another 800 guy wrote:
Blah Blah Blah. wrote:Why does Obama hate women?
He identifies as one. Ask ANYONE who went to HS with him.
Link to quotes from people who went to school with him? And not a link to someone making the claim that people who went to school with him say that.
Hey another 800 guy wrote:
another 800 guy wrote:He identifies as one. Ask ANYONE who went to HS with him.
Link to quotes from people who went to school with him? And not a link to someone making the claim that people who went to school with him say that.
Yeah, good luck getting a reputable link to that accusation. If 800 guy even tries, it will probably also have some wacky claim that Michelle is actually a man.
defend yourselves, libpervs wrote:
Is it so that not a single one of the libtards here defends this decree? The only thing they seem to do (as usual) is to pour their hate onto DiscoGary.
What are all of you sick libtards views on this decree?
Still waiting.
I was fearful something like this would might happenin 5 years but never thought it would. This is ABSURD. My god. I thought the OP must be making this up. But it's true.
THIS IS JUST ABURD. I'm all for people using whatever freaking bathroom (NOT SHOWER IF THERE'S NO DOOR) they want. I'm all for people doing whatever the hell they want in the bedroom. But play whatever sport they want w/o treatment? Are you stupid?
It's a fact there is a biological difference between men and women. Is that not obvious? Why are there no women in major league baseball or the NFL? They can try as hard as they like but they just aren't as good because they lack testicles and lots of testosterone.
Why can't I give birth to a baby? Because I don't have ovaries.
The whole point of this law is said to insure that people "can attend school in an environment free from discrimination based on sex."
Are the liberals that stupid? Women's sports is by definition discrimination. It discriminates (against men) so women can be good at sports.
Do people realize the way this is written it applies to colleges right? If I had a HS boy, I'd tell him right now to join the girls team. No one can question him on it. No one. It's against the law to ask him if it's legit. Then he could run 4:35 in the mile and a public college would have to offer him, i mean her, a scholarship.
This is Caster Semenya x 10. Under this stupid law, Bruce Jenner I mean Caitlyn could have competed in the women's Olympics.
I want to start a petition but we need a liberal woman to lead it. We need someone like Montano of Ajee to become the face against this. It's so absurd. Please email
if you are female and super libearl and willing to stand up against this.
canspo wrote:
I do not agree with the locker room policies where it involves changing and/or showering. That being said, the fear mongering that child molesters are going to be lining up to run into bathrooms and that our sports will be over-run by boys taking over girls sports are over the top.
I don't care how many times it happens. If it happens once, that's more than enoguh. How many times does Alysia Montano need to be screwed out of a medal.
jjjjjj wrote:
Prohibiting discrimination based on age does not mean that you can make legal claims to an age that is not your own.
Why not? We already have been mandated to call Caitlyn Jenner a girl even though she still has a penis. Caitlyn has made a legal claim to a sex that was not her own based on the fact that she had and still has a penis which produced offspring.
Where do we draw the line? Can I identify as black and benefit from affirmative action?
rojo wrote:
I want to start a petition but we need a liberal woman to lead it. We need someone like Montano of Ajee to become the face against this. It's so absurd. Please email
robertjohnson@letsrun.comif you are female and super libearl and willing to stand up against this.
The other option would be to find a conservative HS boy who is willing to swtich ovder and just dominate. Let's get like the #8 guy on Fayetteville Manlius boys team. If you know of a HSer that wants to compete in girls sports in 2016-2017 please have them contact me. I'll try to talk them into it and will handle their media interviews.
By decree, no one can question it. No one.
rojo wrote:
Please email
robertjohnson@letsrun.comif you are female and super libearl and willing to stand up against this.
I can identify as a female and super liberal if it helps the cause.
You know, for all the pearl-clutching in reaction to this decree, I really don't think your fears of boys deciding to join girls times simply so they can set records is going to happen.
NotFarEnough wrote:
You know, for all the pearl-clutching in reaction to this decree, I really don't think your fears of boys deciding to join girls times simply so they can set records is going to happen.
Well I'd mandate my kid do it so they could a) go for free or b) go Ivy league.
One other thing I was thinking is this law makes no sense logically. Liberals have taught us that transgender, homosexuality,e tc is biological. It's not a choice. This decree ignores biology totally. It acts like having two balls doesn't impact sports or mean you can't get pregnant.
defend yourselves, libpervs wrote:
defend yourselves, libpervs wrote:Is it so that not a single one of the libtards here defends this decree? The only thing they seem to do (as usual) is to pour their hate onto DiscoGary.
What are all of you sick libtards views on this decree?
Still waiting.
Come on liberals of LRC. Where are you? Speak up. Calling you out:
Precious Roy
Flagpole
Agip
Conundrum
Bad Wigins
Chewbaca
jjjjjj
;)
wtfunny
Dora the Agrophobiac
TRexing
Keith Stone
rojo wrote:
NotFarEnough wrote:You know, for all the pearl-clutching in reaction to this decree, I really don't think your fears of boys deciding to join girls times simply so they can set records is going to happen.
Well I'd mandate my kid do it so they could a) go for free or b) go Ivy league.
Your reactionary self says that, but when it comes down it in reality, would you actually tell your kid to do that? Would your kid willingly take up your suggestion and 'identify' as a girl to compete against other girls?
Let's face it--unless your kid genuinely does identify as another gender, it ain't gonna happen.
Enough crazy things happen in America that someone is bound to do it, now that the law allows it.
NotFarEnough wrote:
Let's face it--unless your kid genuinely does identify as another gender, it ain't gonna happen.
Wow. Libs' naivety never stops to surprise me.
Caster will win gold in Rio.
Therefore, I don't see anything wrong if a HS boy (who identifies as a girl) wins FL on the girl side.
When will this happen?
Sooner than we think, I am sure...
He has really put these school administrators in a bind.
IF a boy decides he wants to play on the girls basketball team they are kinda screwed either way.
They look like fools for letting a guy play and destroy girls on the court. OR they risk being called bigots and losing fed. money and drawing national attention to yourself and your district.
Glad Im not making that call.
DiscoGary wrote:
Allow students to participate in sex-segregated activities and access sex-segregated facilities consistent with their gender identity;"
So any male who identifies as a female can now participate on girls teams ....
Ah, no. I don't think that the phrase "sex-segregated activities" means interschool women's sports. Intramural, perhaps. But not competitive athletics in the standard inter-school way that we're all thinking about. We're not going to have Fred-become-Fredrika running on the women's crosscountry team at Central HS.
I could be wrong about that, but I just can't believe that the Federal Government could be that stupid.
Keep it on the crete wrote:
Enough crazy things happen in America that someone is bound to do it, now that the law allows it.
You know brah! There's some lawyer out there just dying for his kid to be a test case.
NotFarEnough wrote:
rojo wrote:Well I'd mandate my kid do it so they could a) go for free or b) go Ivy league.
Your reactionary self says that, but when it comes down it in reality, would you actually tell your kid to do that? Would your kid willingly take up your suggestion and 'identify' as a girl to compete against other girls?
Let's face it--unless your kid genuinely does identify as another gender, it ain't gonna happen.
It's gonna happen sooner than you think.
BigDuh wrote:
He has really put these school administrators in a bind.
IF a boy decides he wants to play on the girls basketball team they are kinda screwed either way.
They look like fools for letting a guy play and destroy girls on the court. OR they risk being called bigots and losing fed. money and drawing national attention to yourself and your district.
Glad Im not making that call.
Some school will refuse to play along with the Government perverts, get sued, and win in the SC. No way it's going to hold up.
KudzuRunner wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:Allow students to participate in sex-segregated activities and access sex-segregated facilities consistent with their gender identity;"
So any male who identifies as a female can now participate on girls teams ....
Ah, no. I don't think that the phrase "sex-segregated activities" means interschool women's sports. Intramural, perhaps. But not competitive athletics in the standard inter-school way that we're all thinking about. We're not going to have Fred-become-Fredrika running on the women's crosscountry team at Central HS.
I could be wrong about that, but I just can't believe that the Federal Government could be that stupid.
Yes, the Federal Government can be that stupid. Believe it.