2. ... wrote:
dffffdfdnggnfxhsc wrote:2. The "evidence" that was made public in this case by the Gouchers and Magness was laughably flimsy ...
LOL ... epic failure to understand evidence.
Testosterone = testoboost = LOL.
Prescription drugs from one person with the label removed were give to a person without a prescription for that drug = LOL.
Sending prescription drugs stealthy through the mail to avoid detection by the authorities = LOL.
Testoboost is not a banned substance by WADA. It probably has about as much effectiveness as the magical underwear that Mormons wear.
Legal issue, not a doping violation if the person taking them had a TUE and they did.
Potential legal issue, not a doping violation. Not a single shred of evidence that it was a banned substance.
Hating a person or group of people, does not mean that you get to claim every wild story as absolute proof of doping. The quality of the public allegations was terrible, they read like conspiracy theory website written by a crazy person. There are rules that have to be followed before you get your scalp.