Radcliffe says she's not releasing blood values

The European wrote:

High fructose corn syrup

The KKK

Highest homocide rate in the developed world

Bread that tastes sweet

A nasty addiction to oil

Highest prison population in the world

The death penalty

No paid maternity leave

Dunkin donuts

Basically no functioning public transport system

Legal drinking age of 21

Deep dish pizza

Detroit

Budweiser

The Tea party

Having a World Series in a sport that the rest of world ignores

Nike Oregon Project

And the list goes on.....

We didn't start the fire...

Err..didn't Billy Joel start the fire?

I always saw Paula as someone who was willing to push any of the "grey" areas, so long as she wasn't technically "doping". That and her self righteous, accusatory attitude towards other athletes was pretty lame.

That said I would be VERY surprised if she was knowingly crossing the line. And I am shocked that she didn't have a good enough doctor to make sure she wasn't throwing up red flags.

For the record though doping wouldn't change my opinion of her one way or the other. To me all the grey area sh!t is just as lame.

One giant step for mankind ... one small step for an American.

Game.

Megan Fox.

Set.

Olivia Wilde.

Match.

EU runner wrote:

It seems that the BBC studio pundit for the distance events of the WCh will be Jo Pavey ...and not Paula.

Surprise?

Where does it say that?

Jo Pavey was in the studio in the UK with Michael Johnson and Daley Thompson.Radcliffe is in Bejing maybe she is just commentating.

H.I.P.S. wrote:

She asked the IAAF to conduct random blood and urine tests in the build up to Chicago? ....

This means absolutely nothing. Thanks to Seppelt we now know that the IAAF has been sweeping perhaps thousands of off-the-charts blood tests under the carpet over the the last 15 to 20 years. So what is the point of asking the IAAF to anaylze one's blood test data?- They are simply not a credible organization when it comes to these matters.

To add there was a 30 minute preview on BBC .Doping was talked about Pavey defended her decision to publish her blood data as a personal choice and was backed by Thompson who said he would have done the same.

Brits are not fit wrote:

summary:

head bobber says she would release her data to stop drug cheats

athletes are given opportunity to release their data

head bobber says she won't release her data

public reaction: hmmmmmm

Brit reaction: leave her alone

^ This!

Brits are not fit wrote:

1783 and 1812

Head to head 2 - 0.

-------------------------------------------

How do you win by being a traitor fighting your own countrymen. Plus it was on your land thousands of miles away

Socially you have Elizabeth Hurley and Posh. Not much else.

===================

Look like you only read you mom's old Hello magazine for a crafty wank

Enjoy your haggis and fish and chips and warm beer. Roll brittania roll.

=============================================

Thanks for the Big Mac

The head bobber won't release her data. Lanced.

We don't need the data for your best long distance runner, we've seen the paper with his testosterone meds to top up his thyroid and asthma doping

Who cares if she releases blood values or not? She hasn't done anything significant in years.

Radcliffe commentating on the marathon on the BBC.

It's sad to see how PED's have altered sports.

ijenns318 wrote:

Who cares if she releases blood values or not? She hasn't done anything significant in years.

Unless possessing the world record is significant to anyone.

drdvc wrote:

Radcliffe commentating on the marathon on the BBC.

Thank fvck for Eurosport, full coverage and no Radcliffe. If I had to listen to her it would be like having to listen to that Ashley Madison hypocrite Josh Duggar talk about family values. Pukesville.

wejo wrote:

5) I will tell Paula these things directly in Beijing. Her and Gary are always receptive when I speak with them.

Weldon,

I was wondering if you've had the chance to talk with Paula and Gary yet. Other than postings on this message board and a very brief rhetorical question in the Daily Mail ("If athletics really wants to beat its drug problems, why is Paula Radcliffe, an athlete who so many once looked up to, advising runners not to release their blood data?"), I've seen almost no follow-up or commentary from anyone on this subject.

There's no way she's going to talk to Wejo. Even if they're friends, he's a member of the media. She still hasn't answered the question of whether or not she's the British athlete with suspicious blood values and there's no way she's going to put herself in a position where she'll have to answer it or lie. The only interviews you'll see her in are BBC nonsense where the questions are agreed upon and she doesn't have to address the tough questions about her suspicious blood values.

On twitter she renewed her anti-doping campaign with a couple pro-Bolt tweets. There were a few people who commented asking about her blood values, but most of the comments were in agreement with her.

Unless you're British.

...blood doping cheats 2:15!!!!!