Any track athletes?
Tennis?
Golf?
Fighting?
I say none. Do you think there are a hundred 135-140 lb. men on this entire earth who could beat Rousey? Easily.
Any track athletes?
Tennis?
Golf?
Fighting?
I say none. Do you think there are a hundred 135-140 lb. men on this entire earth who could beat Rousey? Easily.
Gaberdine Suit wrote:
Any track athletes?
Tennis?
Golf?
Fighting?
I say none. Do you think there are a hundred 135-140 lb. men on this entire earth who could beat Rousey? Easily.
I remember when, I believe, the 200th ranked tennis male played Serena in a match. He defeated her 6-1 and 6-2 but he was barely even trying.
Gaberdine Suit wrote:
Any track athletes?
Tennis?
Golf?
Fighting?
I say none. Do you think there are a hundred 135-140 lb. men on this entire earth who could beat Rousey? Easily.
I would say there are millions, heck even billions, 140-pound males who are athletic and with some muscles who could beat Rhonda back to the stone ages.
There aren't even a billion 140-lb males on Earth right now...
I mean Genzebe could destroy German Fernandez, but I doubt he's in the top 200 right now
The only event where females can beat the top 100 males is in giving child birth.
according to this first link that popped up when I googled it, women learn better, have a higher IQ, do better at interviews, are cleaner, are more recession proof in their jobs, are more likely to graduate high school and college, far less likely to die in car crashes, and are better at remembering the remainder of this list.
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/advice/g1711/women-better-than-men-things/
Their longevity is much higher as well.
Boys and men need to buckle down, obey the law more, do fewer dangerous and stupid things, and work harder.
The libtard jjjj comes with his twisted world view again.
Men are statistically much more diverse than women. This means that the best 100 males will be much better than the 100 best females even if the male mean values are worse than the female mean values.
Now, go take a statistics course.
That's a long winded way of saying, "No" We're talking athletics.
It depends on what you mean. If you mean only those currently competing and not those men who could if they wanted to, and you include less physical sports, then yes. Billiards, I'd think.
If you meant only more physical sports, in particular, ours, then at her peak, Ann Trason was certainly better than the 100th best ultra trail runner. Even on the roads, she was probably better than the 100th best 100k runnerr in the world. Also, I think Abe's 100k record (6:33) would have beaten the 100th best male 100k runner at the time.
But in any sport that is fairly physical and widely contested, the answer is 'no'. Even golf or bowling.
Women beat men in open water long distance swimming. Their fat protects them better from the cold.
Polly P wrote:
Gaberdine Suit wrote:Any track athletes?
Tennis?
Golf?
Fighting?
I say none. Do you think there are a hundred 135-140 lb. men on this entire earth who could beat Rousey? Easily.
I remember when, I believe, the 200th ranked tennis male played Serena in a match. He defeated her 6-1 and 6-2 but he was barely even trying.
Here's the Serena story
http://observer.theguardian.com/osm/story/0,,543962,00.htmlIt's pretty funny.
Oh, I see, you are a bright one with the ad hominem attacks and the nonsense "stats" claim.
Rhythmic gymnastics and sychnonized swimming seem to favor women's abilities more.
Yes the #1 MT female fighter in thailand can beat the #100 MT fighter in USA in the same weight cat.yep.
How many female Republicans agree with you that women are worse at everything except childbirth?
jjjjjj wrote:
How many female Republicans agree with you that women are worse at everything except childbirth?
jjjjj you seem to think women are superior to men in about everything. Please name all the notable inventions made by women. Also, name all the notable Nobel prize winners by women in the sciences besides Madame Curie. They haven't done squat!
Women hear us roar! wrote:
jjjjjj wrote:How many female Republicans agree with you that women are worse at everything except childbirth?
jjjjj you seem to think women are superior to men in about everything. Please name all the notable inventions made by women. Also, name all the notable Nobel prize winners by women in the sciences besides Madame Curie. They haven't done squat!
Maryam Mirzakhani.
jjjjjjjj wrote:
according to this first link that popped up when I googled it, women learn better, have a higher IQ, do better at interviews, are cleaner, are more recession proof in their jobs, are more likely to graduate high school and college, far less likely to die in car crashes, and are better at remembering the remainder of this list.
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/advice/g1711/women-better-than-men-things/Their longevity is much higher as well.
Boys and men need to buckle down, obey the law more, do fewer dangerous and stupid things, and work harder.
Thanks to the wussification of American males like you, it is true.
geodesics wrote:
Women hear us roar! wrote:jjjjj you seem to think women are superior to men in about everything. Please name all the notable inventions made by women. Also, name all the notable Nobel prize winners by women in the sciences besides Madame Curie. They haven't done squat!
Maryam Mirzakhani.
LOL. She never won the Nobel Prize. She won a Fields Medal. So funny!