How much did Nike pay Diack to get 2021 Eugene World's

asdfdsfasdf wrote:Lying to federal investigators?

What was the lie and when did he lie to federal investigators? Making false statements to a federal investigator has a 5 year statute of limitations.

I'm not defending Armstrong, but he has always been very lawyered up and cagey. There may well have not been any federal criminal charges that could have been brought successfully.

Factual Evidence wrote:

Now that we are finally seeing the truth on how Qatar paid Diack $5mil cash to secure the 2019 World's how much did they have to pay him for 2021 in Eugene? Remember they didn't even do a bidding process and they rushed it through before Diack retired as President which means they must have offered substantial money to him.

Also very concerning that the new President is on the Nike payroll and has the ability to cover up positive drug tests for them. Could Coe be a puppet for Nike and help them get an advantage in the sport?

Go back to this article about the no-bid award of the Worlds Championships to Eugene. There had to be a payoff for this one. With Seb Coe, already on the Nike payroll, he becomes a "born" corrupt IAAF leader. He should step down before he ever takes control. This is a serious conflict of interests and his presence will only permanently metastasize the corrosive stench in the IAAF.

Perhaps Interpol will arrest Lananna, Capriotti and the rest of the Nike mafia?

Oh, wait. When it's something you don't agree with, it's not representative of a free market. Hahahaha!!!! Oh man I love idiots like you. Diack is your poster boy for unfettered capitalism. Honor him!!

Factual Evidence wrote:

When Diack made decisions based on which lined his personal pockets the best vs what is in the best interest of the sport/IAAF than it's not a free market. AKA giving 2019 World's to Qatar. Sport is dying and we're putting World XC in Uganda.... Wonder how much they paid to Diack have an event nobody is going to show up to?

Cons r failures wrote:

Who cares? I thought you nimrods were all about THE FREE MARKET.

Well,,,,,,, welcome to THE FREE MARKET

True. It's so bizarre that these nimrods don't even understand what they profess to support!

pop_pop!_v2.1.1 wrote:

Oh, wait. When it's something you don't agree with, it's not representative of a free market. Hahahaha!!!! Oh man I love idiots like you.

Diack is your poster boy for unfettered capitalism. Honor him!!

Factual Evidence wrote:

When Diack made decisions based on which lined his personal pockets the best vs what is in the best interest of the sport/IAAF than it's not a free market. AKA giving 2019 World's to Qatar. Sport is dying and we're putting World XC in Uganda.... Wonder how much they paid to Diack have an event nobody is going to show up to?

If a payoff was made....those guys are probably sweating it out.

implicated wrote:

If a payoff was made....those guys are probably sweating it out.

Not necessarily. As long as the transfer was made legally, there's no problem.

For example, Diack could charge someone at Nike for "consulting services." Paying a consultant isn't illegal. The mechanism probably isn't that simple, but you get the idea.

The big problem with this assumption is ADIDAS is the official IAAF sponsor. Why would NIKE pay to bring an ADIDAS meet to the USA?

RVGoddess wrote:

The big problem with this assumption is ADIDAS is the official IAAF sponsor. Why would NIKE pay to bring an ADIDAS meet to the USA?

Perhaps this is why:

Close to the Nike headquarters in Beaverton, the awarding of the 2021 championships was regarded by many in athletics as a potential sweetener for the American sportswear giant when they are strongly tipped to succeed adidas as the official sponsors of the world governing body. Signed in 2008, the current adidas deal runs out in 2019.

Whether the 2021 meet is an adidas meet depends on who the IAAF's official sponsor is after 2019. And, of course, unless something changes before the new sponsorship contract is signed, the head of the IAAF is already on Nike's payroll.

Cui bono? wrote:

RVGoddess wrote:

The big problem with this assumption is ADIDAS is the official IAAF sponsor. Why would NIKE pay to bring an ADIDAS meet to the USA?

Perhaps this is why:

Close to the Nike headquarters in Beaverton, the awarding of the 2021 championships was regarded by many in athletics as a potential sweetener for the American sportswear giant when they are strongly tipped to succeed adidas as the official sponsors of the world governing body. Signed in 2008, the current adidas deal runs out in 2019.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-3307540/Lamine-Diack-pocketed-1m-drug-bribes-say-French-prosecutors-son-implicated.html

THIS

Are you really trying to say that Seb Coe being paid by Nike may have an impact on who the official IAAF sponsor is after 2019. You guys are really drawing at straws now.

This thread is the exact reason Seb Coe can not get paid for Nike and be on the payroll of the IAAF. Tremendous conflict of interest.

The integrity of sport is under assault. And with Diack's son under investigation for soliciting a bribe of $5 million to take Worlds to Qatar of course other's are going to ask if something went down with Eugene. Can you blame them? If the World Cup went to XYZ withotu a bid people would question it, just because it is track and our own backyard doesn't mean people aren't going to question it. The Swedes who wanted to bid are livid over Eugene 2021.

I thought of question today. Did Seb recuse himself from the vote on Worlds 2021?

Now on the surface it was not a Nike bid, but Tracktown USA and Nike are synonymous. Presumably Seb would recuse himself from any vote dealing directly with Nike, but the question is did he recuse himself from this vote? Considering he won't give us his paid gig with Nike now despite how bad it looks, I seriously doubt he recused himself from the vote, but I thought of it this morning.

Wejo, you seem mainly focused on the Russian Federation angle of all this, and not on the head of IAAF Lamine Diack soliciting and receiving bribes for dumping positive drug tests. Shouldn't Lamine Diack's bribery get equal billing as the Russian Federation? He is dumping positive drug tests for pay.

Aren't your priorities somewhat skewered?

I think Wejo is correct to focus on the area where we have details on at the moment. There is more to come with Diack. I think that will go on for some time and it would be great if the press stayed on it, particularly as it relates to the stories from last year about the IAAF treatment of values. An investigation can start going into older communications and practices. This probably did not start just a few years ago and the practice may have been refined over time.

I think Coe needs to get as much transparency as possible ASAP. Before anyone says anything, I know there is a chance that he may be implicated but I am assuming he is not. If that is the case, he should:

1. Set up new ethical standards.

2. Disclose all past wrongdoings.

3. Provide all remaining test data to independent experts.

4, Offer t new elections and governance soon. If he wants to run for office again, he can answer for his handling of this event and what happened while he was VP.

Diack is out of power and was arrested and released on bail by the french authorities. If Diack was in power every headline would be "Diack has to go" and people would be equally pulling for his resignation and Russia's ban from competition. Since his egg has been fried all attention is on the Russians to get their punishment.

Terms of Reference.

Why is this all focussed on Russia? The terms of reference of this enquiry were very carefully constructed. Within the current political climate in the west Russia is a beautiful scapegoat....

Look!!! over there, tut, tut, tut!

Doping is rife. Cleanest dirty shirt.

Factual Evidence wrote:

Diack is out of power and was arrested and released on bail by the french authorities. If Diack was in power every headline would be "Diack has to go" and people would be equally pulling for his resignation and Russia's ban from competition. Since his egg has been fried all attention is on the Russians to get their punishment.

messi wrote:

Wejo, you seem mainly focused on the Russian Federation angle of all this, and not on the head of IAAF Lamine Diack soliciting and receiving bribes for dumping positive drug tests. Shouldn't Lamine Diack's bribery get equal billing as the Russian Federation? He is dumping positive drug tests for pay.

Aren't your priorities somewhat skewered?

Yeah, but Diack still has millions in Swiss banks I am assuming. Getting him out of office is not all that much justice at all.

Why isn't FBI all over IAAF the way they are all over FIFA?

Factual Evidence wrote:

Looks like I'm not the only one that realizes the awarding of World's to Eugene was done under unethical circumstances.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-3309624/Bjorn-Eriksson-labels-awarding-2021-World-Athletics-Championships-Oregon-highly-unethical-outrage-grows.html

No you are not. The Chicago Tribune's Phil Hersh also wonders if the bid is in jeopardy.

messi wrote:

Yeah, but Diack still has millions in Swiss banks I am assuming. Getting him out of office is not all that much justice at all.

Why isn't FBI all over IAAF the way they are all over FIFA?

You do realize Diack has been arrested in France and is facing bribery charges?

Not the FBI but french authorities and now interpol.

Frankly I think this is something that an investigative journalist should dig into. Two things we know, Diack accepts bribes and Nike will pay their way to further their brand. Add to that the fact that there was no bidding, and it seems very dubious at best.