Yeah, I can't wait for the Olympics to institute racial equality in the sprints.
2 lanes for Asians
1 lane for middle easterns
1 lane for Latins
2 lanes for white people
1 lane for black people
1 at large spot
Bring Back the 880 wrote:
He was wrong to react with the initial tweets, but his point about diversity was accurate.
Ethnicity is a social construct, no need to
have an accounting of the ethnic make-up of sponsored running teams or companies, for that matter.
Does no one understand what is going in this twitter war?
Fleshman insulted the AAC. Athlete's Advsory Committee. She says it is inactive, not doing anything.
The leadership of the AAC is black - Phillips is chair, Porter VP, McCloud Sec'y, and one other black person. There are two whites.
So Phillips thought Fleshman's criticism of the AAC was race based. As many blacks think the criticism of USATF (led by African Americans hightower and now Siegel) is race based.
Many black people think that the battles at USATF are basically a race war.
Fleshman may not have meant anything racial, but Phillips has a thin skin and thought it was. He thought this was yet another race based insult of USATF based on white people saying black poeple are incompetent.
Why don't you all see this?
agip wrote:
Does no one understand what is going in this twitter war?
Fleshman insulted the AAC. Athlete's Advsory Committee. She says it is inactive, not doing anything.
The leadership of the AAC is black - Phillips is chair, Porter VP, McCloud Sec'y, and one other black person. There are two whites.
So Phillips thought Fleshman's criticism of the AAC was race based. As many blacks think the criticism of USATF (led by African Americans hightower and now Siegel) is race based.
Many black people think that the battles at USATF are basically a race war.
Fleshman may not have meant anything racial, but Phillips has a thin skin and thought it was. He thought this was yet another race based insult of USATF based on white people saying black poeple are incompetent.
Why don't you all see this?
Also note the timing. The tweet came shortly after disturbingly racist emails sent to USATF were released.
bigtool05 wrote:
agip wrote:
Does no one understand what is going in this twitter war?
Fleshman insulted the AAC. Athlete's Advsory Committee. She says it is inactive, not doing anything.
The leadership of the AAC is black - Phillips is chair, Porter VP, McCloud Sec'y, and one other black person. There are two whites.
So Phillips thought Fleshman's criticism of the AAC was race based. As many blacks think the criticism of USATF (led by African Americans hightower and now Siegel) is race based.
Many black people think that the battles at USATF are basically a race war.
Fleshman may not have meant anything racial, but Phillips has a thin skin and thought it was. He thought this was yet another race based insult of USATF based on white people saying black poeple are incompetent.
Why don't you all see this?
We do, we just think that's really dumb
It's not a race issue. It;s Nike. When Masbach and Logan was CEO, USATF was out of control, and it's the same with Siegal/Hightower.
What are you 75?
Post the link
Urine idiot wrote:
Yeah, I can't wait for the Olympics to institute racial equality in the sprints.
2 lanes for Asians
1 lane for middle easterns
1 lane for Latins
2 lanes for white people
1 lane for black people
1 at large spot
Bring Back the 880 wrote:
He was wrong to react with the initial tweets, but his point about diversity was accurate.
Lauren and Nick are ridiculous racist...it's obvious.
agip wrote:
Does no one understand what is going in this twitter war?
Fleshman insulted the AAC. Athlete's Advsory Committee. She says it is inactive, not doing anything.
The leadership of the AAC is black - Phillips is chair, Porter VP, McCloud Sec'y, and one other black person. There are two whites.
So Phillips thought Fleshman's criticism of the AAC was race based. As many blacks think the criticism of USATF (led by African Americans hightower and now Siegel) is race based.
Many black people think that the battles at USATF are basically a race war.
Fleshman may not have meant anything racial, but Phillips has a thin skin and thought it was. He thought this was yet another race based insult of USATF based on white people saying black poeple are incompetent.
Why don't you all see this?
last time i checked your religious orientation doesn't have anything to do with the colour of your skin
agip wrote:
Does no one understand what is going in this twitter war?
Fleshman insulted the AAC. Athlete's Advsory Committee. She says it is inactive, not doing anything.
The leadership of the AAC is black - Phillips is chair, Porter VP, McCloud Sec'y, and one other black person. There are two whites.
So Phillips thought Fleshman's criticism of the AAC was race based. As many blacks think the criticism of USATF (led by African Americans hightower and now Siegel) is race based.
Many black people think that the battles at USATF are basically a race war.
Fleshman may not have meant anything racial, but Phillips has a thin skin and thought it was. He thought this was yet another race based insult of USATF based on white people saying black poeple are incompetent.
Why don't you all see this?
The "at large" spot will be the transgender spot, just to keep the SJW from rioting.
agip wrote:
Many black people think that the battles at USATF are basically a race war.
The perfect scam: If the governing body DOESN'T have a disproportionate composition of a certain ethnic group, they will claim discrimination; if they ARE disproportionately of that ethnicity, and are criticized, racism again! So stack them in place, do not EVER criticize them or you get the 2016 version of the Scarlet Letter, which is an "R".
Solid input from LRC's minority readership here.
Racial huffing and puffing aside, can we address the actual content of Fleshman's tweet? We're now more than three months into an olympic year (with the event itself just four months away), and the committee charged with advising and representing the athletes hasn't had any communication with said athletes? I'm not a professional runner, so I don't have any idea about how frequent or helpful AAC correspondence typically is, but, on it's face, it sure sounds like someone might be dropping the ball here.
[quote]Victorious88 wrote:
The original comment from Lauren seemed innocent enough,
What was the original comment?
Why label it without posting it?
That is some real BS
Al Pilker wrote:
fje9 wrote:
Are So wrote:
Fleshman is barely a part of this thing. It's mainly Phillips saying Symmonds looks out for his own interests and that Brooks is not a paragon of diversity.
Actually it looks like it started with a reply from Phillips to Fleshman:
â€"@laurenfleshman
Pro track and field athletes, have any of you received any emails from the AAC in 2016? @usatf_AAC"
Then:
@Dwightdagreat
Wow really, I guess black people are incompetent these days Lauren
then:
@laurenfleshman
excuse me Dwight, but that has literally nothing to do with my comment. That's completely inappropriate
then:
@Dwightdagreat
As is your tweet Lauren! No class!
I could be missing something but that looks like how it started to me.
That's all I can see as well. How could Dwight possibly find that as the best response to such a tweet by Lauren? This blows my mind. How is he the chair of the AAC with the leadership he is demonstrating with a tweet like that?
