llort_vbo wrote:
Well, they want to distract from Radcliffe being accused of doping.....
LRC is the biggest website out there that covers pro running, but you give us too much credit. A post we put on the message boards and don't even highlight on the homepage is not going to be able to distract from a Paula Radcliffe story.
thr brojo outrage machine wrote:
Most of us are coming to this thread to laugh at you, not because this "breaking news" is substantive. Once again letsrun shows itself to be a joke.
Actually a tiny small minority of people are coming to laugh at us. Most people don't waist their precious time and come here repeatedly because they like what they get.
Conte reiterates one key point and that is how serious Alberteo microdosing his sons is and he could be banned for it. Alberto claims it was for innocent reasons. I think a reading of anti-doping rules is Alberto could even be banned if you accepted his reasoning. Support staff are not supposed to be giving prohibited substances to others and he definitely did that.
Regardless there still are a lot of unanswered questions like whose prescription was used for the experiment. If it is Alberto's it pokes holes in the claim that his androgel was only used for his own personal use. Alberto made a point of getting letters from his doctors showing his androgel prescription amount was consistent with only his only personal use. I think it would be very easy to give some of the prescription to others and the experiment Alberto sets up shows that if his prescription was used.