grow some wrote:
sdfggd wrote:Are the drugs he needs really that cheap?
None of the accusers have addressed the question of which drugs he would be on.
Are anabolics going to address some limiting factor in 800 performance for a 165-pound 45.xx man? No. Think a little bit. Probably harmful if anything.
EPO? Don't be stupid.
So, what drug then? Vaguely throwing out the names of various peptides with no knowledge of their function is not an answer.
I understand your criticism, but there is a difference between the argument "he is suspicious" and "he is doping". A simplification, but lets start there. Skepticism, the "he is suspicious" standpoint, acknowledges an incomplete set of facts as incomplete, while the second conclusion needs more positive evidence. I am suspicious. We could see what he'd been up to before 1:48 and then before 1:43 and it would make sense. Or, maybe would see that his training at Adams St. was as rigorous as what he's doing now, in which case the question would still remain: "What changed, if not the training?" It could be that the training is so intense now that it begs the question "how can any clean athlete handle that?"
I don't think everyone is doping. I think everyone could be doping. I think its stupid to start with a base assumption that any given athlete couldn't be doping. Boris's case has fewer reedming qualities, and more suspicious qualities. Again, if you don't think the big performance jump is suspicious, fine. I do. If you don't think its important to question how he made that jump, well, you should.
[And I do want to address your question: Drugs aren't like video game power ups. Where you take testosterone to boost PWR, or EPO to boost STM. All drugs help everything to some degree. Cyclists took amphetamines, cocaine and anabolics to peform in 3 week tours. Short sprinters have been caught with EPO. Lance Armstrong detailed a part of his career when he was low-octane (not blood boosting but everything else) and won the World Championships (a 260km race), and the other part of his career high octane where he won TdFs. You can see the legacy of Soviet doping still among the top-performances on the women's side, in spite of the introduction of EPO since then. I don't need to name x drug to explain x' and then y drug to explain y'performance because that's not the way it works. An athlete doping to improve from 1:48 to 1:43 could be on anything.]