No. That is not my claim.
I was arguing that there is reason to believe Mo is doping, and that it is not "clear that he is very unlikely to be doping." I am not adamant that he is. There is a difference.
Insulting me as a person does not make my arguments any less sound, nor does it makes yours any more so.
Again, no, it is not "clear that he is very unlikely to be doping."
You said it is clear that he is very unlikely to be doping.
In other words, your claim was not only is he almost certainly not doping, but further, we can know that this is the case.
It does not follow that he is very unlikely to be doping based on the report, nor does it follow that we can know that he is very unlikely to be doping.
Again, this is not a reason to believe he hasn't doped. The BBC reporter took EPO, put his blood through the system, and it wasn't flagged as being suspicious.
Not once again. Nothing changed. The values they reviewed in 2015 were the same values collected when the samples were taken.
By not having doped.
Whether he has doped, and whether we can know that he has doped, are two different propositions.
I don't know, nor is it my job to know.
- He has been the best distance runner in the world for the past 4 years.
- If you are beating the best dopers, you are either supremely talented, or are doping yourself.
- He made an unprecedented late career improvement after going to the NOP.
- The NOP is currently under investigation by USADA.
- Mo's coach works to get every possible advantage, supposedly including but not limited to, getting inhalers for athletes that don't need them, knowing how much testosterone cream one can rub into an athlete without triggering a positive test, coaching an athlete on how to get an IV drip, encouraging his athlete to take prescription drugs for which they don't have a prescription, sending prescription drugs through the mail, sending many of his athletes to doctor Jefferey Brown to be diagnosed with hypothyroidism, etc, etc, etc
- He routinely goes to Kenya, which we know now is a haven for easy access to drugs, as well as a place where out of competition blood tests are not taken, or rarely taken (i.e., not since 2006 with Rita Jeptoo).
- Recently trained with a drug cheat in Kenya.
- He was grilled for several hours last week in a hotel by the same lawyer who helped take down Lance Armstrong.
It doesn't follow that because never failing a test doesn't tell you if someone has cheated, that therefore, tests should be done away with altogether.
I didn't claim tests mean nothing, I claimed that they mean next to nothing insofar as they allow one to know if someone has doped.
No, it was picked up before. However, nothing was done about it.
No, it does not mean that those medals were won cleanly, it means that his values did not hit the threshold of what has been deemed abnormal.
You characterize people on this forum who express a view you do not share as living in their mother's basement in an attempt to dismiss what they've said without actually having to address it, or in an attempt to discredit it before you do, similarly to the way you described me as not being a sensible person.
Such characterizations do not further your argument.
The bar for libel in the UK is lower than it is in the US, so it isn't surprising that no one spoke on the record against Mo. There have however been many people who have come forward since that documentary aired.
Kara left the NOP in 2011 which is the same year that Mo joined.
See above.
He has a house in Portland and his family lives there. He is around Salazar plenty enough to get the good stuff.
Correct.
I never claimed it was a conspiracy. I merely pointed out the reason as to why he doesn't have faster 5k & 10k PRs, which you cited as a reason as to why one should believe he is clean.
He has the word record for 2 miles indoors.
Not surprising considering, again, that he doesn't time trial 5ks.
Your claim, not mine.
I never claimed that if he runs fast, then he must be on drugs.
With people who rationally and dispassionately assess the facts as they are?
No, it does not follow that because his championships wins have come in races slower than the Olympic or world championship records, that therefore, his wins are probably clean.
Further, Mo broke the world record of a person who holds those Olympic and world championship records.
The irony.
If you want an example of something taken out of context, refer to your sentence that preceded the one I was replying to:
That is giving something zero context. Stating a fact such as his 1500 in 2013 put him at #6 all time, is not taking something out of context.
Nick is not a 10k runner.
I'd expect 800m specialists to run a fast 800m.
Mo is not a 1500m specialist.
Running really fast multiple times doesn't many one less suspicious.
I do.
No one has run sub 3:29 without pacemakers.