While that may be the point, is this point justified? Do the ARD/Sunday Times experts have complete information? For example, following up with urine testing is something, not nothing, and this wouldn't be in a blood database. The IAAF adopted and used the blood passport. They use it the most. That is something.
No. No. No. No. You just keep making stuff up.
Cycling performs many more tests, blood and urine.
Following up with urine test at any time does nothing. Zero.
If someone fails a urine test then they've failed an IQ test.
My gift to you: Secret information about anti-doping more secret than Seppelt's data disclosure: https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/wada-2014-annual-report-en-rev.pdf