The experts did not say "99.9% chance of doping" or "explained by something other than doping". The experts aren't concerned by the 1/1000 chance, but the 1/1000000 chance.
And the experts did not say "Paula".
To the gills wrote:
On 3 separate occasions she registered blood values that, according to experts, had a 1/1000 chance of being explained by something other than doping. That's 99.9% chance of doping,
3 different times. The fact that she hasn't disputed, or explained this is pretty telling. I don't need to see the blood values because I wouldn't know how to read them. But if an expert says 99.9% on three different occasions and Paula goes silent on the matter, I'm okay rounding that up.