Justin Gatlin tested 59 times by USADA since 2010.

ggilder wrote:

The likelihood of any of them still doping is close to zero. Get a life.

UMMMHMMM wrote:

gatlin and elfie rupp need to be tested thousands of times a year

The likelihood of any of them not taking PEDs every day is zero.

The US cheats, that's what level this is at. What are the first two letter in USADA. Same as in USPS. The fricken US postal service team had the best doping scheme ever. When Gatlin and the rest go to international meets they are wearing A US uniform. If they are cheating, the US is cheating! China cheats we cheat. It's the same. Quit wondering when there are going to be more positives. Nobody who matters wants them….just a token bust here and there. That'll do .

janitor wrote:

I've got to disagree with this type of conspiracy thinking.

Going for the personal attack early?? I guess the facts are just too overwhelming.

quote]janitor wrote: We're not dealing with the NFL/MLB in the 1990s, multi-billion dollar corporations who were making tons of money off steroid-pumped superathletes.

[/quote]

Good stuff here. Usatf is so clean because it's a small time sport. Uh huh. Marion Jones agrees with you. That IAAF is a small time org. Diack bribes? Doping bribes?

janitor wrote: I doubt your average USATF official is eager to celebrate Gatlin--not when there are plenty of other ostensibly clean athletes to focus on.

Where? Diamond league? Big marathons? Where exactly?

janitor wrote:Remember the glee with which they announced they'd finally nabbed Armstrong.

No. Who is "they?". Usada only did what they are empowered to do, recommend a sanction to the cycling federation who reluctantly approved the recommendation.

The facts are working against you. Keep that head in the sand!

a certain tennis player was introduced to

igf-1 lr3 by her then new french coach and

before that career was on slide.

if they never meet very different story.

Amazing peptide ,ask gatlin .

reason wont beat bolt is this peptide

takeaway very possible.

ability to get those long legs going beyond

normal cadence and just physically cant match that stride length with relative cadence .even wit gatlins own large stride

just physical differences that cant outdope

and fact bolt is willing to match him in the doping stakes helps too.

bolt taking you for mugs ,done same past champianships never going to peak peak cycle on this stuff till time is right.

gatlin also easily add 2-3 meters in 200

with speed endurance from high hct .

nike very good at that ......

so sub 19.40 very possible if turns up.

that is another big difference from other seasons and got that extra meter in 100.

tests are worthless and misdirection...

Bro? I'm not your Bro or a scrub. Did I run? I guarantee you that you couldn't get into the parking lot of the track meets I competed in. Name the meet and I've competed in it, and yes that includes the big ones. As far as "Speculation" you mention, yeah I have the right to speculate as an athlete who performed at the highest level clean and never had taken a PED to express my opinion on Mr. Gatlin. I competed against many suspect athletes and never had an issue due to them never testing positive. The ones that did test dirty I did have a problem because they directly impacted appearance fees and prize money that I could have earned. Usain, Mo, Galen, Kiprop and Rudisha have not tested positive and I love watching them compete. Could they be cheating? Maybe. But there's no smoke which means there's no fire. There's a little puff of smoke with Mo, Galen and Alberto but nothing conclusive. On the other hand Gatlin is a proven convicted cheater who will be labeled as such forever. I don't care if he runs 8.0 for the 100m, myself and many world class athletes past and present will never respect him or any thing he accomplishes or any other convicted cheater for that matter.

So be careful who you call a "Scrub" and "Bro" and you're absolutely correct in the final three words of your post...."Not My Place" because it's not. Nor have you earned the right for it to be.