There is also no GPS data for RYs RAUSA run. The important thing about RY is that he NEVER shows any data. All his claimed feats have been done without data to prove them. This must be the main theme when nailing him down.
There is also no GPS data for RYs RAUSA run. The important thing about RY is that he NEVER shows any data. All his claimed feats have been done without data to prove them. This must be the main theme when nailing him down.
As long as nobody checks…reality control is easy.
Once people started checking on Robbie…reality control meltdown started.
Now we know he has been a pathological liar since at least 2004…and probably earlier.
Was it Robbie that decided to add 'avulsion' to his fracture?
That was really dumb. It was a fracture of his 5th toe. They reported it as his BIG (1st) toe. Whoops.
No. It was on the smallest toe of his foot. It was not an avulsion fracture.
Everything about Robbie is made bigger, better, faster, stronger, longer, and more awesome.
During the year when Robbie ran 10,178 miles, he averaged 27.88 miles per day for 365 days, with zero rest days. That is 195 miles per week for all 52 weeks of the year.
If you question any of his constructed reality…then you are a hater.
http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Robert+Young/Peace+Sport+8th+International+Forum/mCmh2hQZHkY
Welcome to 1984.
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
22 June 2016Comments 0
Just a quick note to respond to all the comments related to Rob Young on my most recent blog concerning Dustin Johnson.
First, thanks very much for reading it. 🙂
Second, thank you also for bringing the allegations about Robert Young’s record-breaking trans-continental attempt to my attention. Although almost all of you have given your comments by use of a first name only, and I have also received an anonymous email with similar allegations, I have read them and do take them seriously.
I have been assured by Rob, his manager and the Swiss-based SKINS staff member travelling with Rob that no ‘cheating’ occurred. Nonetheless, SKINS is true to its brand values and obviously these concerns warrant attention.
I have, therefore, made arrangements for this matter be investigated as soon as possible by an independent expert. I shall let you know who that is once their appointment is confirmed.
In addition to available data, the independent review will no doubt look at the comments on my blog also. If any of you wish to provide additional information that is not anonymous, you are welcome to do so.
Thanks again for your concern. You can be assured I want to find out what’s gone on here also.
In the meantime, please see here a media statement from SKINS on this matter.
Going to have an independent review
Wayne.... wrote:
http://teamskins.net.au/SKINS-Rob-Young-Statement.pdfGoing to have an independent review
British Marathonman Robert Young withdraws from North American
Trans-Con Record Attempt
Small fracture plus an infection in right foot derails Young’s pursuit at history
Steinhausen, Switzerland, June 21, 2016 – After covering more than 2,000 miles in an attempt to break
the 36-year-old world record for the fastest run across America, Robert Young has withdrawn from the
attempted record breaking run due to medical reasons. Young was attempting to shatter American
Frank Giannino Jr.‘s feat set in 1980, when he trekked from San Francisco to New York City in 46 days,
eight hours, and 36 minutes.
Upon his arrival into Indianapolis last week, Young experienced soreness in a toe in his right foot, which
X-rays confirmed a cellulitus infection and fracture. After an intense therapy treatment of icing and
antibiotics, the decision was made by Young to renounce his pursuit of the record.
“We are incredibly proud of Robert’s attempt to set a new Guinness Book of World Record, especially an
achievement that requires such a physical demand on both the body and mind,†said Jaimie Fuller,
Chairman of SKINS. “Unfortunately we were confronted with several claims that Robert’s World Record
attempt was subject to cheating. We truly believe that Robert has done his attempt in an honest
manner without cheating. One of our own Swiss-based employees was with Robert from the very start
of the run and has reported regularly back to us that everything is above board. Nevertheless, SKINS is a
brand that stands for integrity and transparency in sport.â€
Over the last four years, SKINS has actively campaigned on issues around honesty, transparency and
good governance. SKINS will appoint a qualified independent person with standing within the running
community to review Robert’s world record attempt in-depth, including his GPS data to investigate and
analyse the accusations that have been made, and will share these findings independently from Robert
or SKINS with the running community. SKINS will continue to work with Robert in the future, so he can
compete at the highest level in all of his upcoming races and record-attempting ventures.
Young’s journey across the United States commenced in Huntington Beach, CA, on Saturday, May 14
and ran through California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri and Illinois,
averaging more than 60 miles per day.
For more information about SKINS, visit
www.skins.netor visit us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
Wayne.... wrote:
http://teamskins.net.au/SKINS-Rob-Young-Statement.pdfGoing to have an independent review
Independent review... could be good for us, or could just be a shill used to save face and sweep the dodgy data under the rug.
If the reviewer gets the data, will RY still release it to the public as he said he would?
Could the data already be doctored before reaching the 'independent reviewer'?
Is the reviewer actually independent?
Oliver Weingarten â€@OWeingarten 3h3 hours ago
Independent investigation announced by @jaimiefuller & welcomed by @MarathonMan_UK in respect of attempt at Run Across America & accusations
GetMoreFootage wrote:
If anyone wants to help find more video of a ghost RV. They can explain it away once but not multiple times.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GLsAfGQDdpZbE-Ky2FklFbarNyenbCdhWAUXXCyTq5s/edit?usp=sharingI was specifically looking at this stretch. The dude covers 50 miles in 7 hours overnight, then 17 miles over the next 11 daylight hours, then back to 61 miles overnight in 8.5 hours, then ... repeats. You get the idea. He is avoiding the sun you are just JEALOUS lets see you get out there and attempt this record!! /s
http://seejohnrun.com/257miles.html
Great work! Let's crowdsource this.
RYinvestigator wrote:
GetMoreFootage wrote:If anyone wants to help find more video of a ghost RV. They can explain it away once but not multiple times.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GLsAfGQDdpZbE-Ky2FklFbarNyenbCdhWAUXXCyTq5s/edit?usp=sharingI was specifically looking at this stretch. The dude covers 50 miles in 7 hours overnight, then 17 miles over the next 11 daylight hours, then back to 61 miles overnight in 8.5 hours, then ... repeats. You get the idea. He is avoiding the sun you are just JEALOUS lets see you get out there and attempt this record!! /s
http://seejohnrun.com/257miles.htmlGreat work! Let's crowdsource this.
Being a little pessimistic here... but do you not think most businesses would have wiped their CCTV after a week or two?
Please use a full name for further comments: http://watercooler.skins.net/2016/06/22/response-to-comments/
I don't know how to edit the Google doc so it shows the before and after for his runbritain rankings (and notes that it was Po10 who changed it, on request). Could someone do this please?
Here's our chance. LRC needs to appoint an independent investigator to work along side the one that SKINS is appointing. If the one from SKINS gets full access then we will actually have someone able to see the data. If the data is bogus, we'd have someone to at least point out that no data ever showed up. If it's truly independent, then LRC providing one at our own cost should be a non issue. Simply there to observe
Dick Puke wrote:
Here's our chance. LRC needs to appoint an independent investigator to work along side the one that SKINS is appointing. If the one from SKINS gets full access then we will actually have someone able to see the data. If the data is bogus, we'd have someone to at least point out that no data ever showed up. If it's truly independent, then LRC providing one at our own cost should be a non issue. Simply there to observe
I hereby nominate Fake Laz as our candidate. He will surely represent all that is holy about our hallowed community.
Independent investigator... Hmm, who would that be? Rob Young is clearly not independent, so it can't be him. And Michael Sphincter works at SKINS. Oh, I get it, they will nominate Dustin Brooks as the independent investigator!
optimistic wrote:
Wayne.... wrote:http://teamskins.net.au/SKINS-Rob-Young-Statement.pdfGoing to have an independent review
Independent review... could be good for us, or could just be a shill used to save face and sweep the dodgy data under the rug.
If the reviewer gets the data, will RY still release it to the public as he said he would?
Could the data already be doctored before reaching the 'independent reviewer'?
Is the reviewer actually independent?
This could be the way to not release the data. The independent reviewer could be someone not really independent.
Why did Jaimie say that SKINS would support Robbie in his future feats when Jaimie does not even know if Robbie is a cheating liar or not yet?
I think he should wait until the 'independent' review finds Robbie to be totally honest about everything.
It seems like he has already decided to back Robbie in the future.
cue a whitewash. Time for Rojo to get involved and appoint someone to serve on the 'independant' review, otherwise we all know what will happen to golden boy ... nowt
rojo should be in on that independent review.
can't think of a catchy name wrote:
but I felt like the person in the tape toed out while they walked, while RY ran with toes straight or the right foot toed slightly in.
Well, that explains it then.
It still blows me away that Rob is a "world champion extreme endurance runner" but still hasn't figured out the running socks game yet.
independent my a$$ wrote:
Independent investigator... Hmm, who would that be? Rob Young is clearly not independent, so it can't be him. And Michael Sphincter works at SKINS. Oh, I get it, they will nominate Dustin Brooks as the independent investigator!
And CoachKev raises his hand...