one to go wrote:
As I see it, the 800m is the only event that is affected in such a way that it could likely alter the NCAA field at the contender level.
From 400m down, you're going all out anyway. There's not much strategy involved. If you don't win your heat, you should at least be among the next six fastest times if you are going to contend at NCAA.
Steeple, 5000m and 10000m are unchanged.
That leaves the 800 and 1500. In the 1500, top two each of four heats, and next four fastest finishers, isn't drastically bad. If you're a serious NCAA 1500 contender, you should have enough running room to be able to get at least second place in a field divided into four heats (that only represents half the country to begin with).
800m is tricky, granted. Top finisher in each of six heats and next six fastest times, just like the sprints. The NCAA contenders need to make a decision about taking the pace to avoid getting pipped at the finish in a slow heat.
As a fan, I find this fascinating. The 1500 isn't normally run for time. You could be like a potential scorer but only 3rd best guy in your heat. Do you go our hard? I bet that everyone will do what all 1500 guys do - let it go slow. It drives me nuts.
I agree the 800 is tough as you can get nipped by anyone.
I think it shows you though how much of track is unneccesary. The more I think about it and read this thread I'm like, "what really happens in the prelims anyway."