AJ Dropping Bombs on Lagat

Acosta wrote:

Oh boy...throwin serious shade at Lagat

https://mobile.twitter.com/omfgchocotaco/status/736468167921262593

Obviously, I'm am all for anti-doping, and athletes standing up for clean sport, but AJ is really trolling here.

He is going to instigate a huge response, and he isn't capable of having a thorough discussion over twitter.

Daaaaamn lol. That's intense.

Clerk wrote:

Acosta wrote:

Oh boy...throwin serious shade at Lagat

https://mobile.twitter.com/omfgchocotaco/status/736468167921262593

Obviously, I'm am all for anti-doping, and athletes standing up for clean sport, but AJ is really trolling here.

He is going to instigate a huge response, and he isn't capable of having a thorough discussion over twitter.

I got trolled. I have no idea what I'm looking at.

Can we stop with the "shade" usage? Who says that?

Posts at 1am only mean 1 thing 🍺🍻🍾🍺🍻🍾🍺🍻

Thank you. Worst term ever, "throwing shade" -- another reach to try a new term and it didn't work out.

Is Acosta even relevant anymore? UO athletes claiming cheating ... interesting since they have about 40 athletes on full rides there.

AJ is obviously angry he is not competitive in the running world, and even more angry he cannot beat a 40+ year old.

AJ will eventually unload on fellow Ducks because he can't beat them: Centro, Wheating, etc.

Does aj even run anymore??

AJ NATION 4 LYFE!!!!!! 💩💩💩💩💩

Dude, why you throwing shade on the rest of us for the way we talk? Go watch some Golden Girls, you fvcking dinosaur.

Dingleberry Bobby wrote:

Does aj even run anymore??

He has become a hobby runner--has to have a real job. He will soon be a hobby jogger. Ergo, the pain of it all.

A sample positive does not mean that the runner doped. We have a b sample for a reason. False positives exist in all tests.

Gonna go throw some sun! No one says "throwing shade" out there, not even pre-milliennials.

The A sample and B sample are the same exact pee, just split into two different cups. It is very likely that his B sample was a simple cover up that was paid off.

Just look at his progression In.1997 he runs 3:41 for Washington state. The next summer while out of college he runs a 3:34, and then the next year while representing Kenya, he runs a 3:30! The progression is just very odd as soon as he starts running for Kenya again.

I have just one question:

Who is AJ Acosta?

BasicLogic wrote:

The A sample and B sample are the same exact pee, just split into two different cups. It is very likely that his B sample was a simple cover up that was paid off.

Just look at his progression In.1997 he runs 3:41 for Washington state. The next summer while out of college he runs a 3:34, and then the next year while representing Kenya, he runs a 3:30! The progression is just very odd as soon as he starts running for Kenya again.

Then there should 100s of other positive samples. But there are none. The real answer is that sample was contaminated, most likely intentionally by someone much like yourself.

Certainly Not Skuj wrote:

I have just one question:

Who is AJ Acosta?

Correction: Who "was" AJ Acosta.

Real Logic wrote:

[quote]BasicLogic wrote:

Then there should 100s of other positive samples. But there are none. The real answer is that sample was contaminated, most likely intentionally by someone much like yourself.

That makes no sense whatever.

The "results" of the A never should have been announced as they were. It's a long story and it has many ugly parts to it. But we don't care about facts at LR, do we? AJ Acosta sure doesn't care. He should.