VAcoach wrote:
By the numbers wrote:No one wins NCAA XC off of 50 miles a week.
If he doesn't hit a consistent 70-80 mpw before the start of next year's XC season then the best he can hope to be is a "somewhere in the top 10" guy, not a legit contender for the win.
This type of stuff makes me laugh, as if there is some magic number out there. I believe in high mileage and challenging the aerobic system, but for knight, 50mpw is challenging this aerobic system. You don't think Wilson Kipsang could beat cheserek off 50mpw? Caleb Ndiku? Whether or not knight has the genetic ceiling of a Kipsang or Ndiku is a separate question, but mileage is a highly individualized thing. I am sure that knight will progress into the higher mileage and progress in his performance. The question is whether 50mpw knight can beat 100mpw cheserek. The kid is young enough who knows, but if he loses, it won't be because he didn't run enough mileage.
Great smart post. NCAA Lagat could have destroyed Cheserek or Rupp on 50 mpw, for example.