LAPD officer kept knife found buried on OJ Simpsons estate

Simpson cannot be tried again for murder even if he did it, and the knife is the murder weapon. The US justice system ... what a joke.

Why would he bring it home and bury it in his yard where they would be sure to look? Go bury it in the woods or something, that's the smart thing to do.

So back in 1994 they never ran a metal detector over OJ's place looking for the knife??????

Bad Wigins wrote:

Why would he bring it home and bury it in his yard? ..... that's the smart thing to do.

I think you just answered your own question.

Bad Wigins wrote:

Why would he bring it home and bury it in his yard where they would be sure to look? Go bury it in the woods or something, that's the smart thing to do.

Why the fake beard, cash, passport, and Ford Bronco???

Change @ Park wrote:

Bad Wigins wrote:

Why would he bring it home and bury it in his yard where they would be sure to look? Go bury it in the woods or something, that's the smart thing to do.

Why the fake beard, cash, passport, and Ford Bronco???

All that stuff was so OJ could go undercover in his Search for the Real Killers.

runnar wrote:

Change @ Park wrote:

Why the fake beard, cash, passport, and Ford Bronco???

All that stuff was so OJ could go undercover in his Search for the Real Killers.

Odd how everyone knows OJ did it.

Corrupt Incompetent Cops wrote:

http://m.tmz.com/#article/2016/03/04/oj-simpson-knife-found-murders-nicole-brown/

Finally turns it over after attempting to have it framed for display.

Preposterous fake. Every construction worker carries a Buck knife and someone could have dropped theirs or it was planted last week.

Do you really think this is a coincidence (?) given the renewed interest in the case due to the TV serial?

This guy just wants to make a quick buck selling the Buck knife. (See what I did there?).

Manbearpig wrote:

So back in 1994 they never ran a metal detector over OJ's place looking for the knife??????

This ^^^

I thought I remembered that they were almost completely decapitated, would be kinda hard to do with a folding buck knife.

LOL. Let it go already white people. You got him on the civil suit. Now you want to plant evidence? White justice for you.

Bad Wigins wrote:

Why would he bring it home and bury it in his yard where they would be sure to look? Go bury it in the woods or something, that's the smart thing to do.

You mean that someone who was being watched 24-7 would be able to casually go to "the woods" and bury a murder weapon? You're an idiot.

The knife disappeared in the duffle bag that Mr. Simpson took to the airport. The duffle bag disappeared at the airport. The reasoning was that he simply tossed the bag with the knife into a trash can at the airport.

The GIP wrote:

runnar wrote:

All that stuff was so OJ could go undercover in his Search for the Real Killers.

Odd how everyone knows OJ did it.

OJ confessed to Rosie Grier on a visit to OJ in jail. Grier was a personal friend as well as a minister. OJ's legal team argued that conversations between inmates and clergy are protected under state law. So, OJ got away more than once.

Kant Bee Tryed wrote:

Simpson cannot be tried again for murder even if he did it, and the knife is the murder weapon. The US justice system ... what a joke.

Actually the 5th amendment is one of the better ones for protecting civil liberties and remains relevant centuries after it was written.

Actually, Simpson confessed to a friend, Grier, who was not acting as a minister when he visited OJ in jail.

Also, the prosecution made a major blunder. When OJ "famously" tried on the gloves that "didn't" fit, he had to wear latex gloves to protect the evidence. Now, take a pair of your own form fitting gloves, like the ones OJ tried on, put on latex gloves, and tried to put the gloves on. You can't because the the latex gloves have no body oils and the extremely friction between rubber and gloves prevents you from putting the on.

Con-fession wrote:

Actually, Simpson confessed to a friend, Grier, who was not acting as a minister when he visited OJ in jail.

Also, the prosecution made a major blunder. When OJ "famously" tried on the gloves that "didn't" fit, he had to wear latex gloves to protect the evidence. Now, take a pair of your own form fitting gloves, like the ones OJ tried on, put on latex gloves, and tried to put the gloves on. You can't because the the latex gloves have no body oils and the extremely friction between rubber and gloves prevents you from putting the on.

No, the prosecution's biggest blunder was their refusal to use a jury consultant. Marcia Clark stacked the jury with black women who were sympahetic to OJ. Yuuuge mistake. In a mock trial leading up to the actual trial, Clark was extremely disliked by her handpicked mock jury.

She was easy to dislike.

She looks completely different today.

In fact, if there was not a name under her photo a person would not even guess that it was her.

The prosecutions biggest mistake IMO was incorrectly framing the story portraying OJ as a jealous ex husband. If they had given the jury the actual motive, Nicole going after OJ's money by attempting to have their prenup voided - and the nasty truth behind the details of that, then OJ probably doesn't get acquitted. Maybe he still does though, hard to get around an investigating detective answering the question "Did you falsify any reports or fabricate any evidence in this investigation" with "I'd like to invoke my 5th amendment rights...."

Trying to puff up ratings for the OJ miniseries.