It looks like a trick question. A performance enhancing drug can only be called performance enhancing if it is effectively performance enhancing. Of course, I don't doubt what is essentially phrased as a tautology.But don't mistake me for J.R., or wellnow (in any of his alter egos). If you are out of balance, and a drug helps strengthen a weakness, then it can improve performance. If you are a women, and take male hormones, that increase your strength, this can help you outperform other women. Training can temporarily put you "off balance", and some drugs can restore balance more quickly, allowing a higher volume of training (in the short term).For your information, I don't always doubt the efficacy of EPO. There are studies which measure the benefits of EPO, and for the "well-trained" subjects in the study, for the short duration the study is performed, EPO is undeniably and measurably effective. (One reason is that their training is not controlled for in the study).Maybe a different way to express my "faith" more clearly. For running events, I doubt that EPO can take you to a level of performance that couldn't potentially be obtained without it. The 11:00 runner who improves in 6 weeks to 10:30, with EPO, can also be trained without EPO to run 10:30. Train them to run 10:30 first, then the study will show smaller results. EPO can help the weak-minded, and can help the poorly trained. It might get you somewhere faster, but it cannot take you beyond your personal potential. Lombard could have achieved the same times, if he had possessed the right mentality, and had found the right coach with the right balance of training. For the same reason, EPO won't work for the strong minded, who are already well trained to their potential.Whether these things are true or not, I'm also victim to the same lack of ability to prove my ideas, but only able to provide arguments that I think support it. But I think this explains better why Americans, and Europeans, and Australians, and Russians could not manage to budge their own national or area records during the "EPO era", despite widespread use in cycling and lack of a test to detect it, and why they were unable to respond to the new challenge of East Africans, despite the availability of the "most powerful endurance drug ever created".
gurble wrote:
Do you dispute the efficacy of all performance enhancing drugs or just EPO?