 pages of joy.
Who was that skins employee that was part of the RV crew? He's got some splaining to do Lucy!
Was he a pseudo employee or truly on the Skins payroll? There is no way that anybody in the RV is not in on the scam.
The same thought crossed my mind. Can anyone recommend a good alternative? I used WS since they just ran it, but it would be easy to switch out. Unfortunately, I don't know of many ultras.
My wife spends way to much money at ULTRA. And all the girls that work there have attitudes and are full of themselves. Hate that place!
Investigator wrote:
Investigator wrote:OK the google imagery is not the exactly same lane closure I think, but similar. On the regenerated Joanna activity, the closure is mile 8.6 to 12.6.
Sorry messed that up.
AZ DOT lane closure is mile marker 81 to 84, which on strava is 8.7 (just about where east/west split up) to 11.7 (right when they backtrack) on the activity
Strava must have a wider smoothing or something and just miss the mile because of the backtrack. They show fastest mile at 3:44. But - I've tried TWO separate desktop applications and they are both revealing much faster paces.
Rob was doing 50kph right up to that backtrack (where the lane closure ends). A 1:56 mile, gaining 300ft:
http://imgur.com/a/QjqooThis segment was posted on his wife's Strava account, and then deleted? I'm guessing a quick thinking forum member grabbed it in time? It also sounds like we did some manipulation on the data? Are there any other segments he has uploaded that overlap (IE is this a "missing" segment)?
Essentially what I'm asking is how we prove this came from Rob. For a journalist or even the blog we need to clearly state how we obtained this data.
Rocky Raccoon in Texas. The total elevation is 5,375 ft, one of the flatter 100s.
The CR is 12:38 which is 7:38.
This would support how hard it would be for RY to even run sub 7s when climbing.
Do we still have the link for the now empty Joanna account? I mean, a screenshot, the fact that I don't think Joanna Hanasz was trying to concurrently set a transcon record, and that these activities were deleted once we started talking about them are pretty good evidence that it was really Rob Young using that account.
I really like this new 1:56 mile/deleted activity/speeding up in the RV due to lane closure stuff. Will try for a new blog post tonight.
Investigator wrote:[/b
Rob was doing 50kph right up to that backtrack (where the lane closure ends). A 1:56 mile, gaining 300ft:
http://imgur.com/a/Qjqoo
Hater! You are just jealous that you can't run 50kph up a mountain.
Don't listen to these mean people Robbie! You have Grit. (And we are gutted to read the hatred)
Amazing.
One could check Rob's friend list if he has friends with this names.
Quick backup:
http://archive.is/pfk59http://archive.is/rapQOGreat catch.
If i remember right, the start and end locations of this run matches up nicely with Rob's other strava runs before/after it.
Agree we definitely need to explain how we got this file too