SI's Peter King's pace claims seem off

a lie or an exaggeration?

and does it really matter?

he hates the Redskins

He probably doesn't do big mileage, so he could be a speed guy at shorter distances that can't carry it to 13.1 miles.

"Now I have a resting heart rate of 62. I work out five times a week plus a long weekend run." -P. King in RW

No idea what "long" means to him, though.

This is a non-starter. First, it seems entirely reasonable for him to run that pace (I'm 200 lbs, old, and can run a 20 min 5k). Second, who cares?

Sorry 'who cares', but you too are exaggerating or lying.

If you weigh 200 pounds and are old you are not running a 20 minute 5k.

I have no idea why this thread was taken down. I love his MMQB column and definitely want this up. If a vice presidential candidate's running exploits are fair game, then so are Peter King's.

I got an email from a guy about King's college running experiences and am hoping to get permission to publish it.

Egun wrote:

Sorry 'who cares', but you too are exaggerating or lying.

If you weigh 200 pounds and are old you are not running a 20 minute 5k.

If 'who cares' is 60+, then no, probably not [unless he's Henry Rono].

If 'who cares' is, say, 50 - meh, could be.

I wouldn't put it past him to lie about his running pace, Peter King is a terrible human being: http://uproxx.com/ksk/2009/07/fun-with-klassic-peter-king-the-foul-ball-story/

rojo wrote:

I have no idea why this thread was taken down. I love his MMQB column and definitely want this up. If a vice presidential candidate's running exploits are fair game, then so are Peter King's.

I got an email from a guy about King's college running experiences and am hoping to get permission to publish it.

Taken down because your mods are out of control. Any interesting topic is removed, but the spam rolls on unabated.

dkny64 wrote:

Egun wrote:

Sorry 'who cares', but you too are exaggerating or lying.

If you weigh 200 pounds and are old you are not running a 20 minute 5k.

If 'who cares' is 60+, then no, probably not [unless he's Henry Rono].

If 'who cares' is, say, 50 - meh, could be.

I witnessed a 53 yr old200 lb+ run 20:30

Fat guys like King should be a lot better at shorter distances. Probably worse on hilly courses too.

I went to college with King.

Believe it was the spring of 1979, we put on a small 5K race on campus at Ohio University for a local charity trying to raise a few bucks and had at most probably about 60-70 runners. A friend was manning the finish chute handing out popsicle sticks for places. After the first several runners came through, Peter King came barrelling around the last corner sprinting like a bat out of hell. Back then he was a chubby guy (hey he still is kind of a chubby guy, although I guess he has lost some weight from his running, good for him). Looking at him come in, my friend's assumption was that he probably jumped in the final 200 yards since you couldn’t see the last stretch of the course and he obviously couldn’t run that fast. At the time he was an editor for the school paper and known around campus by many students, also had the reputation as being arrogant and somewhat of a blowhard. My friend knew people who knew him and recognized him. King then asked what he got for finishing? My friend told him water/orange slices just like everyone else, but thought to himself what a dick! Bandit in little race thinking he might get something.

rojo wrote:

I have no idea why this thread was taken down.

You know exactly why it was taken down. It was taken down because you and your brother do not have consistent moderation standards and do not require your moderators to apply any consistent logic for their decisions.

Improving the moderation on this board should be your #1 priority. #2 should be running spell-check on all your articles and posts.

His name answers any questions you may have about his motives in that race.