chilhowee wrote:
yo 100%
I'm not interested in debating definitions with you. Semenya may lack a penis but she's got internal testes, which give her male levels of testosterone and an overmuscled, male physique. Last year, prior the CAS ruling, Semenya could not dominate in the way she does now. She is reaping the ludicrous benefits of profoundly out-of-touch legal decision, a decision that lets her take prize money from legitimate female athletes in Diamond League races. Before the CAS's ruling, when she was on the IAAF's medicated regime, she was good but not dominant. Now she crushes the world's best female 800 runners and then want to shake hands and pretend things are "normal." She's a thief. And a clown (And a man.)
So restore the CAS ruling that she needed to get hormone treatment. That seemed to resolve the advantage that she had.
Otherwise, the very nature of the issue is going to be all about definitions, seeing as Semenya very obviously is interest, and there very obviously, as a result, have to be a dividing line drawn somewhere.
If she can compete without the advantage as a women, then who's interest does it serve exactly to force her to compete as a man?