KeepingUpWithTheConservatives wrote:
Coach Foo wrote:Surviving and procreating isn't necessarily a high standard to set. Pretty low hanging fruit.
Survival and procreation are no longer our prime achievements as a species.
We're the only highly sentient creatures on this planet. Some people forget to act like it :)
Utter nonsense. Sentience is a religious theory. According to science, we're a species like any other. We just happened to evolve with our brains instead of other physical attributes. In the scheme of the universe no one's accomplishment as a human is any better or worse than my pitbulls accomplishment of catching a tennis ball on the fly.
Some people like to do crossfit and others like to run long distance. Neither is right or wrong, but crossfit on average is more productive from an evolutionary standpoint.
Now this thread just got interesting. I have a question for "keepingUpWith TheConservatives" If one rejects religion, and with it the religious theory of "sentience," does that person become a non-sentient person? Do they immediately become unaware of their decision...or what they were doing, or who they are? Of course this is a rhetorical question. The idea of a non-sentient person is an impossible contradiction. If you don't believe me, try to set aside your sentience, just for awhile. If sentience is a "religious theory," I guess religion can be thanked for making you a person, as opposed to just a thing. I, for one, am glad religion can tell me that I am more than just a thing, that I am a person too. If current scientific theory tells me I am just a thing, but my sentience is constantly testifying to myself that I am something more than just a thing, then the current prevailing hypothesis of science must be pretty far off the mark.