I am going with leeches.
Thoughts?
What is the nastiest creature in the animal kingdom?
Non-Running
Other
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
-
Chuck Norris
-
Tie between goblin sharks and angler fish.
-
camel spider
-
If we're talking just mammals, then I would have to go with hyenas. They hang out in packs, steal prey and have been known to eat other mammals alive bit by bit. I always root against them when I see them in nature shows.
-
Honey Badger. They hate trolls.
-
Homo sapien.
-
1) Rats, mice, roaches, bedbugs, lice
2) Opossums, raccoons, pigeons
Hyenas, badgers, etc might be mean SOB's, but they won't try and live alongside you in your house. -
I don't know which kind but it has to be a snake. Hate those things.
-
vermin wrote:
1) Rats, mice, roaches, bedbugs, lice
2) Opossums, raccoons, pigeons
Hyenas, badgers, etc might be mean SOB's, but they won't try and live alongside you in your house.
Raccoons?!? WTF R U Talking about?
Raccoons are about the coolest dudes around. They even have that little Zoro mask to prove it. -
Man
-
Cro-Magnon wrote:
Homo sapien.
Correct, given that homo sapiens are solely responsible for the 6th mass extinction:
http://www.amazon.com/Sixth-Extinction-Unnatural-History/dp/1250062187/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1459966927&sr=8-1&keywords=the+6th+extinction -
foo wrote:
Cro-Magnon wrote:
Homo sapien.
Correct, given that homo sapiens are solely responsible for the 6th mass extinction:
http://www.amazon.com/Sixth-Extinction-Unnatural-History/dp/1250062187/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1459966927&sr=8-1&keywords=the+6th+extinction
So many tears :(
Life is nasty. How do you tree huggers legitimately determine whether ebola is worse than rats who are cleeeeeearly worse than house cats? Please lay out your own personal arbitrary criteria.
I have faith in our own disgusting race to navigate and continue to prosper for a very long time. Couldn't care less about the rest... just like all other species.
(Besides the obviously vilified candidates proposed in this thread, my vote goes to hyena. Something unsettling about them.) -
Mosquitoes are the answer. F^*k them to hell. Bats can find another source of food.
-
doot doot wrote:
So many tears :(
Life is nasty. How do you tree huggers legitimately determine whether ebola is worse than rats who are cleeeeeearly worse than house cats? Please lay out your own personal arbitrary criteria.
I have faith in our own disgusting race to navigate and continue to prosper for a very long time. Couldn't care less about the rest... just like all other species.
(Besides the obviously vilified candidates proposed in this thread, my vote goes to hyena. Something unsettling about them.)
So, your personal arbitrary criteria is "something unsettling"? -
Wtfunny wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Wonderful News wrote:
Homo entitlementus - the liberal
How is that different from my OP?
;-)
Well, leeches don't kill their prey. They consume a little, (generally) cause no real harm to the host, and then go one their way fat and happy. Does that seem "nasty" to you?
What would be nasty in my book is any creature that drowns the entire planet and causes the greatest mass ecocide in the history of the known and even unknown universe.
Got it. You love leeches (and presumably mosquitos) more than Jesus. Move along. -
doot doot wrote:
foo wrote:
Cro-Magnon wrote:
Homo sapien.
Correct, given that homo sapiens are solely responsible for the 6th mass extinction:
http://www.amazon.com/Sixth-Extinction-Unnatural-History/dp/1250062187/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1459966927&sr=8-1&keywords=the+6th+extinction
So many tears :(
Life is nasty. How do you tree huggers legitimately determine whether ebola is worse than rats who are cleeeeeearly worse than house cats? Please lay out your own personal arbitrary criteria.
I have faith in our own disgusting race to navigate and continue to prosper for a very long time. Couldn't care less about the rest... just like all other species.
(Besides the obviously vilified candidates proposed in this thread, my vote goes to hyena. Something unsettling about them.)
So, you're saying that you are proud to have the same level of consciousness and concern for others as your average protozoan? I'm impressed by your self-awareness. -
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Wtfunny wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Wonderful News wrote:
Homo entitlementus - the liberal
How is that different from my OP?
;-)
Well, leeches don't kill their prey. They consume a little, (generally) cause no real harm to the host, and then go one their way fat and happy. Does that seem "nasty" to you?
What would be nasty in my book is any creature that drowns the entire planet and causes the greatest mass ecocide in the history of the known and even unknown universe.
Got it. You love leeches (and presumably mosquitos) more than Jesus. Move along.
Got it. You think Jesus is responsible for humanity's polluting of the planet. Move along.
mmm... huh? -
All animals are worthless. But it's nice to be on top.
If I had to pick one to like the least (indulging OP's question) I go with hyena. Mostly because dogs are nice... but hyena is like a nightmare dog.
I simply don't feel overly sentimental about the non-hegemon species like the environmentalists do. -
Many of the parasitic worms would compete for that title. The WHO is trying to eradicate the Guinea worm, which grows under the skin and then bursts through it like Alien.
