Two AMAZING articles on Carl Lewis - Carl Lewis thinks Coe should (temporarily) step down and says lj is 'pathetic'

Mr. Lewis, like most people, has the flawed thinking that the athletes today must be superior to the athletes of years ago.

I find it rich that Carl of all people is talking about cleaning up the sport.

---

Gina wrote:

Mr. Lewis, like most people, has the flawed thinking that the athletes today must be superior to the athletes of years ago.

---

So he's saying that the long jump is the cleanest T&F event right now? Seems like all the jumps have a low rate of convictions compared to the sprints.

---

Basilisk wrote:

So he's saying that the long jump is the cleanest T&F event right now? Seems like all the jumps have a low rate of convictions compared to the sprints.

---

---

rojo wrote:

---

Carl Lewis said:

“I think Seb Coe is smart enough, he’s a great guy who can do this,â€

---

---

A drugs cheat telling us how to deal with drugs, huh?

Well at least Rutherford did not have to have a positive for a PED covered up or get fitted with braces on perfect teeth in his mid twenties

He also does not know what the hell he is talking about. Top spinters no longer do the long jump which is why the distances are lower. Its nothing to do with coaching. He wss about .4 faster than Rutherford - that is the main reason he jumped .5 further.

Lastly on jumping, who is he coaching. What is he doing about the state of American jumping other than talking about it.

'If he was willing to step aside, and let someone independent come in and really clean this up, he’d be the perfect guy to come back in and run it.â€'

What complete nonsense. If he has lost credibility how can he come back.

He is just the king of BS but its not even good BS

---

ukathleticscoach wrote:

Well at least Rutherford did not have to have a positive for a PED covered up or get fitted with braces on perfect teeth in his mid twenties

He also does not know what the hell he is talking about. Top spinters no longer do the long jump which is why the distances are lower. Its nothing to do with coaching. He wss about .4 faster than Rutherford - that is the main reason he jumped .5 further.

Lastly on jumping, who is he coaching. What is he doing about the state of American jumping other than talking about it.

'If he was willing to step aside, and let someone independent come in and really clean this up, he’d be the perfect guy to come back in and run it.â€'

What complete nonsense. If he has lost credibility how can he come back.

He is just the king of BS but its not even good BS

---

How do you - and particularly you - even post your post without mentioning that Lewis's positive tests were covered up and that he is in possession of gold medals he should have returned?

You need to talk with Wade Exum.

Lewis was always a better singer than jumper. He needs to get back in the studio.

The long jump does suck and I'm not sure why. In the 2012 trials, Ashton Eaton jumped farther in the decathlon than anybody in the open long jump. Drugs or no drugs you'd expect guys to be jumping farther today than Jesse Owens did.

Pure gold:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kU9XwcOIfI

---

break it up wrote:

Lewis was always a better singer than jumper. He needs to get back in the studio.

---

---

elephino wrote:

The long jump does suck and I'm not sure why. In the 2012 trials, Ashton Eaton jumped farther in the decathlon than anybody in the open long jump. Drugs or no drugs you'd expect guys to be jumping farther today than Jesse Owens did.

---

Any talk of Carl LEwis should come with "Drug cheat Carl Lewis"

---

Lewis: 'Who cares I failed drug test?'

Carl Lewis has broken his silence on allegations that he was the beneficiary of a drugs cover-up, admitting he had tested positive for banned substances but claiming he was just one of "hundreds" of American athletes who were allowed to escape bans.

"There were hundreds of people getting off," he said. "Everyone was treated the same."

Lewis has now acknowledged that he failed three tests during the 1988 US Olympic trials, which under international rules at the time should have prevented him from competing in the Seoul games two months later.

The admission is a further embarrassment for the United States Olympic Committee, which had initially denied claims that 114 positive tests between 1988 and 2000 were covered up. It will add weight to calls by leading anti-doping officials and top athletes for an independent inquiry into the US's record on drug issues.

Last week Dr Wade Exum alleged that a ban imposed on Lewis after positive tests for three stimulants had been overturned by the USOC when the athlete said he had ingested them mistakenly in a herbal supplement.

Lewis received only a warning after officials ruled that his positive tests were due to "inadvertent" use. Some scientists believe the substances could have been a masking agent for more serious drugs, such as anabolic steroids.

"The climate was different then," said Lewis. "Over the years a lot of people will sit around and debate that [the drug] does something. There really is no pure evidence to show that it does something. It does nothing."

Lewis, who was arrested in Los Angeles on Monday for suspected drink-driving which friends say was the result of depression over Exum's revelations, won the 100 metres gold medal in the 1988 Seoul Olympics after Canada's Ben Johnson was stripped of the title when he tested positive for a steroid.

Lewis also won the long jump and finished second in the 200m behind his training partner Joe DeLoach, also named by Exum as having escaped a ban.

Johnson has now demanded that Lewis be stripped of his medals from Seoul, although the International Olympic Committee has no plans to review the situation because it has a statute of limitation set at three years.

"Do you expect him to say anything different?" said Lewis. "I mean we're talking about Ben Johnson. Come on. Let's be realistic."

Lewis, 41, said he was not concerned about the uproar around the world caused by the revelations. "It's ridiculous. Who cares?" he said. "I did 18 years of track and field and I've been retired five years, and they're still talking about me, so I guess I still have it."

Moscow is to launch its bid for the 2012 Olympic Games by staging the richest meeting in athletics history, offering a $1m (£630,000) purse to anyone who breaks the 100m world record.

Britain's Dwain Chambers will join the United States' world record holder Tim Montgomery and the Olympic and world champion Maurice Greene in an event in which the winner is guaranteed $500,000, nearly 10 times what the gold medallist in the world championships in Paris will earn. Nine other events, including the triple jump in which Jonathan Edwards is expected to compete, will split a prize purse of $3.5m.

Organisers are predicting a sell-out crowd of 85,000 at the meeting on September 20 in the Luzhniki Stadium, the arena for the 1980 Olympics and the centrepiece of Moscow's bid for the 2012 games, for which its rivals are expected to include London.

The event is being staged with the assistance of Stellar, the British-based management company headed by the former European 200m champion John Regis. "Moscow wants to show it can put on the best meeting in the world to help promote their Olympic bid," said Stellar's Mark Brodie. "It's going to be spectacular."

---

I don't think you have to choose the words Lewis did use, but it's absolutely true what he is saying regarding the long jump. It's definitely (one of) the worst events in athletics for many years now. It's not a critic from me at all, it's just a fact. What ever the reasons might be.

It's just the most "easy" event of them all, and so I think the interest in doing it is not comparable to - say - the pole vault (much more "fun" character).

Athletes are often in trouble to beat the 8m, a mark which Jesse Owens has bettered over 80 years ago. Some decathletes are bettering that mark (even in a decathlon). Ashton Eaton has jumped 8.23m.
No doubt, it's one of the worst events in athletics for many years now - for what ever reason.
The explanation: "Lewis was doping and the current athletes are clean" - well, if just everything could be that easy...

Here is a third article where Lewis talks about cleaing up the sport:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/columnist/nancy-armour/2016/03/08/armour-olympic-champion-carl-lewis-calls-out-track/81506466/

“It’s not an emotional issue, it’s a business issue. Do you want your sport clean for young people coming up? Do you want it to be fair?

“So if someone says (they don’t trust track), it’s our job to change their thinking.â€

To eveyone talking about Lewis positives. A few thoughts.

1) To act like Williams wasn't an amazing jumper is absurd. He jumped 8.62 - longer than Rutherfor'ds pb - at age 19.

2) As for Lewis testing positive back in day,do we even know how much of the stuff was in his syst?. Back then it was illegal to even take sudafed. Now it's not.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2003/apr/18/athletics.duncanmackay

"Lewis, in fact, tested positive three times for small amounts of banned stimulants: pseudoephedrine, ephedrine and phenylpropanolamine. Under international rules at the time all three athletes should have been suspended for three months."

Now you can have that stuff in your system as outlined below.

**** Epinephrine (adrenaline): Not prohibited in local administration e.g. nasal, ophthalmologic, or co-administration with local anaesthetic agents.

***** Pseudoephedrine: Prohibited when its concentration in urine is greater than 150 micrograms per milliliter


3) I'm not condoning drug usage just dealing in facts.

rojo, ephedrine and epinephrine are two different things. Ephidrine is definitely banned.

LOL at a drug-related article with a note on Greene, Chambers and Montgomery in an upcoming showdown.