Bad Wigins wrote:
I re-watched the video of that 800 and it was clearly not a legal start, nor did it affect everyone the same. Rudisha was caught off guard, the guy in lane 8 was bewildered and didn't know whether to run
and the guy in lane 9 was facing the wrong direction and not on his mark. I'm not gonna dig up the starting rules but I'm sure the pistol can't be fired until everyone is on their mark. If someone had challenged the result I bet it would have been upheld.
When you say "on your mark," you wait for them all to get on their mark, and they have to be motionless too. A good starter is nitpicky about this.
Rudisha was the bewildered runner in Lane 8.
Runners affected the most by this in descending order were:
Lane 9: Bram Som the pacer. He was facing the wrong way and was not actually in his designated start area at all. Which is actually sensible given that the official was standing on the track immediately in front of him. He didn't start until the rest of the field had 30 - 40 meters on him.
Lane 8: Rudisha. He was standing up straight and not on his mark when the gun fired, threw his hands up in the air in confusion, and took about 2-3 seconds to actually start running.
Lane 7: Job Kinyor. He was standing up straight and not on his mark, just like Rudisha, and more or less had the same issue. When he started, he floundered for a bit, looking like he had no idea what was happening.
Lane 3: Antoine Gakeme. It looked like he was actually on the mark at the start, but had his hands on his knees. His start was delayed enough that Alfred Kipketer, who started from an upright position, was ahead of him immediately after the gun went off.
Lane 3: Alfred Kipketer. He was standing upright, but appeared to have the best start among the unprepared runners.
I have no idea how the race was started given that a race official was standing and waving a flag between Lane 8 and Lane 9.