engaging a madman wrote:
Uhhff wrote:How is that relevant?
It will; help us understand how and why you selected it.
Again, how is that relevant?
engaging a madman wrote:
Uhhff wrote:How is that relevant?
It will; help us understand how and why you selected it.
Again, how is that relevant?
Uhhff wrote:
engaging a madman wrote:It will; help us understand how and why you selected it.
Again, how is that relevant?
Should be fairly easy to get. It will help you prove your point. Don't you want to do that?
engaging a madman wrote:
Should be fairly easy to get. It will help you prove your point. Don't you want to do that?
Can we for once have a thread that isn't hijacked by one of your meltdowns?
SMJO_the_real_1 wrote:
engaging a madman wrote:Should be fairly easy to get. It will help you prove your point. Don't you want to do that?
Can we for once have a thread that isn't hijacked by one of your meltdowns?
you mad bro?
I was at that talk. He said renaud runs 10m/s with the pole, not 10.66. He also specifically said that what made the remarkable was that he couldn't break 11 in the open 11 and had a flying top end speed with no pole of about 10.5m/s, so he was very efficient with the pole. The top end speed you reported would add up to a much faster open 100 than Renaud has run. And renaud has run the open 100 in multiple races over the past 4 years, so we have a very good idea of what he is (and is not) capable of. He's an 11 flat 100m runner, not faster. The times you are misremembering from summit would add up to more like a 10.7 open 100, which he hasn't come close to.
These numbers add up. Comparing them to myself, my flying top end speed is about 10.2m/s. I have run 11.5 in the open 100, so it is about proportional to renaud's times. I can only do about 8.6m/s at takeoff though at the end of a season, a much lower percentage of my max speed compared to him.
Regarding Ashton, your numbers are off. He most definitely can run faster at his top end than you claim. However my point is that he doesn't hit those speeds on the runway with a pole. I don't think he could even with practice.
Regarding Bubka's reported 10 flat speed, he was on the nationals team on the 4x100 at two European championships. He wasn't making that squad with 11 flat speed, that's for sure, he was certainly much faster than that. Despite having much better top end speed than renaud, he had roughly the same runway speed. We have to just believe Petrov when he says he did video analysis with practice jumps to get that 10m/s speed at takeoff, but it does fit with attempts to approximate a runway speed from competition video.
The free takeoff is debatable if it adds to the jump. I agree with you that it does, but many would argue that it doesnt. Renaud has done just fine without it, so maybe it helps some athletes and not others.
So back to ashton. The point is he is much like bubka in terms of speed and athletic prowess and likely even a step up. But he doesn't hit the same speeds with the pole as Bubka and renaud. Nor does he have their gymnastic ability. I see him being a potential high 18, low 19 foot. Damned good, yes. World record contender, I doubt it.
If you think ashton could be the world's best vaulter, why not trey hardee? He is almost as fast in the open 100 as ashton and a full .7s faster in the open 100 than renaud. He has also been vaulting for almost 14 years. He went to college on a vaulting scholarship.
The point is, what makes renaud a special vaulter isn't speed. He has just enough speed to capitalize on all the other things that make him incredible. Bubka's vastly superior speed didn't make him better than renaud. Likewise, unless ashton is a natural vaulter to rival renaud and we just haven't seen it yet, his extra speed potential isn't going to help him.
Renaud has also been kind enough to have done the Dec as a senior as well as did lj, hurdles, and the 100 many times in college. So again we have more metrics to compare. While he is decent all the lj and hurdles, he is not at the same level as ashton of course. Again this adds weight to the idea that just because ashton is a ridiculously fast and powerful athlete, it won't make him a better vaulter than Renaud. If it did, he'd already be renaud's match just on the limited training he has done, because he is that much better than Renaud in these events.
The other Dec events aren't worth comparing because renaud didn't practice those for 8+ years.
I was at the talk as well, I actually had Phillipe copy his powerpoint slides and training videos onto a memory stick for me. I just looked it over again and he specifically has a table on one of his slides that lists 10.66 m/s as a speed Renaud has hit during a pole vault jump. He has some other speeds listed between 10.66 and 10 m/s as well, showing that it wasn't a fluke. No where in this presentation did he talk about Renaud's 100m times or list any times on any of his slides for him. Where we at the same presentation? If Renaud has run some autotimed 100s in the last 5 years, they should be on the internet somewhere, please post a link to them if you have the data. I do know he runs some relays for his club team in France once in a while. I'd say any times before 2010 are pretty meaningless since he realistically wasn't nearly as fast before then than he has been since 2012.
You are right about one thing and that is speed isn't everything in the vault. I've seen high school boys who had legit 11 second flat PRs in the 100m that were only vaulting 13'. It takes a special kind of person to want to actually hit the box at top speed.
Let's be honest if Eaton thought he could be a great pole vaulter he probably would have focused on that instead of the 400 hurdles. The fact that he chose to focus on the 400 hurdles on his "off" years tell us everything that we need to know regarding this thread.
Google his name and 100m....
Here are two results on his diamond league profile:
11.04 mid season 2011, 11.38 end of season 2013
http://www.diamondleague.com/athletes/14185853.htmlI don't believe that Renaud has 10.66m/s speed even without the pole. That maximum speed would translate to about a 10.4 open 100m time if the runner has a great start, I have found this chart to be fairly accurate (30m fly to 100m time):
http://speedendurance.com/2011/12/16/30-meter-sprint-times-revisited/I think it is safe to assume that Renaud is not a fantastic starter, since he doesn't focus mainly on that. Still if 10.66m/s is to believed even without the pole as his max speed, he should be way under 11 for his 100m time. My suspicion is that Phillipe didn't measure very scientifically. Perhaps his methods are consistent, so still useful from the perspective of tracking progress over a season, but if I don't believe renaud is quite that fast without the pole, I can't believe he is that fast with the pole.
I appreciated the talk, but I would take the numbers with a grain of salt. What I took away from it was more of a feeling of how he trained. Lot's of general fitness, actual serious hurdles work (which surprised me), lots of body awareness, and of course lots of jumping.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!